Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/842,022

COATED TOOL AND CUTTING TOOL

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Aug 27, 2024
Priority
Feb 28, 2022 — JP 2022-030157 +1 more
Examiner
WANG, XIAOBEI
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Kyocera Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allowance Rate
445 granted / 680 resolved
+5.4% vs TC avg
Strong +48% interview lift
Without
With
+48.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
725
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
49.4%
+9.4% vs TC avg
§102
14.2%
-25.8% vs TC avg
§112
25.5%
-14.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 680 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claims 1-2 are objected to because of the following informalities: Instead of using a ‘°’, the claims use a ‘0’ superscript. Appropriate corrections are required. Claims 1-2 recite “under the periodic table”. This should be “in the periodic table” or “of the periodic table”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 1-2, 7 and 13 recite: “at least one element selected from Group 4a, 5a and 6a elements under the periodic table”. This limitation is indefinite. It is unclear whether the “at least one element” is an element selected from Group 4a, an element selected from Group 5a, and an element selected from 6a, or an element selected from Group 4a, 5a, or 6a. For purposes of examination, the latter is presumed. In addition, the claims do not specify whether the group numbering accords with the old IUPAC or the old CAS conventions, thus rendering the claims indefinite. For purposes of examination, it is presumed the claims use the old IUPAC numbering conventions, which correspond to Groups 3, 4, and 5 under modern numbering convention. Claims 7 and 13 recite: “wherein M is at least one metal selected from Group 4a, 5a and 6a elements (excluding Cr) in the periodic table and Si”. The claims are indefinite because it is unclear whether Si is part of the group of elements M is chosen from, or whether M is one of the elements, and Si is also included in M. Furthermore, Si is not a metal. For purposes of examination, Si is not part of the group of elements M is chosen from because Si is not a metal. Dependent claims are indefinite by virtue of dependence from an indefinite claim. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-14 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art of record does not teach or suggest the claimed coated tool having a difference of 10% or less the maximum between a maximum and minimum of the X-ray intensity within the claimed range for an α axis in a positive pole figure for a (111) or (200) plane. He (US 2021/0138557) discloses a coated tool having a larger difference between a maximum and minimum for the (200) plane than that claimed. Sasaki (US 2024/0227041) discloses a coated tool having a larger difference between a maximum and minimum for the (111) and (200) planes than that claimed. Yoshimi (US 2024/0181539) discloses a coated tool having a larger difference between a maximum and minimum for the (111) and (200) planes than that claimed. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to XIAOBEI WANG whose telephone number is (571)270-5705. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8AM-5PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Humera Sheikh can be reached at 571-272-0604. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /XIAOBEI WANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1784
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 27, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12741446
NON-ORIENTED ELECTRICAL STEEL SHEET
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12735786
TITANIUM DIBORIDE COATED REFRACTORY METAL COMPONENT
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12722359
ACTIVE METAL BRAZING SUBSTRATE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12700526
LAMINATE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12692202
METAL-CERAMIC SUBSTRATE, METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION THEREOF, AND MODULE
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+48.3%)
3y 2m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 680 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month