Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/842,384

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 28, 2024
Priority
Mar 17, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2022012410
Examiner
HARRISON, MONICA D
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allowance Rate
883 granted / 962 resolved
+31.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+2.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
977
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
40.0%
+0.0% vs TC avg
§102
42.4%
+2.4% vs TC avg
§112
5.4%
-34.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 962 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lee (US 2009/0140369). Regarding claim 1, Lee discloses a semiconductor device (Figure 2), comprising: a semiconductor chip (Figure 2, reference 121); and a thermistor (Figure 2, reference 130) mounted on the semiconductor chip (Figure 2, reference 121), wherein the thermistor is mounted on an insulating substrate (Figure 2, reference 150) bonded to the semiconductor chip (Figure 2, reference 121), and the semiconductor chip (Figure 2, reference 121) and the thermistor (Figure 2, reference 130) are insulated from each other by the insulating substrate (Figure 2, reference 150), and formed on the insulating substrate (Figure 2, reference 121) is at least one pattern wiring leading an electrode (Figure 2, reference 141) of the thermistor (Figure 2, reference 130) outside of the thermistor (Figure 1, reference 130) in a plan view. Regarding claim 2, Lee discloses wherein formed on the insulating substrate (Figure 2, reference 150) are the two pattern wirings (Figure 2, references 183 and 184) leading two electrodes (Figure 2, references 141 and 145) of the thermistor (Figure 2, reference 130) outside of the thermistor in a plan view, respectively. Regarding claim 3, Lee discloses wherein an effective region of the semiconductor chip (Figure 2, reference 121 outer edge area) extends to a lower side of a position where the thermistor (Figure 2, reference 130) is mounted. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee (US 2009/0140369) in view of Schweikert et al (US 2020/0321262 A1). Lee discloses all of the above claimed subject matter. However, Lee does not disclose wherein the semiconductor chip is formed using SiC (claim 4). Schweikert et al disclose wherein the semiconductor chip (Figure 1, reference 103) is formed using SiC (paragraphs 0017-0018). It would have been obvious, prior to the effective filing date of the instant application, for one having ordinary skill in the art, to modify Lee with the teachings of Schweikert et al to form a semiconductor chip with SiC because SiC, Si, SiGe, GaAs, GaN, are well known specific semiconductor materials used for semiconductor chips in the formation of semiconductor modules which may comprise AC/DC or DC/DC converter circuits, power MOS transistors, power Schottky diodes, JFETs (Junction Gate Field Effect Transistors), power bipolar transistors, logic integrated circuits, etc. Claim(s) 5 and 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee (US 2009/0140369) in view of Naka et al (US 2003/0113076 A1). Lee discloses the above independently claimed subject matter. However, Lee does not disclose wherein the semiconductor chip and the insulating substrate are bonded to each other by a bonding material containing Ag (claim 5) nor wherein the insulating substrate is formed by AlN (claim 6). Naka et al discloses wherein the semiconductor chip (Figure 6, reference 10) and the insulating substrate (Figure 6, reference 27a) are bonded to each other by a bonding material (Figure 6, reference 28) containing Ag (paragraph 0094) and wherein the insulating substrate is formed by AlN (paragraph 0087). It would have been obvious, prior to the effective filing date of the instant application, for one having ordinary skill in the art, to modify Lee with the teachings of Naka et al for the purpose of bonding an insulating substrate to a semiconductor chip by using a silver paste because the silver paste material rarely cracks from the thermal strain occurring at the bonding portions of the electronic part whereby peeling-off of the chip parts can be prevented in semiconductor devices. Also, aluminum nitride as well as silicon carbide and silicon are material used as an insulating substrate because they have a thermal expansion coefficient similar to a thermal expansion coefficient of quartz or the like constituting an optical element such as a semiconductor laser chip or a photo diode chip, or the optical fiber in semiconductor devices. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MONICA D HARRISON whose telephone number is (571)272-1959. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7-4:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joshua Benitez can be reached at 571-270-1435. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MONICA D HARRISON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2815 mdh September 11, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 28, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12751058
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD
1y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745444
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12733211
MULTILAYER INNER SPACER FOR GATE-ALL-AROUND DEVICE
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12727159
NON-VOLATILE MEMORY CELL WITH ONO COMPOUND INSULATION LAYER BETWEEN FLOATING AND CONTROL GATES AND A METHOD OF FABRICATION
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12713824
MANUFACTURING DEVICE OF DISPLAY DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD OF DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 6m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+2.7%)
2y 2m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 962 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month