Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/844,762

GANGWAY CONTROL SYSTEM AND METHOD

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 06, 2024
Priority
Apr 12, 2022 — NO 20220435 +1 more
Examiner
OLSON, LARS A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Kongsberg Maritime AS
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
1568 granted / 1912 resolved
+22.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1934
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
55.1%
+15.1% vs TC avg
§102
18.3%
-21.7% vs TC avg
§112
20.1%
-19.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1912 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The present application is a 371 of PCT/NO2023/050082 filed on April 12, 2023. A preliminary amendment was filed by the applicant on September 6, 2024. Claims 1-7 have been cancelled. Claims 8-14 have been added. Drawings The drawings were received on September 6, 2024. These drawings are acceptable. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on September 6, 2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 8-9 and 11-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Hostmark et al. (US 11,124,274). Hostmark et al. discloses the same control system for a gangway structure on a floating structure as claimed, as shown in Figures 1-16, which is comprised of a Global Positioning System (GPS), defined as Part #490, that provides a measurement of the global positions of a vessel, defined as Part #101, with an articulated gangway or passageway, defined as Part #102 or 440, and a target position of a desired landing point, defined as Part #402, for a distal end, defined as Part #102d, of said gangway or passageway, a wheel unit, defined as Part #310, with a processing unit that is configured to calculate a first relative position between said vessel and said desired landing point from GPS data, and a position sensor in the form of a camera, defined as Part #416, and a forward kinetic unit, defined as Part #450, that is configured to measure a second relative position between said distal end of said gangway or passageway and said desired landing point, where said control system is configured to provide a combined data set based on said first and second relative positions that represents an error signal, as described in lines 1-8 of column 6, and to adjust said first relative position by adding said second relative position, which results in a corrected reference signal. Said control system is then configured to adjust the position of said gangway or passageway using said wheel unit based on said corrected reference signal in order to position said distal end of said gangway or passageway to a desired position relative to said landing point, as shown in Figures 4A-B. Hostmark et al. also discloses the same method for controlling a gangway on a floating structure as claimed, as shown in Figures 1-16, said method being comprised of the steps of providing a first relative position from GPS data between a vessel, defined as Part #101, and a desired landing point, defined as Part #402, measuring a second relative position between said desired landing point and a distal end, defined as Part #102d, of a gangway or passageway, defined as Part #102 or 440, with a camera, defined as Part #416, calculating a combined data set with a processing unit that represents an error signal, as described in lines 1-8 of column 6, based on said first and second relative positions and adjusting said first relative position by adding said second relative position, and controlling said distal end of said gangway or passageway with a wheel unit, defined as Part #310, into a desired position relative to said landing point based on said adjusted first relative position, as shown in Figures 4A-B. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 10 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LARS A OLSON whose telephone number is (571) 272-6685. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday 8:00am - 4:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, MARC JIMENEZ can be reached at 571-272-4530. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. July 2, 2026 /LARS A OLSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3615B
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 06, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12673757
WATER JET PROPULSION BOAT
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12673747
GAS SUPPLY SYSTEM APPLICABLE TO GAS LAYER DRAG REDUCTION SHIP, AND SHIP
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12673748
ADJUSTABLE CAVITATOR STRUCTURE HAVING DOUBLE LAYER RETRACTABLE SHEET
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12654810
Pulling Structures into Water
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12654833
A JOYSTICK DEVICE FOR A VEHICLE
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+14.2%)
1y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1912 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month