Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/842,522

FLUID ANALYSIS SYSTEM, WATER-CONDUCTING HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCE AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING A CONCENTRATION

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Aug 29, 2024
Priority
Mar 01, 2022 — DE 10 2022 104 818.7 +1 more
Examiner
NICOLAS, FREDERICK C
Art Unit
3754
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
AMS-OSRAM AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
1050 granted / 1292 resolved
+11.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
1317
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
33.7%
-6.3% vs TC avg
§102
33.5%
-6.5% vs TC avg
§112
24.7%
-15.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1292 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Preliminary Amendment 2. The preliminary amendment filed on 8/29/2024 has been entered. Specification 3. The abstract of the disclosure is objected to because of legal language “means”. A corrected abstract of the disclosure is required and must be presented on a separate sheet, apart from any other text. See MPEP § 608.01(b). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 4. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. 5. Claims 1-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. I- Claim 1 is indefinite because “the resultant fluorescence” lacks proper antecedent basis. II- Regarding claim 3, the phrase “in particular” (line 2) renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitation(s) following the phrase is part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). III- Regarding claim 4, the phrase “in particular” (line 2) renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitation(s) following the phrase is part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). IV- Regarding claim 6, the phrase “in particular” (line 6) renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitation(s) following the phrase is part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). V- Regarding claim 7, the phrase “in particular” (lines 4 and 10) renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitation(s) following the phrase is part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). VI- In claim 7, lines 9-10, “means of fluorescence spectroscopy” is positively recited for a second time. This renders the claims confusing as it raises issues of double inclusion. VII- Claim 9 is indefinite because “the UV domain” lacks proper antecedent basis. VIII- In claim 15, lines 1-2, “a fluid analysis system” is positively recited for a second time. This renders the claims confusing as it raises issues of double inclusion. IX- Claim 17 is indefinite because “the resultant fluorescence” lacks proper antecedent basis. Allowable Subject Matter 6. Claims 1-17 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Conclusion 7. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicants' disclosure. 8. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FREDERICK C NICOLAS whose telephone number is (571)272-4931. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 8:00 AM -: 4:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Paul R. Durand can be reached at 571-272-4459. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FREDERICK C NICOLAS/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3754
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 29, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12741860
FEEDING DEVICE FOR INTELLIGENT COOKING MACHINE
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12734540
Thin-Walled Tube for Dispensing Apparatus
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12722865
CAPSULE FOR CONTAINING AND DISPENSING FOR FLASKS
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12722859
CAP SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12715755
ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY METHOD OF SUPPLYING WINE AT A DISPENSING LOCATION, WINE DISPENSING SYSTEM AND CABINET
3y 11m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+12.7%)
2y 5m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1292 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month