Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 18/843,922

ORGANIC LIGHT-EMITTING COMPOSITE AND METHOD FOR PATTERNING ORGANIC LIGHT-EMITTING THIN FILM COMPRISING SAME, ORGANIC LIGHT-EMITTING COMPOSITION COMPRISING SAME, AND ORGANIC LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE COMPRISING SAME

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 04, 2024
Priority
Mar 04, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0028349 +2 more
Examiner
DANG, PHUC T
Art Unit
2897
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Iucf-hyu (industry-university Cooperation Foundation Hanyang University)
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
96%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 96% — above average
96%
Career Allowance Rate
1766 granted / 1850 resolved
+27.5% vs TC avg
Minimal +1% lift
Without
With
+1.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
1879
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
60.8%
+20.8% vs TC avg
§102
26.0%
-14.0% vs TC avg
§112
9.6%
-30.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1850 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Cross-Reference to Related Applications 2. This application is a 371 of PCT/KR2023/002902 03/03/2023. Preliminary amendment 3. Preliminary amendment filed on 09/04/2024 has been acknowledged and considered. In the Preliminary amendment, the applicants have amended claims 5, 7, 11-16, 18 and 21 and canceled claims 20 and 22 and remained claims 1-4, 6, 98=10, 17 and 19. Claims 1-19 and 21 are currently pending in the application. Oath/Declaration 4. The oath/declaration filed on 09/04/2024 is acceptable. Priority 5. Receipt is acknowledged of papers submitted under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d), which papers have been placed of record in the file. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 6. Claim 13 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over WRIGHT C (WO-2015089062) in view of CHOI H (WO-2019143230-A1) and further in view of CHOI Y (KR-20030030792-A). Regarding claim 13, WRIGHT C discloses a patterning method for an organic light-emitting thin film, the patterning method comprising: forming an organic light-emitting thin film (24) (see corresponding organic thin-film layer (340) in the functional layer (300) in ZHANG Z (WO-2019128948-A1) on a substrate (20); forming a photoresist (26) on the organic light-emitting thin film (24); patterning the photoresist (26) to form a photoresist pattern (32); dry-etching the organic light-emitting thin film (24) using the photoresist pattern (32) as an etching mask (30) to form an organic light-emitting pattern (46); and removing the photoresist (40) (Figs. 3A-3F and English Text). WRIGHT C discloses the features of the claimed invention as discussed above, but does not disclose forming an organic light-emitting thin film comprising an organic light- emitting composite. CHOI H, however, disclose forming an organic light-emitting thin film (101) comprising an organic light- emitting composite (100) (Fig. 6 and English Text). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teaching of WRIGHT C to provide an organic light-emitting thin film comprising an organic light- emitting composite as taught by CHOI H for a purpose of improving luminous light efficiency for the patterned method for an organic light-emitting thin film. WRIGHT C and CHOI H disclose the features of the claimed invention as discussed above but does not disclose dry-etching the organic light-emitting thin film. CHOI Y, however, discloses dry-etching the organic light-emitting thin film (24) (Figs. 4d-4e and English Text). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teaching of WRIGHT and CHOI H to provide dry-etching the organic light-emitting thin film as taught by CHOI Y for a purpose of exposing the patterned organic light-emitting thin film for the patterned method for an organic light-emitting thin film. 7. Claim 17 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over WRIGHT C, CHOI H and CHOI Y in view of CHEN R (KR-20070006617-A). Regarding claim 17, WRIGHT C, CHOI H and CHOI Y disclose the features of the claimed invention as discussed above but does not disclose the organic light-emitting pattern has a size of 10 nm to 1000 µm. CHEN R, however, disclose wherein the organic light-emitting pattern (104) has a dimension of 3mm x 3mm (Fig. 1 and English Text). However, the selection of the claimed process parameters would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date was made to form the organic light-emitting pattern has a size is within the claimed range, since it is well settles that when the general conditions of a claim are discloses in the prior art, discovering the optimum or workable ranges involves only routine skill in the art. In re Aller, 105 USPQ 233. Allowable Subject Matter 8. The following is a statement of reason for the indication of allowable subject matter: None of the prior art of records disclose an organic light-emitting composite, comprising: a curable phosphorescent host; a curable phosphorescent dopant; and an organic silica precursor forming a silicone (-Si-O-Si-) network together with the curable phosphorescent host and the curable phosphorescent dopant, wherein the curable phosphorescent host and the curable phosphorescent dopant comprise a cross-linking functional group, as cited in the independent claim 1. Claims 2-12 are directly or indirectly depend on claim 1, then, they are also being allowed. None of the prior art of records disclose an organic light-emitting device, comprising: a curable phosphorescent host; a curable phosphorescent dopant; and an organic silica precursor forming a silicone (-Si-O-Si-) network together with the curable phosphorescent host and the curable phosphorescent dopant, wherein the curable phosphorescent host and the curable phosphorescent dopant comprise a cross-linking functional group, in combinations with the other steps as cited in the independent claim 18. Claims 19 and 21 are directly depend on claim 18, then, they are also being allowed. Claims 14-16 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Cited Prior Arts 9. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant’s disclosure. SONG T (KR-20180065365-A) discloses an organic light-emitting thin film, the patterning method comprising a patterning method for organic light emitting layer 130 and the second electrode 126 of the first contact portion and the organic light emitting layer 130 and the second electrode 126 of the second contact portion are removed using the etch resist 115 as a mask (Figs. 9a-9d and English Text). Conclusion 10. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Phuc T. Dang whose telephone number is 571-272-1776. The examiner can normally be reached on 8:00 am-5:00 pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Jacob Choi can be reached on 469-295-9060. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PHUC T DANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2897
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 04, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12772894
SENSING CHIP PACKAGING STRUCTURE AND METHOD
3y 0m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12765209
DISPLAY PANEL
3y 3m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12762681
MEASURING METHOD AND MEASURING DEVICE
3y 0m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12764960
THREE-DIMENSIONAL SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE CONTAINING CORE-BIAS ELECTRODE SURROUNDED BY VERTICAL SEMICONDUCTOR CHANNEL AND METHOD OF FORMING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12755861
METHOD FOR REGULATING THERMAL BOUNDARY CONDUCTANCE BETWEEN METAL AND INSULATOR
3y 0m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
96%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+1.4%)
1y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1850 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month