Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 18/842,561

PHOTOVOLTAIC MODULE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 29, 2024
Priority
Sep 12, 2022 — JP 2022-144528 +1 more
Examiner
TRINH, THANH TRUC
Art Unit
1726
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Sharp Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
22%
Grant Probability
At Risk
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 3m
Est. Remaining
33%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 22% of cases
22%
Career Allowance Rate
178 granted / 809 resolved
-43.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 3m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
875
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
49.7%
+9.7% vs TC avg
§102
16.5%
-23.5% vs TC avg
§112
26.5%
-13.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 809 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 6/5/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 1-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee et al. (US 2012/0262948) in view of Lu et al. (US 2011/0240100). Regarding claim 1, Lee et al. discloses a photovoltaic module (figs. 1-5) comprising: a photovoltaic string (see the array of solar cells 130 in figs. 1 and 3-4); and a terminal box (see junction box 200, figs. 2, 4-6); wherein the photovoltaic string comprises a plurality of photovoltaic cells (130, figs. 1 and 3-4) connected in series with each other (see figs. 1-5, [0029]), a plurality of photovoltaic cell connection units (see 2 adjacent columns of cells in annotated fig. 1 below) in each of which the plurality of photovoltaic cells (130) adjacent to each other in a first direction (or vertical direction) is connected in series to each other (see figs. 1-5, [0029]), and one or more turn-back portion (145b and 145d, see annotated fig. 1 below, also see fig. 4) at which two of the plurality of photovoltaic cell connection units (or two adjacent columns of cells) are connected in series to each other (see figs. 1 and 4, and [0029] as Lee et al. teaches solar cells 130 are connected in series), wherein the two photovoltaic cell connection units (or two adjacent columns of cells) being adjacent to each other in a second direction (horizontal direction) orthogonal to the first direction (or vertical direction, see figs. 1-5); and wherein the terminal box (see junction box 200, figs. 2, 4-6) comprising a plurality of bypass diodes (see bypass diodes Da, Db and Dc, figs. 1-6, [0032], [0041], [0045-0046], [0056-0058], [0068]); wherein each of one or more turn-back portion (145b and 145d) is provided with an output wiring member (135b and 135c, see figs. 1-2, 4-6) such that one or more turn-back portions (145b and 145d) are provided with one or more output wiring members (135b and 135c, see figs. 1, 3 and 4); wherein each of the plurality of photovoltaic cell connection units (or two adjacent columns of the cells 130) is connected in parallel with corresponding one of the bypass diodes (Da, Db, Dc; see annotated fig. 1 and fig. 4). PNG media_image1.png 1018 596 media_image1.png Greyscale Lee et al. shows the photovoltaic cells are arranged in two columns in each photovoltaic cell connection units. Lee et al. does not show the photovoltaic cells being arranged in a column in the first direction in each photovoltaic connection units. Lu et al. shows the photovoltaic cells (10) being arranged in a column in the first direction in each photovoltaic connection units (101, 102, 103…, see fig. 2). It would have been obvious to one skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the photovoltaic module of Lee et al. by rearranging the photovoltaic cells in a column in each photovoltaic connection units as taught by Lu et al., because such modification is a mere rearrangement of the system parts that would not modify the operation of the system, and would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made. See In re Japikse, 181 F.2d 1019, 86 USPQ 70 (CCPA 1950). Regarding claim 2, modified Lee et al. discloses a photovoltaic module as in claim 1 above, wherein Lee et al. teaches each of the plurality of photovoltaic cell connection units (or two adjacent columns of cells 130, see annotated fig. 1 above) comprises a bus bar (145b or 145d) to a starting end or terminating end of a corresponding one of the plurality of photovoltaic cell connection units such that the plurality of photovoltaic cell connection units comprises a plurality of bus bars (145b and 145d) including the bus bar (145b or 145d, see annotated fig. 1 above), and all of the plurality of bus bars (or 145b or 145d) are connected to the one or more output wiring members (135b and 135c, see annotated figs. 1-6) Regarding claim 3, modified Lee et al. discloses a photovoltaic module as in claim 2 above, wherein Lee et al. teaches the terminal box (200) comprises a plurality of terminals (a, b, c, d) connected to the plurality of bypass diodes (Da, Db, Dc), and the output wiring member (135b or 135c) has an end thereof connected to the bus bar (145b or 145d) and has another end thereof connected, directly or via a connection cable, to corresponding one of the terminals (a, b, c, d; see figs. 1-6). Regarding claim 4, modified Lee et al. discloses a photovoltaic module as in claim 1 above, wherein Lee et al. teaches the photovoltaic string comprises the plurality of photovoltaic cell connection units (or two adjacent columns of cells) in the first direction (or vertical direction, see figs. 1, 3-4). Regarding claim 5, modified Lee et al. discloses a photovoltaic module as in claim 1 above, wherein Lee et al. shows the photovoltaic string (140) is sealed between a transparent substrate (see front substrate 160, fig. 3, [0026], [0040]) and a back surface protection member (see rear substrate 110, fig. 3, [0026] and [0036]), and the output wiring member (135b or 135c) is arranged between the plurality of photovoltaic cell connection units (or two adjacent columns of the cells) and the back surface protection member (see rear substrate 110, fig. 3) and is led out to the terminal box (200, see fig. 2). Regarding claim 6, modified Lee et al. discloses a photovoltaic module as in claim 1 above, wherein Lee et al. teaches the photovoltaic string (140) is sealed between a transparent substrate (see front substrate 160, fig. 3, [0026], [0040] and a back surface protection member (see rear substrate 110, fig. 3, [0026] and [0036]), and the output wiring member (135b or 135c) penetrates the back surface protection member (110) via openings to the terminal box (200, fig. 2, [0032]) to be drawn out to an outside of the back surface protection member, and is connected to the terminal box via a connection cable (135d, 135c, 135b, 135a, see fig. 2, [0032]). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-6 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Applicant argues Lee does not teach arranging the photovoltaic cells in a column in each photovoltaic connection unit as claimed. However, Applicant’s arguments are moot in view of the new ground of rejection. See the rejection above. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THANH-TRUC TRINH whose telephone number is (571)272-6594. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00am - 6:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jeffrey T. Barton can be reached at 5712721307. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. THANH-TRUC TRINH Primary Examiner Art Unit 1726 /THANH TRUC TRINH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1726
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 5 earlier events
Dec 15, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 06, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Mar 04, 2026
Interview Requested
Mar 19, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 19, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jun 05, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 09, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12696550
POWER ROUTING MODULE WITH A SWITCHING MATRIX FOR A SOLAR CELL ARRAY
9y 0m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12683548
DECOUPLING OF A PEROVSKITE SOLAR CELL IN DARKNESS
4y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12635284
SOLAR CELL AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
10y 2m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12598838
SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR ACHIEVING A MICRO LOUVER EFFECT IN A PHOTOVOLTAIC CELL
8y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598835
SOLAR CELL AND PRODUCTION METHOD THEREOF, PHOTOVOLTAIC MODULE
3y 8m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
22%
Grant Probability
33%
With Interview (+11.3%)
4y 3m (~2y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 809 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month