Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/842,459

SHOCK ABSORBER AND DAMPING VALVE DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 29, 2024
Priority
May 27, 2022 — JP 2022-086551 +1 more
Examiner
IRVIN, SHEA WOODROW
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Hitachi Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
48%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
8 granted / 10 resolved
+20.0% vs TC avg
Minimal -32% lift
Without
With
+-32.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
49
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
57.4%
+17.4% vs TC avg
§102
16.5%
-23.5% vs TC avg
§112
25.7%
-14.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 10 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Foreign Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2, 4-6, and 8-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kobayashi et. al. (US 20210025471 A1). Regarding Claim 1, Kobayashi discloses a shock absorber comprising: a cylinder (1) in which a working fluid is sealed; a piston (2) fitted in the cylinder (1) and partitioning an inside of the cylinder (1) (see Fig. 1); a first passage (2b) through which a flow of the working fluid occurs due to movement of the piston (2) in one direction; a first damping valve (V1) providing resistance to a flow of the working fluid from a chamber on an upstream side (R1) to a chamber on a downstream side (R2) (see Fig. 1) of the first passage (2b); a second passage (5d) through which a flow of the working fluid occurs due to movement of the piston (2) in the other direction; and a second damping disc valve (V2) providing resistance to a flow of the working fluid from a chamber on an upstream side (R2) to a chamber on a downstream side of the second passage (A) (see Annotated Fig. 4 below), wherein the second damping disc valve (V2) includes: a third passage (X) which allows constant communication between a chamber (R2) on an upstream side and a chamber on a downstream side (A); and a fourth passage (Y) communicating with a chamber on an upstream side (R2), and a variable chamber (Z) communicating with the fourth passage (Y) and partitioned by a partition member (31), which is movable according to a change in pressure of a chamber on an upstream side or a downstream side, is disposed to overlap the second damping disc valve (V2) (see Fig. 1, Annotated Fig. 4 below, Fig. 4, [0057]). PNG media_image1.png 556 811 media_image1.png Greyscale Annotated Fig. 4 Regarding Claim 2, Kobayashi discloses wherein the third passage (X) (see Annotated Fig. 4 above) and the fourth passage (Y) are formed in a valve disc (30) of the second damping disc valve (V2) seated on a seat (5h) (see Fig. 4, Annotated Fig. 4 above). Regarding Claim 4, Kobayashi discloses wherein the partition member (31) includes a relief mechanism which relieves an inside of the variable chamber (Z) (see Annotated Fig. 4 above) after a differential pressure between chambers on an upstream side and a downstream side reaches a predetermined value (see Fig. 4, Annotated Fig. 4 above, [0067]). Regarding Claim 5, Kobayashi discloses wherein the second damping disc valve (V2) is provided in a body valve (see Fig. 1, Fig. 4). Regarding Claim 6, Kobayashi discloses wherein the second damping disc valve (V2) is provided in a body valve (see Fig. 1, Fig. 4). Regarding Claim 8, Kobayashi discloses wherein the second damping disc valve (V2) is provided in a body valve (see Fig. 1, Fig. 4). Regarding Claim 9, Kobayashi discloses a damping valve device which communicates with a cylinder in which a working fluid is sealed, comprising a first passage (2b) through which a flow of the working fluid occurs due to movement of a piston (2) in the cylinder (1) in one direction; a first damping valve (V1) providing resistance to a flow of the working fluid from a chamber on an upstream side (R1) to a chamber on a downstream side of the first passage (R2); a second passage (5d) through which a flow of the working fluid occurs due to movement of the piston (2) in the other direction; and a second damping disc valve (V2) providing resistance to a flow of the working fluid from a chamber (R2) on an upstream side to a chamber on a downstream side of the second passage (A) (see Annotated Fig. 4 above), wherein the second damping disc valve (V2) has a communication passage (X) communicating with a chamber on an upstream side, and a pressure accumulation mechanism having a variable chamber (Z) which communicates with the communication passage (X) and is partitioned by a partition member (31), which is movable according to a change in pressure of a chamber on an upstream side or a downstream side, is disposed to overlap the second damping disc valve (V2) (see Fig. 1, Annotated Fig. 4 above, Fig. 4, [0057]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 3 and 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kobayashi et. al. (US 20210025471 A1) as applied in Claim 2, above, in view of Grundei (US 5615756 A). Regarding Claim 3, Kobayashi discloses wherein the partition member (31) is formed of a deformable annular plate, and the variable chamber (Z) (see Annotated Fig. 4 above) formed between the partition member (31) and the valve disc (30) increases during an extension stroke of the piston (2), and the variable chamber (31) decreases during a compression stroke (see Fig. 4, Annotated Fig. 4 above, [0076], [0096], [0110]). Kobayashi does not explicitly disclose wherein the deformable annular plate is a “disc spring”. Grundei discloses a shock absorber and valve arrangement wherein a partition member (417) is formed of a disc spring (see Fig. 1). It would have been obvious, to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the invention, to combine the teaching of using a disc spring as a partition member of Grundei with the shock absorber of Kobayashi in order to combine the partition function with built in pre-stressing and biasing of the other valve disc components, allowing further control of dampening characteristics and reducing the need for separate biasing components (see US 5615756 A [Grundei]; 5: 54-57, 6: 1-24). Regarding Claim 7, Kobayashi modified by Grundei teaches wherein the second damping disc valve (V2) is provided in a body valve (see US 20210025471 A1 [Kobayashi]; Fig. 1, Fig. 4). Prior Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Yang (US 20070170028 A1) discloses a shock absorber and damping valve arrangement with a variable chamber and a disc spring. Yabe (US 20110290603 A1) discloses a shock absorber and damping valve arrangement with a variable chamber. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Shea Irvin whose telephone number is (571)272-9952. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7:30 - 17:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert Siconolfi can be reached at (571) 272-7124. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /S.W.I./Examiner, Art Unit 3616 /Robert A. Siconolfi/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3616
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 29, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12715409
BLEED VALVE AND BRAKE SYSTEMS USING SAME
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 1 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
48%
With Interview (-32.1%)
2y 3m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 10 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month