Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/844,141

METHOD FOR OPERATING A COLD GLUE APPLICATION DEVICE, AND DEVICE FOR APPLYING COLD GLUE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Sep 05, 2024
Examiner
WIECZOREK, MICHAEL P
Art Unit
1712
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
4Boxproducer Com Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
55%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
73%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 55% of resolved cases
55%
Career Allow Rate
476 granted / 870 resolved
-10.3% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
909
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
50.0%
+10.0% vs TC avg
§102
13.7%
-26.3% vs TC avg
§112
29.6%
-10.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 870 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The listing of references in the specification is not a proper information disclosure statement. 37 CFR 1.98(b) requires a list of all patents, publications, or other information submitted for consideration by the Office, and MPEP § 609.04(a) states, "the list may not be incorporated into the specification but must be submitted in a separate paper." Therefore, unless the references have been cited by the examiner on form PTO-892, they have not been considered. Page 1 Paragraph 0002 through Page 4 Paragraph 0013 of the specification of the present application as originally filed cites several Foreign Prior Art Patent documents which have not been submitted to the Office and therefore have not been considered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1, 2, 4-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The term “high-frequency oscillation” in claim 1 is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. The term “high-frequency oscillation” is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. Claim 1 is indefinite because it is not clear what frequency the ultrasonic generator has to operate at in order to provide “high-frequency” oscillation. The term “high-frequency oscillation” in claim 2 is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. The term “high-frequency oscillation” is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. Claim 2 is indefinite because it is not clear what frequency the ultrasonic generator has to operate at in order to provide “high-frequency” oscillation. The term “high-frequency oscillation” in claim 4 is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. The term “high-frequency oscillation” is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. Claim 4 is indefinite because it is not clear what frequency the ultrasonic generator has to operate at in order to provide “high-frequency” oscillation. Claim 10 is indefinite because it is not clear if the “a water bath in the moist air generating device” is the same as or different from the “an open water bath” in the moisture generating device as disclosed in parent claim 1. For the purposes they will be considered the same. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 2 and 4-10 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Kronseder (U.S. Patent Publication No. 2018/0186494) teaches a method for operating a cold glue applicator in the form of a glue printer to apply cold glue onto a target material/glue application surface (Abstract and Page 1 Paragraph 008). However, Kronseder does not fairly teach or suggest having feed moist air generated from an ultrasonic evaporator having an open water bath onto the application means of the cold glue applicator. Heide (U.S. Patent Publication No. 2003/0127530) teaches a method for cleaning a glue application/application means in the form of a glue-application nozzle wherein a water jet was feed onto the application nozzle (Abstract, Pages 2-3 Paragraphs 0036-0037 and Figure 1). However, Heide does not fairly teach or suggest having feed moist air generated from an ultrasonic evaporator having an open water bath onto the application means of the cold glue applicator Duss (U.S. Patent # 10,183,307) teaches a method for operating a cold glue applicator comprising an application means in the form of a nozzle valve (Abstract and Column 2 Line 63 through Column 3 Line 4). Duss teaches having generated moist air in a moist generating device in the form of a moist-air generator and then feeding the generated moist air internally into a distributor plate of the application means/nozzle valve (Column 7 Line 35 through Column 8 Line 3). However, Duss does not fairly teach or suggest that the moist air was generated using an ultrasonic evaporation having an open water bath operated with an ultrasonic generator and that the moist air was feed externally against the application means. Conclusion Claims 1, 2 and 4 through 10 have been rejected. No claims were allowed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL P WIECZOREK whose telephone number is (571)270-5341. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 6:00 AM - 3:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Cleveland can be reached at (571)272-1418. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL P WIECZOREK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1712
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 05, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600544
Coated Membranes and Methods of Making the Same
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12589584
A METHOD FOR APPLYING A LAYERED TEXTILE TO A METAL SUBSTRATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12584923
APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR FABRICATION OF NANOPATTERNED ARRAYS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12577998
MATERIAL LIFE EXTENSION FOR REFURBISHED 2-FOR-1 CARBON BRAKES VIA CERAMIC SOLUTIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12570816
HYDROGEN PEROXIDE PLASMA SURFACE MODIFICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
55%
Grant Probability
73%
With Interview (+18.0%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 870 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month