Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/842,867

FINGER SUB-ASSEMBLY FOR A ROBOTIC MANIPULATOR

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 30, 2024
Priority
Mar 03, 2022 — GB 2202957.3 +1 more
Examiner
RIVERA, WILLIAM ARAUZ
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Ocado Innovation Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
966 granted / 1297 resolved
+14.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
1318
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
42.5%
+2.5% vs TC avg
§102
28.1%
-11.9% vs TC avg
§112
19.7%
-20.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1297 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2, 7, and 16-17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Fang et al (CN 108 890 633), hereinafter “Fang”. With respect to Claim 1, Fang, Figures 1-2, teaches a finger sub-assembly for a gripper assembly, the finger sub- assembly comprising: a base unit 6 configured to be connectable to a gripper assembly by a mount 1; and; a high-friction pad 10 for contacting an article during article manipulation, wherein the high-friction pad is mechanically secured to the base unit 1 and configured to prevent relative movement between the base unit 1 and an article to be manipulated. With respect to Claim 2, Fang further teaches wherein the base unit comprises: a cutout (See Figure 2) defining a recessed area into which the high-friction pad is received. With respect to Claim 7, Fang further teaches wherein the high-friction pad comprises: a rigid plate overmolded by a high-friction material, and wherein the base unit includes: longitudinal undercuts 8 into which parts of the rigid plate are received when the high- friction pad 10 is received in the cutout. With respect to Claim 16, Fang further teaches a finger sub-assembly according to Claim 1 in combination with a gripper assembly configured for manipulating an article. With respect to Claim 17, Fang further teaches a finger sub-assembly in combination with a gripper assembly according to Claim 16 configured as a robotic manipulator. Claim(s) 1, 2, 11, and 16-17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Yi et al (CN 108 890 633), hereinafter “Yi”. With respect to Claim 1, Yi, Figures 1-5, teaches a finger sub-assembly for a gripper assembly, the finger sub- assembly comprising: a base unit 1 configured to be connectable to a gripper assembly by a mount (See Figure 1); and a high-friction pad 3 for contacting an article during article manipulation, wherein the high-friction pad is mechanically secured to the base unit 1 and configured to prevent relative movement between the base unit 1 and an article to be manipulated. With respect to Claim 2, Yi further teaches wherein the base unit comprises: a cutout 2 defining a recessed area into which the high-friction pad 3 is received. With respect to Claim 11, Yi further teaches wherein the cutout comprises: an open end through which the high-friction pad is received. With respect to Claim 16, Yi further teaches a finger sub-assembly according to Claim 1 in combination with a gripper assembly configured for manipulating an article. With respect to Claim 17, Yi further teaches a finger sub-assembly in combination with a gripper assembly according to Claim 16 configured as a robotic manipulator. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-6, 8-10, 12-15, and 18-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WILLIAM ARAUZ RIVERA whose telephone number is (571)272-6953. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday 9:00 AM to 8:00 PM MDT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Victoria P. Augustine can be reached at 313-446-4858. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /WILLIAM A. RIVERA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3654
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 30, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747128
COILER DEVICE FOR WINDING A STRIP OF CUSHIONING MATERIAL
2y 12m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12740675
ROLLED PRODUCT DISPENSER AND BUSHING FOR A ROLLED PRODUCT
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12740674
AN OUTLET ASSEMBLY FOR A DISPENSER FOR WEB-SHAPED ABSORBENT MATERIAL
1y 12m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12734711
Electrostatically-Enhanced Friction-Gripping End Effector
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12729093
Reel Chock
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+7.3%)
2y 6m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1297 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month