Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/841,812

PRECODING MATRIX DETERMINATION METHOD, DEVICE, STORAGE MEDIUM, AND APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 27, 2024
Priority
Feb 28, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTCN2022078445
Examiner
COBY, FRANTZ
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Beijing Xiaomi Mobile Software Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allowance Rate
681 granted / 752 resolved
+30.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +5% lift
Without
With
+5.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
759
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.9%
-31.1% vs TC avg
§103
40.7%
+0.7% vs TC avg
§102
24.3%
-15.7% vs TC avg
§112
11.8%
-28.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 752 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This Office Action is in response to Application filed on August 27, 2024 in which claims 1-9, 12-13, 16-22 are presented for examination; of which, claims 1, 5-7, 12-13, 16-17 were amended; claims 10-11 and 14-15 were canceled; claims 18-22 were newly added. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on August 27, 2026; May 23, 2025 and August 27, 2024 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-9, 12-13, 16-22 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Manolakos et al. WO2022040046A1. Regarding claims 1 and 16, Manolakos et al. WO2022040046A1 disclose “a precoding matrix determination method” ((Ref. paras [0032-0033]) D1 discloses a method for channel state information (CSI) feedback from a user equipment to a base station. The channel state information includes precoding matrix indication), comprising: “obtaining, by a base station, channel characteristic information qk,t” (Ref. para[0077] and Fig. 4A, "payload n(t)") Manolakos et al. WO2022040046A1 discloses that a payload n(t) is received at the decoder of the network device, i.e. the base station) and “a compression rate parameter γ from a user equipment (UE)” ((Ref. para[0081] and Fig. 4A, elements 422, 424), Manolakos et al. WO2022040046A1 discloses encoders and decoders having aligned parameters. Manolakos et al. WO2022040046A1 further disclose that an uplink payload size is determined based on uplink budget and reconstruction quality. This determination is identical to the determination of a "compression rate". Manolakos et al. WO2022040046A1 further discloses that the user equipment (encoding device) sends an index of a selected encoder to the network device based on the determination. This index is an implicit indication of the compression rate employed by the encoding device) “wherein k is used to indicate a kth UE and t is used to indicate a timestamp” (Ref. para [0077] and Fig. 4A, "payload n(t)") The time is explicitly indicated in Manolakos et al. WO2022040046A1. The fact that each signal is associated with a given user is implicit in Manolakos et al. WO2022040046A1); and “determining, by the base station, precoding matrices Ft and Wt based on the compression rate parameter γ and the channel characteristic information qk, t” (Ref. paras[0032-0033] Manolakos et al. WO2022040046A1 discloses that CSI, including several precoding matrices, can be determined from the decoded channel information). Claims 2 and 8: Known from Manolakos et al. WO2022040046A1 (Ref. paras [0076-0077], [0087] and Fig. 4A). Claim 3: Manolakos et al. WO2022040046A1 discloses that the decoder comprises multiple sub-networks (Ref. Fig. 4A). Claim 4 (detailed parallel LSTM + residual modules, phase shifter Ot, different matrix sizes): These are predictable design choices. Claims 5, 6, 9 (training at BS, analog sub-networks, parameter distribution): Standard end-to-end training and parameter sharing in Manolakos et al. WO2022040046A1. Distributing trained parameters to UEs is obvious. Receiving parameters from the network side is known from Manolakos et al. WO2022040046A1 (Ref. para [0175] and Fig. 11, step 1106a). Regarding claims 7, 13 and 17, Manolakos et al. WO2022040046A1 disclose “a precoding matrix determination method” ((Ref. paras [0032-0033]) D1 discloses a method for channel state information (CSI) feedback from a user equipment to a base station. The channel state information includes precoding matrix indication), comprising: “determining, by a user equipment (UE), channel characteristic information hk,t” (Ref. para[0077] and Fig. 4A, "payload n(t)") Manolakos et al. WO2022040046A1 discloses that a payload n(t) is received at the decoder of the network device, i.e. the base station) and “a compression rate parameter γ from a user equipment (UE)” ((Ref. para[0081] and Fig. 4A, elements 422, 424), “wherein k is used to indicate a kth UE and t is used to indicate a timestamp corresponding to the channel information hk,t” (Ref. para [0077] and Fig. 4A, "payload n(t)") The time is explicitly indicated in Manolakos et al. WO2022040046A1. The fact that each signal is associated with a given user is implicit in Manolakos et al. WO2022040046A1); and “determining, by the UE, channel characteristic information qₖ,t based on the channel estimation information hₖ,t, wherein a dimension of the channel characteristic information qₖ,t is lower than a dimension of the channel estimation information hₖ,t” (Ref. paras[0032-0033] Manolakos et al. WO2022040046A1 discloses that CSI, including several precoding matrices, can be determined from the decoded channel information); and “sending, by the UE, the channel characteristic information qₖ,t and a compression rate parameter γ to a base station” Manolakos et al. WO2022040046A1 discloses encoders and decoders having aligned parameters. Manolakos et al. WO2022040046A1 further disclose that an uplink payload size is determined based on uplink budget and reconstruction quality. This determination is identical to the determination of a "compression rate". Manolakos et al. WO2022040046A1 further discloses that the user equipment (encoding device) sends an index of a selected encoder to the network device based on the determination. This index is an implicit indication of the compression rate employed by the encoding device) Regarding claims 12 and 18 Manolakos et al. WO2022040046A1 disclose “a communication device, comprising a processor and a memory having a computer program stored thereon, wherein when the computer program is executed by the processor” ((Ref. paras [0032-0033]) D1 discloses a method for channel state information (CSI) feedback from a user equipment to a base station. The channel state information includes precoding matrix indication), the device configured to: “obtain channel characteristic information qk,t” (Ref. para[0077] and Fig. 4A, "payload n(t)") Manolakos et al. WO2022040046A1 discloses that a payload n(t) is received at the decoder of the network device, i.e. the base station) and “and a compression rate parameter Y from a user equipment (UE),” ((Ref. para[0081] and Fig. 4A, elements 422, 424), Manolakos et al. WO2022040046A1 discloses encoders and decoders having aligned parameters. Manolakos et al. WO2022040046A1 further disclose that an uplink payload size is determined based on uplink budget and reconstruction quality. This determination is identical to the determination of a "compression rate". Manolakos et al. WO2022040046A1 further discloses that the user equipment (encoding device) sends an index of a selected encoder to the network device based on the determination. This index is an implicit indication of the compression rate employed by the encoding device) “wherein k is used to indicate a kth UE and t is used to indicate a timestamp” (Ref. para [0077] and Fig. 4A, "payload n(t)") The time is explicitly indicated in Manolakos et al. WO2022040046 A1. The fact that each signal is associated with a given user is implicit in Manolakos et al. WO2022040046A1); and “determine precoding matrices Ft and Wt based on the compression rate parameter Y and the channel characteristic information qk,t₂” (Ref. paras[0032-0033] Manolakos et al. WO2022040046A1 discloses that CSI, including several precoding matrices, can be determined from the decoded channel information). Claim 18 Known from Manolakos et al. WO2022040046A1 (Ref. paras [0076-0077], [0087] and Fig. 4A). Claim 19: Manolakos et al. WO2022040046A1 discloses that the decoder comprises multiple sub-networks (Ref. Fig. 4A). Claim 20 (detailed parallel LSTM+ residual modules, phase shifter Ot, different matrix sizes): These are predictable design choices. Claims 21-22 (training at BS, analog sub-networks, parameter distribution): Standard end-to-end training and parameter sharing in Manolakos et al. WO2022040046A1. Distributing trained parameters to UEs is obvious. Receiving parameters from the network side is known from Manolakos et al. WO2022040046A1 (Ref. para [0175] and Fig. 11, step 1106a). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FRANTZ COBY whose telephone number is (571)272-4017. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 7AM-5:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Tonia Dollinger can be reached at (571) 272-4170. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FRANTZ COBY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2459 September 14, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 27, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12745242
INDICATION/REPORT REPETITION INFORMATION'S PROCEDURE FOR PUCCH HARQ FEEDBACK FOR MSG4
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12745274
METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR USER EQUIPMENT SELECTING AND SCHEDULING IN INTELLIGENT WIRELESS SYSTEM
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12739749
METHODS FOR CONTROLLING TERMINAL DEVICE AND TERMINAL DEVICE
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12739142
AUDIO TRANSCRIPTION FOR ELECTRONIC CONFERENCING
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12739179
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR APPLICATION SERVICE MANAGEMENT USING CLIENT FEEDBACK IN WIRELESS NETWORK
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+5.2%)
2y 4m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 752 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month