Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/843,886

LIGHTWEIGHT CONTAINER

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Sep 04, 2024
Priority
Mar 06, 2022 — provisional 63/317,057 +1 more
Examiner
GRANO, ERNESTO ARTURIO
Art Unit
3735
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Mid-America Machining Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
61%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 61% of resolved cases
61%
Career Allowance Rate
606 granted / 990 resolved
-8.8% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+25.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1024
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
51.9%
+11.9% vs TC avg
§102
23.8%
-16.2% vs TC avg
§112
22.2%
-17.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 990 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-2, 4, 6-15, 19-23 and 26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation "wherein the four side walls include two major side walls and two minor side walls" in lines 12 and 13. This limitation is confusing and indefinite because it is unknown if the previously claimed four sides include an additional two major sides and two minor sides as previously claimed, this appears to be addressing the same limitation and would not have to be repeated for the purpose of examination the Examiner is interpreting this limitation as follows : wherein the four side walls include two major side walls and two minor side walls, when measured in transverse cross-section the major side walls have an overall width substantially greater than an overall width of the minor side walls and the minor side walls have an overall width that is substantially the same as an overall width of the intermediate walls, and wherein an average wall thickness ratio of the thickness of the intermediate walls to the thickness of the major side walls of the container being greater than 0.85. Also see claims 4 and 8-10 for the same repeated limitation "wherein the four side walls include two major side walls and two minor side walls". This limitation is confusing and indefinite because it is unknown if the previously claimed four sides include an additional two major sides and two minor sides as previously claimed. The examiner is interpreting this limitation is the same way as discussed above in claim 1. Claims 2, 6-7, 11-15, 19-23 and 26 directly or indirectly depend from claim 1. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 16-17 and allowed. Claim 1 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Claims 2, 4, 6-15, 19-23 and 26 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ERNESTO A GRANO whose telephone number is (571)270-3927. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:00-3:30 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anthony Stashick can be reached at (571)272-4561. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ERNESTO A GRANO/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3735
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 04, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 19, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Feb 19, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 07, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Apr 28, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 07, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 11, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12767403
BARRIER LAMINATE, LID MATERIAL, AND PACKAGING CONTAINER
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12745597
SUBSTRATE STORING CONTAINER AND LID-BODY-SIDE SUBSTRATE SUPPORT PART
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12715671
INTEGRATED LIQUID CONTAINER SYSTEM AND METHOD OF ASSEMBLY THEREOF
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12709443
CLOSURE ASSEMBLY WITH A CAP HAVING CORRUGATED WINGS
1y 8m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12708823
GOLF BAG WITH TOP CUFF
1y 8m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
61%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+25.3%)
3y 1m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 990 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month