Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/841,691

DISPLAY METHOD FOR SKILL INDICATOR, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102§112§Other
Filed
Aug 27, 2024
Priority
Mar 02, 2022 — CN 202210197638.3 +1 more
Examiner
YOO, JASSON H
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Netease (hangzhou) Network Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allowance Rate
458 granted / 737 resolved
+2.1% vs TC avg
Strong +33% interview lift
Without
With
+33.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
772
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
19.9%
-20.1% vs TC avg
§103
31.0%
-9.0% vs TC avg
§102
13.5%
-26.5% vs TC avg
§112
24.6%
-15.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 737 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112 §Other
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 10-11, 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 10 recites a non-transitory computer-executable storage medium having computer-executable instructions stored thereon, which when called and executed by a processor, cause the processor to implement the display method for the skill indicator according to claim 1. The claim 10 is indefinite because the claim claims both a product (a non-transitory computer-executable storage) and a method of using the product (by dependency of claim 1). A single claim which claims both an apparatus and the method steps of using the apparatus is indefinite under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph. See In re Katz Interactive Call Processing Patent Litigation. The claim is indefinite because it is unclear whether infringement occurs when on creates the non-transitory computer-executable storage medium or whether infringement occurs when a user operates a terminal device with the non-transitory computer-executable storage medium to display the skill indicator. Claim 11 recites the limitation "the differences" in line 3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. In addition, claim 11 recites, “each direction” in line 4. The claim is indefinite because it is not clear what the plurality of differences and directions are. Claim 19 include similar limitations and is rejected for the same reason as discussed above. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(d): (d) REFERENCE IN DEPENDENT FORMS.—Subject to subsection (e), a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, fourth paragraph: Subject to the following paragraph [i.e., the fifth paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112], a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. Claim 10 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, 4th paragraph, as being of improper dependent form for failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends, or for failing to include all the limitations of the claim upon which it depends. Claim 10 recites a non-transitory computer-executable storage medium having computer-executable instructions stored thereon, which when called and executed by a processor, cause the processor to implement the display method for the skill indicator according to claim 1. Claim 10 is rejected under 112d because a non-transitory computer-executable storage medium have computer-executable instructions to perform the computer implemented step but does not perform the method claim. Applicant may cancel the claim(s), amend the claim(s) to place the claim(s) in proper dependent form, rewrite the claim(s) in independent form, or present a sufficient showing that the dependent claim(s) complies with the statutory requirements. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 7, 9-10, 13-14, 18, 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Liu (CN 114082173A) (based on provided machine translation). Claim 1. Liu discloses a display method for a skill indicator, performed by a terminal device (102 in Fig. 1, paragraph 18), comprising: determining, in response to a triggering operation on a target skill , a release position and an effect range of the target skill (pages 5-11), wherein the release position is a scene unit in a virtual scene displayed in a graphical user interface (Figs. 2a-2c, 4a-11), the virtual scene comprises a plurality of scene units (page 6, .e. at least two virtual objects, two hostile camp of virtual object; page 6, paragraph 6), the plurality of scene units are arranged continuously (Figs. 2a-2c, 4a-11), and the scene unit is in a shape of a hexagon, and wherein the release position is located in the effect range (pages 2-3; page 8, paragraph 8 – page 9, paragraph 7; page 12-13; i.e. Figs. 8-11), and the effect range comprises some of the plurality of scene units (page 7, paragraphs 2-4); determining direction information of the skill indicator of the target skill based on relative positions of multiple specified scene units in the effect range (pages 2-3; page 8, paragraph 8 – page 9, paragraph 7; page 12-13; i.e. Figs. 8-11); and generating and displaying the skill indicator along a direction indicated by the direction information, based on an indicator parameter preset for the target skill, by taking the release position as a reference (pages 2-3; page 8, paragraph 8 – page 9, paragraph 7; page 12-13; i.e. Figs. 8-11). Claim 2. Liu discloses the method according to claim 1, wherein determining, in response to the triggering operation on the target skill, the release position and the effect range of the target skill, comprises: determining, in response to a drag operation exerted on a skill control for the target skill, the release position of the target skill based on a drag position of the skill control; determining, in a hexagonal coordinate system of the virtual scene, coordinate information of each scene unit in the effect range of the target skill, based on an effect range parameter preset for the target skill and the release position; and determining the coordinate information of each scene unit in the effect range of the target skill as the effect range of the target skill (pages 2-3; page 8, paragraph 8 – page 9, paragraph 7; page 12-13; i.e. Figs. 8-11; i.e. Figs. 2a-2c, 7-11) Claim 3. Liu discloses the method according to claim 1, wherein determining the direction information of the skill indicator of the target skill based on the relative positions of the multiple specified scene units in the effect range, comprises: obtaining a target scene unit that is farthest from the release position in the effect range; and determining the direction information of the skill indicator of the target skill based on relationships between a line connecting the target scene unit and the release position (pages 2-3; page 8, paragraph 8 – page 9, paragraph 7; page 12-13; i.e. Figs. 8-11; i.e. Figs. 2a-2c, 7-11) and edges as well as corners of the hexagon (Hexagon form grid without gap and does not overlap and therefore incorporate edges and corners; page 2, paragraph 10 – page 3, paragraph 1) Claim 7. Liu discloses the method according to claim 1, wherein generating and displaying the skill indicator along the direction indicated by the direction information, based on the indicator parameter preset for the target skill, by taking the release position as the reference, comprises: determining a size parameter of the skill indicator based on a shape and an effect distance of the effect range of the target skill; and generating and displaying the skill indicator along the direction indicated by the direction information, by taking the release position as the reference, wherein a display size of the skill indicator matches with the size parameter (page 7, paragraph 3; pages 12-13; Figs. 8-11) Claim 12. Liu discloses the method according to claim 7, wherein the effect distance comprises one scene unit, two scene units, three scene units or four scene units (scene unit may comprise one or multiple units within the multiple hexagons; page 6, paragraph 6 – page 7, paragraph 1 and as illustrated in Figs. 2b-2c, 7-11). Claims 9-10, 13-14, 18, 20. See rejections above. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-6, 15-17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Jasson H Yoo whose telephone number is (571)272-5563. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Peter Vasat can be reached at 571 270-7625. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JASSON H YOO/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 27, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112, §Other (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12705952
UNIFIED JACKPOT SYSTEM FOR PERSONALIZED JACKPOTS
2y 12m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12676050
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VOLUNTARILY PROVIDING BIOMETRIC DATA FOR ANONYMOUS PLAYER TRACKING
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12657990
METHOD FOR REVEALING DICE RESULTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12626563
CENTRAL DETERMINATION GAMING SYSTEM WITH LIMITED TERM PERSISTENT ELEMENTS
3y 9m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12608997
CASINO SECURITY SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MONITORING WAGERING GAMES
4y 0m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+33.3%)
3y 3m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 737 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month