Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/842,561

PHOTOVOLTAIC MODULE

Final Rejection §102§112
Filed
Aug 29, 2024
Examiner
TRINH, THANH TRUC
Art Unit
1726
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
2 (Final)
22%
Grant Probability
At Risk
3-4
OA Rounds
4y 9m
To Grant
34%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 22% of cases
22%
Career Allow Rate
177 granted / 797 resolved
-42.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 9m
Avg Prosecution
66 currently pending
Career history
863
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
48.4%
+8.4% vs TC avg
§102
17.8%
-22.2% vs TC avg
§112
25.3%
-14.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 797 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of claims The amendment to claims filed on 12/15/2025 is acknowledged. Claims 1-3, 5-6 are amended. Currently, claims 1-6 are pending in the application. Previous prior art rejection is modified to address the above amendment. Claims 1-6 are rejected. See the rejection below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 2-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 2 depends on claim 1 and recites “each of the plurality of photovoltaic cell connection units comprises a bus bar connected to a starting end or a terminal end of one corresponding one of the plurality of photovoltaic cell connection units, such that the plurality of photovoltaic cell connection units comprises a plurality of bus bars, including the bus bar, and all of the plurality of bus bars are connected to the one or more output wiring members” (emphasis added) in lines 1-7, while claim 1 recites “one or more turn-back portions, at each of which two of the plurality of photovoltaic cell connection units are connected in series to each other” in lines 10-11 and “each of the one or more-turn back portions is provided with an output wiring member such that the one or more turn back portions are provided with one or more output wiring members” in lines 17-19. As such, it is unclear if “a bus bar … a plurality of bus bars” recited in claim 2 is the same as or different from “one or more turn back portions” recited in claim 1. Claim 3 is rejected on the same ground as claim 2. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/(2) as being anticipated by Lee et al. (US 2012/0262948). Regarding claim 1, Lee et al. discloses a photovoltaic module (figs. 1-5) comprising: a photovoltaic string (see the array of solar cells 130 in figs. 1 and 3-4); and a terminal box (see junction box 200, figs. 2, 4-6); wherein the photovoltaic string comprises a plurality of photovoltaic cells (130, figs. 1 and 3-4) connected in series with each other (see figs. 1-5, [0029]), a plurality of photovoltaic cell connection units (see 2 adjacent columns of cells in annotated fig. 1 below) in each of which the plurality of photovoltaic cells (130) adjacent to each other in a first direction (or vertical direction) is connected in series to each other (see figs. 1-5, [0029]), and one or more turn-back portion (145b and 145d, see annotated fig. 1 below, also see fig. 4) at which two of the plurality of photovoltaic cell connection units (or two adjacent columns of cells) are connected in series to each other (see figs. 1 and 4, and [0029] as Lee et al. teaches solar cells 130 are connected in series), wherein the two photovoltaic cell connection units (or two adjacent columns of cells) being adjacent to each other in a second direction (horizontal direction) orthogonal to the first direction (or vertical direction, see figs. 1-5); and wherein the terminal box (see junction box 200, figs. 2, 4-6) comprising a plurality of bypass diodes (see bypass diodes Da, Db and Dc, figs. 1-6, [0032], [0041], [0045-0046], [0056-0058], [0068]); wherein each of one or more turn-back portion (145b and 145d) is provided with an output wiring member (135b and 135c, see figs. 1-2, 4-6) such that one or more turn-back portions (145b and 145d) are provided with one or more output wiring members (135b and 135c, see figs. 1, 3 and 4); wherein each of the plurality of photovoltaic cell connection units (or two adjacent columns of the cells 130) is connected in parallel with corresponding one of the bypass diodes (Da, Db, Dc; see annotated fig. 1 and fig. 4). PNG media_image1.png 1018 596 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 2, Lee et al. discloses a photovoltaic module as in claim 1 above, and teaches each of the plurality of photovoltaic cell connection units (or two adjacent columns of cells 130, see annotated fig. 1 above) comprises a bus bar (145b or 145d) to a starting end or terminating end of a corresponding one of the plurality of photovoltaic cell connection units such that the plurality of photovoltaic cell connection units comprises a plurality of bus bars (145b and 145d) including the bus bar (145b or 145d, see annotated fig. 1 above), and all of the plurality of bus bars (or 145b or 145d) are connected to the one or more output wiring members (135b and 135c, see annotated figs. 1-6) Regarding claim 3, Lee et al. discloses a photovoltaic module as in claim 2 above, and teaches the terminal box (200) comprises a plurality of terminals (a, b, c, d) connected to the plurality of bypass diodes (Da, Db, Dc), and the output wiring member (135b or 135c) has an end thereof connected to the bus bar (145b or 145d) and has another end thereof connected, directly or via a connection cable, to corresponding one of the terminals (a, b, c, d; see figs. 1-6). Regarding claim 4, Lee et al. discloses a photovoltaic module as in claim 1 above, and teaches the photovoltaic string comprises the plurality of photovoltaic cell connection units (or two adjacent columns of cells) in the first direction (or vertical direction, see figs. 1, 3-4). Regarding claim 5, Lee et al. discloses a photovoltaic module as in claim 1 above, and shows the photovoltaic string (140) is sealed between a transparent substrate (see front substrate 160, fig. 3, [0026], [0040]) and a back surface protection member (see rear substrate 110, fig. 3, [0026] and [0036]), and the output wiring member (135b or 135c) is arranged between the plurality of photovoltaic cell connection units (or two adjacent columns of the cells) and the back surface protection member (see rear substrate 110, fig. 3) and is led out to the terminal box (200, see fig. 2). Regarding claim 6, Lee et al. discloses a photovoltaic module as in claim 1 above, and teaches the photovoltaic string (140) is sealed between a transparent substrate (see front substrate 160, fig. 3, [0026], [0040] and a back surface protection member (see rear substrate 110, fig. 3, [0026] and [0036]), and the output wiring member (135b or 135c) penetrates the back surface protection member (110) via openings to the terminal box (200, fig. 2, [0032]) to be drawn out to an outside of the back surface protection member, and is connected to the terminal box via a connection cable (135d, 135c, 135b, 135a, see fig. 2, [0032]). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 12/15/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues Lee does not “each of the one or more turn back portions is provided with an output wiring member such that the one or more turn back portions are provided with one or more output wiring members” as claimed, because Lee shows the turn back portions at the bottom of the panel, e.g. 145a, 145c and 145e, are not provided with an output wiring member. The examiner replies that Lee teaches the turn back portions 145b and 145d each provided with an output wiring member 135b and 135c. Also see the rejection above. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THANH-TRUC TRINH whose telephone number is (571)272-6594. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00am - 6:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jeffrey T. Barton can be reached at 5712721307. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. THANH-TRUC TRINH Primary Examiner Art Unit 1726 /THANH TRUC TRINH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1726
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 29, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 11, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112
Nov 27, 2025
Interview Requested
Dec 08, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Dec 08, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Dec 15, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 02, 2026
Final Rejection — §102, §112
Mar 04, 2026
Interview Requested
Mar 19, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 19, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598838
SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR ACHIEVING A MICRO LOUVER EFFECT IN A PHOTOVOLTAIC CELL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598835
SOLAR CELL AND PRODUCTION METHOD THEREOF, PHOTOVOLTAIC MODULE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12587129
ELEVATED DUAL-AXIS PHOTOVOLTAIC SOLAR TRACKING ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12570669
ORGANIC SOLAR CELL AND PHOTODETECTOR MATERIALS AND DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12507488
PV Module with Film Layer Comprising Hydrophobic-Treated Fumed Silica
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 23, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
22%
Grant Probability
34%
With Interview (+11.8%)
4y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 797 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month