Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/842,439

LID OPENING AND CLOSING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Aug 29, 2024
Priority
Mar 01, 2022 — JP 2022-031238 +1 more
Examiner
ADAMS, PHILIP CHARLES
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
U-SHIN LTD.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
69%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
39 granted / 53 resolved
+13.6% vs TC avg
Minimal -4% lift
Without
With
+-4.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
68
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
75.6%
+35.6% vs TC avg
§102
17.8%
-22.2% vs TC avg
§112
3.7%
-36.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 53 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-9 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Re: claim 1, the recited limitation “a lid that openably close the receiving port” is unclear as to the relation of the lid to the receiving port. The lid cannot be open and closed at the same time. Claims 2-9 depend on claim 1. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-9 are allowed pending overcoming the 35 U.S.C. 112(b) rejection. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Re: claim 1, the cited prior art whether in full or in combination fails to teach or reasonably suggest at the very least the locking member being rotatable about a rotation axis extending along a rotation axis of the pivoting part between a lock position in which the locking member is engaged with the engagement portion and an unlock position in which the locking member is disengaged from the engagement portion when the arm is in the retracted position. The closest cited prior art, Kaneko et al. (WO 2021075166 A1), teaches the locking member (70) being rotatable about a rotation axis extending along a rotation axis of the pivoting part (See Figs. 14 & 18) between a lock position (Fig. 14 – S0) in which the locking member is engaged with the engagement portion (44) and an unlock position (S2) in which the locking member is disengaged from the engagement portion (See Fig. 3), but fails to teach the limitation when the arm is in the retracted position. It would be unreasonable to modify this art such that the locking member has a locked and an unlocked position that would keep the arm in the retracted position. Claims 2-9 depend on claim 1. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Tanaka (US 2022/0134874 A1) discloses a similar lid opening/closing device. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PHILIP C ADAMS whose telephone number is (571)272-3421. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 7:30 - 4:00 CT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amy R Weisberg can be reached at 5712705500. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PHILIP C ADAMS/Examiner, Art Unit 3612 /AMY R WEISBERG/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3612
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 29, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679284
FOLDING AND EXTENDABLE BEAM ASSEMBLY FOR USE IN A CARGO COMPARTMENT
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673771
Doorway Side Guide System
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12673529
VEHICLE AIR CONDITIONING DUCT DEVICE
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12655606
CONSTRUCTION MACHINE
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12649407
Payload-Independent Mounting Device
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
69%
With Interview (-4.4%)
3y 0m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 53 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month