Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/844,203

INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, DETERMINATION METHOD, PROGRAM, AND STORAGE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 05, 2024
Priority
Mar 15, 2022 — JP 2022-040122 +1 more
Examiner
OLSON, LARS A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Pioneer Smart Sensing Innovations Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
1579 granted / 1928 resolved
+21.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1938
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
38.5%
-1.5% vs TC avg
§102
28.6%
-11.4% vs TC avg
§112
24.2%
-15.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1928 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The present application is a 371 of PCT/JP2023/008958 filed on March 9, 2023. A preliminary amendment was filed by the applicant on September 5, 2024. Claim 10 has been cancelled. Drawings The drawings were received on September 5, 2024. These drawings are acceptable. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on September 5, 2024 and February 11, 2026 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements are being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2, 5 and 8-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Gonring et al. (US 7,561,886). Gonring et al. discloses the same information processing device as claimed, as shown in Figures 1-8, which is comprised of an acquisition unit in the form of a microprocessor, defined as Part #26, which is configured to acquire measurement data that is generated by first and second position sensors, defined as Parts #21 and 22, as shown in Figure 3, that are provided on a marine vessel or ship, defined as Part #10, said data including a position in both a horizontal and vertical direction, an extraction unit in the form of said microprocessor, which is configured to extract horizontal position data that represents a nearest neighbor point, defined as Part #16, of a dock or berthing place, defined as Part #12, that is nearest to said marine vessel or ship, as shown in Figures 2 and 4, and a straight line calculation unit in the form of said microprocessor, which is configured to calculate a straight line, defined as Part X, along said dock or berthing place, as shown in Figure 4, that is based on a neighbor point set that represents said nearest neighbor point (16). Said microprocessor is also configured to update said straight line (X) based on said neighbor point set after exclusion of a nearest neighbor point which is far from said straight line (X) by a predetermined distance, as shown in Figures 4 and 7. A quay distance calculation unit in the form of said microprocessor is also configured to calculate a quay distance between said marine vessel or ship and said dock or berthing place based on a length of a perpendicular line to said straight line (X), defined as Part A, as shown in Figure 4. Gonring et al. also discloses the same control method and program that is executed by a computer as claimed, as shown in Figures 1-8, said method being comprised of the steps of acquiring measurement data from first and second position sensors, defined as Parts #21 and 22, with a microprocessor or computer having a stored program, defined as Part #26, said data representing a position in both a horizontal and vertical direction, extracting data with said microprocessor or computer and said stored program representing a nearest neighbor point, defined as Part #16, that is nearest to a marine vessel or ship, defined as Part #10, among data that represents measured points of a dock or berthing place, defined as Part #12, as shown in Figure 4, and calculating a straight line, defined as Part X, with said microprocessor or computer and said stored program along said dock or berthing place based on a neighbor point set that represents said nearest neighbor point (16). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-4 and 6-7 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LARS A OLSON whose telephone number is (571) 272-6685. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday 8:00am - 4:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, MARC JIMENEZ can be reached at 571-272-4530. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. August 24, 2026 /LARS A OLSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3615B
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 05, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12735158
WATERWAY SENSOR
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12736669
SUBMERSIBLE DEVICE FOR UNDERWATER SONAR IMAGERY
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12735153
INTEGRATED PRODUCTION COMPLEX ON A GRAVITY-BASED STRUCTURE (GBS)
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12714165
Backpack for Fall Protection
3y 11m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12714092
BOAT HUNTING BLIND INCLUDING A SPRING-LOADED AUTO-LEVELING LEG WITH DUAL ACTION TOP
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+14.0%)
1y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1928 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month