Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/843,069

ROTARY SHIFT DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 30, 2024
Examiner
WEBER, GREGORY ROBERT
Art Unit
3618
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Kabushiki Kaisha Tokai-Rika-Denki-Seisakusho
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
268 granted / 353 resolved
+23.9% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
367
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
39.5%
-0.5% vs TC avg
§102
29.3%
-10.7% vs TC avg
§112
28.9%
-11.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 353 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2 and 4-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Nagashima (JP 2019-105318-A). Regarding Claim 1, Nagashima discloses a rotary shift device (8) comprising: A rotatable shift selector (8b). An operation unit rotatable (8c, 8d, or 8e) in conjunction with rotation of the shift selector (see Fig. 2). Regarding Claim 2, Nagashima further discloses the rotary shift device according to claim 1, wherein the operation unit is operable at a plurality of rotational positions of the shift selector (see [0033] of the translation, disclosing that when not in the R range, the R button 8d is pressed and then shifter is then moved to the R position). Regarding Claim 4, Nagashima further discloses the rotary shift device according to claim 1, comprising a restricting portion (5) that restricts an operation of the operation unit at a predetermined rotational position of the shift selector (see [0034] of the translation). Regarding Claim 5, Nagashima further discloses the rotary shift device according to claim 1, wherein an operation direction of the operation unit is different from a rotation direction of the shift selector (see Fig. 3, showing a downward arrow for the operation unit and a rotational direction for the shift selector). Regarding Claim 6, Nagashima further discloses the rotary shift device according to claim 1, wherein, by operating the operation unit, rotation of the shift selector or movement of a vehicle is restricted or released from restriction (see [0033] and [0034] of the translation). Regarding Claim 7, Nagashima further discloses the rotary shift device according to claim 1, wherein, by operating the operation unit, an instruction of a shift range position corresponding to a rotational position of the shift selector is restricted or released from restriction (see [0033] and [0034] of the translation). Regarding Claim 8, Nagashima further discloses the rotary shift device according to claim 1, wherein, by rotating the shift selector and operating the operation unit, an instruction of a shift range position corresponding to a rotational position of the shift selector is restricted or released from restriction (see [0033] and [0034] of the translation; see also Fig. 3). Regarding Claim 9, Nagashima further discloses the rotary shift device according to claim 1, wherein, by rotating the shift selector while operating the operation unit, an instruction of a shift range position corresponding to a rotational position of the shift selector is restricted or released from restriction (see [0033] and [0034] of the translation, discloses that the button has to be pressed and the shifter rotated for the gear change to be allowed, accordingly both signals must be present and active to allow the change). Regarding Claim 10, Nagashima further discloses the rotary shift device according to claim 1, wherein, by operating the operation unit and then rotating the shift selector, an instruction of a shift range position corresponding to a rotational position of the shift selector is restricted or released from restriction (see [0047] of the translation). Claims 1 and 3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Shamoto (JP 2002-052948-A), Regarding Claim 1, Shamoto discloses a rotary shift device (see Figs. 2 and 3) comprising: A rotatable shift selector (16). An operation unit rotatable (17) in conjunction with rotation of the shift selector (see Figs. 2 and 3). Regarding Claim 3, Shamoto further discloses the rotary shift device according to claim 1, further comprising an abutting member (27) on which a downstream side of the operation unit in an operation direction abuts (see Fig. 3), wherein an abutting surface of the abutting member is wider than an abutting surface (29) of the operation unit (see Fig. 3). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GREGORY WEBER whose telephone number is (571)272-3307. The examiner can normally be reached 9AM - 5PM M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, MINNAH SEOH can be reached at (571) 270-7778. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GREGORY ROBERT WEBER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3618
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 30, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 27, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594680
FLEXIBLE STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590624
MANUAL SCREW SHAFT DRIVING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12576543
SOFT ROBOTICS, AUTONOMOUS, SPACE INSPECTION, CRAWLING ROBOT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12560225
MOTORIZED SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12560226
LINEAR DRIVE MECHANISM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+16.1%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 353 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month