Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/843,049

FOOD PORTIONING MACHINE AND METHODS OF OPERATION THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 30, 2024
Examiner
DONG, LIANG
Art Unit
3724
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Thurne-Middleby Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
52%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 52% of resolved cases
52%
Career Allow Rate
250 granted / 480 resolved
-17.9% vs TC avg
Strong +32% interview lift
Without
With
+32.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
68 currently pending
Career history
548
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
51.6%
+11.6% vs TC avg
§102
21.0%
-19.0% vs TC avg
§112
25.4%
-14.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 480 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed in Application No. 18843049, filed on 8/30/2024. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 8/30/2024 was filed on the filing date of the application on 8/30/2024. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement has been considered by the examiner. Claim Objections Claims 2-6 and 8 are objected to because of the following informalities: Regarding claims 2-6, “A machine” should be “The food portioning machine” to avoid lack of antecedent basis issues. Regarding claim 8, “A method” should be “The method” to avoid lack of antecedent basis issues. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2 and 7-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Volkl (US 2018037005 A1) Regarding claim 1, Volkl teaches a food portioning machine comprising: a machine base (machine base of 1); a feeder (assembly of 17 and 13) for feeding a food product in a feed direction (10’, see Figure 1A); a cutter (3) for cutting portions from a leading end of a food product fed towards the cutter by the feeder (see Figure 1A-D); and a portion thickness control assembly (paragraph 0038) comprising: a carriage (17, see Figure 1A) carried by the machine base and able to move relative to the machine base in order to adjust the thickness of each portion to be cut from the food product (paragraph 0118); a carriage drive assembly (drive for 17) coupled to the carriage to move the carriage relative to the machine base (drive for movement of 10’, paragraph 0095); a product stop (13) carried by the carriage and able to move relative to the carriage between advanced and retracted positions (see Figures 1A-D, paragraph 0088); and a product stop drive assembly (assembly for moving 13) coupled to the product stop to move the product stop between the advanced and retracted positions (paragraph 0088), such that, before the cutter starts to cut a next portion from the leading end of the food product, the carriage drive assembly is operable to move the carriage to a position relative to the machine base with reference to the thickness of the next portion to be cut, and the product stop drive assembly is operable to move the product stop from its retracted position to its advanced position for engagement by the leading end of the food product (paragraph 0010, 0046 and 0090). Regarding claim 2, Volkl teaches the carriage is able to move relative to the machine base in a direction parallel to the feed direction in order to adjust the thickness of each portion to be cut from the food product (See Figure 1A-D). Regarding claim 7, Volkl teaches the steps of: a) moving the carriage relative to the support with the carriage drive assembly to adjust the thickness of a next portion to be cut from a food product (paragraph 0010, 0046 and 0090); b) moving the product stop to the advanced position with the product stop drive assembly (paragraph 0010, 0046 and 0090); and c) feeding the food product in the feed direction with the feeder until its leading end engages the product stop (paragraph 0010, 0046 and 0090). Regarding claim 8, Volkl teaches the steps of: d) after step c), starting to cut the next portion from the leading end of the food product (paragraph 0010, 0046 and 0090); and e) after step d), moving the product stop towards its retracted position with the product stop drive assembly before the next portion has been completely cut from the leading end of the food product (paragraph 0010, 0046 and 0090). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-6 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Regarding claim 3, Volkl teaches all elements of the current invention as set forth in claim 1 stated above. Volkl fails to teach the product stop drive assembly includes a rotary actuator and a mechanical coupling arranged to couple the rotary actuator to the product stop so that the rotary actuator is operable to move the product stop between the advanced and retracted positions. While Volkl provided the product stop drive assembly for controlling the cutting thickness, Volkl fails to teach details of a rotary actuator and a mechanical coupling arranged to couple the rotary actuator to the product stop so that the rotary actuator is operable to move the product stop between the advanced and retracted positions. Furthermore, no additional prior art could be found to teach the claimed limitations either alone nor in combination to further modify the device of Volkl. Thus claim 3 is allowable, claim 4 is allowable by virtue of its dependency on claim 3. Regarding claim 5, Volkl teaches all elements of the current invention as set forth in claim 1 stated above. Volkl fails to teach the product stop is mechanically coupled to the carriage by a pair of rigid arms, with a carriage end of each rigid arm being rotatably coupled to the carriage and a stop end of each rigid arm being rotatably coupled to the product stop, the carriage ends of the rigid arms are rotatable relative to the carriage about respective first and second pivotal axes, the stop ends of the rigid arms are rotatable relative to the product stop about respective third and fourth pivotal axes, the first to fourth pivotal axes are parallel to each other and perpendicular to the feed direction. While Volkl provided the product stop drive assembly for controlling the cutting thickness, Volkl fails to teach details of the product stop is mechanically coupled to the carriage by a pair of rigid arms, with a carriage end of each rigid arm being rotatably coupled to the carriage and a stop end of each rigid arm being rotatably coupled to the product stop, the carriage ends of the rigid arms are rotatable relative to the carriage about respective first and second pivotal axes, the stop ends of the rigid arms are rotatable relative to the product stop about respective third and fourth pivotal axes, the first to fourth pivotal axes are parallel to each other and perpendicular to the feed direction. Furthermore, no additional prior art could be found to teach the claimed limitations either alone nor in combination to further modify the device of Volkl. Thus claim 5 is allowable, claim 6 is allowable by virtue of its dependency on claim 5. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LIANG DONG whose telephone number is (571)270-0479. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 8 AM-6 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ashley Boyer can be reached at 571-272-4502. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LIANG DONG/Examiner, Art Unit 3724 3/17/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 30, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600053
CUTTING TOOL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600048
AUTOMATICALLY RETRACTING SCRAPER WITH BLADE STOP
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12589513
MACHINE FOR CUTTING DECORATIONS FOR FRUSTOCONICAL BODIES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589522
FLOOR CUTTING MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12563996
HOLDING DEVICE FOR AN ASSEMBLY THAT IS TO BE FRACTURED
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
52%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+32.2%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 480 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month