Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/841,655

FLUID PRESSURE CIRCUIT

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 26, 2024
Priority
Feb 28, 2022 — JP 2022-029996 +1 more
Examiner
NGUYEN, DUSTIN T
Art Unit
3745
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Eagle Industry Co. Ltd.
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
340 granted / 469 resolved
+2.5% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
506
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
66.0%
+26.0% vs TC avg
§102
10.2%
-29.8% vs TC avg
§112
22.4%
-17.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 469 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 03/19/2026 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 03/19/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant's remarks state that: Turning to the art rejections and considering first the rejection of claims 1-4 and 6-9 as anticipated by Kang, Kang discloses a fluid pressure circuit including a fluid supply source (310), a cylinder device (200) provided with a first chamber (2019 and a second chamber (202), a tank (tank symbol), a flow diverter valve 400, and a controller (700). On page 3 of the Action, the Examiner suggests that in Col. 5 lines 54-67 and Col. 6 lines 1-5 of Kang that the flow diverter valve 400 might be a valve configured to receive an electrical control signal from the controller, to divert some of the return fluid from the cylinder device and to discharge the some of the return fluid to the tank via a throttle. This means Kang teaches that the return fluid to be returned the cylinder device and the return fluid to be diverted and discharged to the tank pass through the same throttle. Therefore, Kang fails to teach or suggest the aforementioned important features of the present invention recited in amended independent claim 1, especially that "the flow diverter valve is a valve which is configured to receive an electrical control signal from the controller, to divert some of the return fluid from the cylinder device and to discharge the some of the return fluid to the tank via a throttle, and in which the return fluid to be returned to the second chamber does not pass through the throttle". Thus, claim 1 and claims 2-4 and 6-9 which depend directly or indirectly thereon cannot be said to be anticipated by or obvious from Kang. However, Kang does not appear to support applicant’s assertion of "this means Kang teaches that the return fluid to be returned the cylinder device and the return fluid to be diverted and discharged to the tank pass through the same throttle." Kang’s drawings appear to show two distinct throttles formed by 410 and 420. The fluid returning from the hydraulic cylinder 200 is split between the two distinct throttles 410 and 420. Kang Col. 6 lines 20-67 discloses controlling both the openings of spools 410 and 420 to adjust the throttle sizes to adjust flow rates through each of them respectively. The return fluid from the hydraulic cylinder is split such that some fluid returns to the tank via throttle formed by 410 and some fluid flows through a throttle formed by 420 which is distinct from throttle 410, and therefore meets the limitation "an in which the return fluid to be returned to the second chamber does not pass through the throttle", wherein in "the throttle" refers to the throttle established in this limitation "that diverts some of the return fluid from the cylinder device and to discharge the some of the return fluid to the tank via a throttle". Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4, 6-9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kang (US 10988915). Kang discloses: 1. (currently amended) A fluid pressure circuit, comprising: a fluid supply source (310); a cylinder device (200) including a first chamber (201) and a second chamber (202) which are partitioned from each other; a tank (tank symbol seen in Fig. 1, downstream 370); a flow diverter valve (400); and a controller (700), wherein the flow diverter valve is disposed on a flow passage disposed between the fluid supply source and the cylinder device (flow passage that includes 770 is between the fluid supply source 310 and the cylinder device 200), the flow passage is configured to communicate with a recovery passage (675) through which a return fluid flows from the first chamber to the second chamber (Col. 5 lines 61-67, Col. 6 lines 1-5), and the flow diverter valve is valve configured to receive an electrical control signal from the controller (Col. 6 lines 32-67, electric signal lines between controller 700 and valve 400 to spools 410 and 420 that form throttles), to divert some of the return fluid from the cylinder device and to discharge the some of the return fluid to the tank via a throttle (Col. 5 lines 54-67, Col. 6 lines 1-5, lines 32-67); and in which the return fluid to be returned to the second chamber does not pass through the throttle (Kang’s drawings appear to show two distinct throttles formed by 410 and 420. The fluid returning from the hydraulic cylinder 200 is split between the two distinct throttles 410 and 420. Kang Col. 6 lines 20-67 discloses controlling both the openings of spools 410 and 420 to adjust the throttle sizes to adjust flow rates through each of them respectively. The return fluid from the hydraulic cylinder is split such that some fluid returns to the tank via throttle formed by 410 and some fluid flows through a throttle formed by 420 which is distinct from throttle 410, and therefore meets the limitation "an in which the return fluid to be returned to the second chamber does not pass through the throttle", wherein in "the throttle" refers to the throttle established in this limitation "that diverts some of the return fluid from the cylinder device and to discharge the some of the return fluid to the tank via a throttle"). 2. (previously presented) The fluid pressure circuit according to claim 1, wherein the fluid pressure circuit further includes a throttle passage provided separately from the throttle of the flow diverter valve (throttle passage is formed within 410), and a low-fluid-resistance passage with a lower fluid resistance than the throttle passage, wherein the low-fluid-resistance passage is configured for communicating with the recovery passage (throttle within recovery passage is adjustable to be relatively lower fluid resistance, Col. 6 lines 20-26, lines 38-53, therefore at least when the opening area of the spool 420 is increased is interpreted to be a low-fluid-resistance passage). 3. (previously presented) The fluid pressure circuit according to claim 2, wherein the low-fluid-resistance passage is provided in the flow diverter valve (low-fluid resistance passage through 420 is within the flow diverter valve 400). 4. (previously presented) The fluid pressure circuit according to claim 2, wherein the throttle passage includes two passage parts, wherein one of the two passage parts is configured for communicating with the recovery passage (passage path 420 communicates with the recovery passage 675). 6. (previously presented) The fluid pressure circuit according claim 1, wherein the recovery passage is configured to allow for a flow therein only when the cylinder device is retracted (Col. 8 lines 22-26 discloses that controller controls the flow diverter valve spool 420, which controls the opening amount of the recovery passage 675, is closed when the cylinder device is ascending/extending and Col. 5 lines 61-67, Col. 6 lines 1-5, Col. 7 lines 1-9 discloses the controller controls the flow diverter valve spool 420 to be open, which opens the recovery passage 675, when the cylinder device is retracting/descending). 7. (previously presented) The fluid pressure circuit according to claim 2, wherein the recovery passage is configured to allow for a flow therein only when the cylinder device is retracted (Col. 8 lines 22-26 discloses that controller controls the flow diverter valve spool 420, which controls the opening of the recovery passage, is closed when the cylinder device is ascending/extending and Col. 5 lines 61-67, Col. 6 lines 1-5, Col. 7 lines 1-9 discloses the controller controls the flow diverter valve spool 420 to be open, which opens the recovery passage 675, when the cylinder device is retracting/descending). 8. (previously presented) The fluid pressure circuit according to claim 3, wherein the recovery passage is configured to allow for a flow therein only when the cylinder device is retracted (Col. 8 lines 22-26 discloses that controller controls the flow diverter valve spool 420, which controls the opening of the recovery passage, is closed when the cylinder device is ascending/extending and Col. 5 lines 61-67, Col. 6 lines 1-5, Col. 7 lines 1-9 discloses the controller controls the flow diverter valve spool 420 to be open, which opens the recovery passage 675, when the cylinder device is retracting/descending). 9. (previously presented) The fluid pressure circuit according to claim 4, wherein the recovery passage is configured to allow for a flow therein only when the cylinder device is retracted (Col. 8 lines 22-26 discloses that controller controls the flow diverter valve spool 420, which controls the opening of the recovery passage, is closed when the cylinder device is ascending/extending and Col. 5 lines 61-67, Col. 6 lines 1-5, Col. 7 lines 1-9 discloses the controller controls the flow diverter valve spool 420 to be open, which opens the recovery passage 675, when the cylinder device is retracting/descending). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 5 and 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kang in view of Shirai et al. (US 5218897), hereinafter ‘Shirai’. Regarding claim 5, Kang discloses the fluid pressure circuit according to claim 1, further comprising a switching valve (500) provided in a flow passage between the fluid supply source (310) and the flow diverter valve (400) to control an inflow and outflow of a fluid between the fluid supply source and the cylinder device (Col. 5 lines 18-22), Kang does not disclose wherein the recovery passage is provided inside the switching valve. However, Shirai discloses a fluid pressure circuit similar to Kawasaki and the present application and therefore constitutes analogous art. Shirai teaches a switching valve 10 provided in between the pressure source 23 and the boom cylinder 32 to control an inflow and outflow of a fluid between the fluid supply source and the cylinder device, and the recovery passage 26 is provided inside the switching valve, wherein the recovery passage 26 allows fluid from the piston side chamber 3a to flow to the rod side chamber 3b similar to the recovery passage of the present application and Kang’s recovery passage (Kang, recovery passage 675 corresponds to Shirai’s recovery passage 26). Since combining prior at elements according to known methods to yield predictable results is an exemplary rationale the supports a conclusion of obviousness, and since rearrangement of parts provides supporting rationale, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed to have modified the system of Kang to have provided the recovery passage within the switching valve as taught by Shirai. The proposed modification would not yield any unexpected results and would not change the primary operation of the system of Kang. Repositioning the recovery passage to within another valve appears to be a matter of design choice because relocating the conduit to extend through the valve would not change the function of the recovery passage and would not change the function of the system. The combination of Kang and Shirai further renders obvious: 10. (previously presented) The fluid pressure circuit according to claim 5, wherein the recovery passage is configured to allow for a flow therein only when the cylinder device is retracted (Kang, Col. 8 lines 22-26 discloses that controller controls the flow diverter valve spool 420, which controls the opening of the recovery passage, is closed when the cylinder device is ascending/extending and Col. 5 lines 61-67, Col. 6 lines 1-5, Col. 7 lines 1-9 discloses the controller controls the flow diverter valve spool 420 to be open, which opens the recovery passage 675, when the cylinder device is retracting/descending). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Dustin T Nguyen whose telephone number is (571)270-0163. The examiner can normally be reached M - F: 8:00am - 4:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nathaniel E. Wiehe can be reached at (571) 272-8648. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DUSTIN T NGUYEN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3745 April 24, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 5 earlier events
Sep 30, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 02, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 07, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Dec 22, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 15, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Mar 19, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 07, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12617524
Uplock Unlock Electro-Hydrostatic Actuator
2y 1m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12618420
HYDRAULIC ACTUATOR AND METHOD FOR OPERATING
1y 10m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12618421
HYDRAULIC DRIVE SYSTEM
1y 4m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12600482
ACTUATOR, SAFETY DEVICE, AND FLYING BODY
2y 4m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601152
A MACHINE COMPRISING A SWING-TRAVEL HYDRAULIC SYSTEM
2y 4m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+17.3%)
2y 6m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 469 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month