Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/845,386

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TRANSMISSION OR RECEPTION OF STF FOR NEW NUMEROLOGY IN WIRELESS LAN SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 09, 2024
Priority
Apr 20, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0049053 +1 more
Examiner
HAMPTON, TARELL A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
LG Electronics Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
653 granted / 758 resolved
+26.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
790
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.1%
-31.9% vs TC avg
§103
54.8%
+14.8% vs TC avg
§102
16.4%
-23.6% vs TC avg
§112
13.2%
-26.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 758 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Claim(s) 1-7 and 9 have been examined and are pending. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 2 is objected to because of the following informalities: There is a typographic error, where it recites “sequency” it should instead recite “sequence”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over PARK (WO 2020111638, corresponds to US 20220021569 A1, US 20220021569 will be referenced for translation) in view of ZHANG (US 20180234227 A1) In regards to claim 1, PARK (US 20220021569 A1) teaches a method performed by a first station (STA) in a wireless local area network (WLAN) system, the method comprising: generating a physical layer protocol data unit (PPDU) including a non-legacy short training field (STF) field and transmitting the generated PPDU to at least one second STA ( PARK teaches generating/transmitting a PPDU to at least one second STA, see “[0154] Hereinafter, a PPDU transmitted/received in an STA of the present specification will be described…”, PARK further teaches where the PPDU includes a non-legacy STF field, HE-STF, “[0174] 1. STF Sequence (or STF Signal) [0175] An HE-STF field mainly aims to improve automatic gain control estimation in MIMO transmission.”), wherein for a transmission on a (PARK also teaches where the bandwidth for transmission of the PPDU includes an 160 MHz bandwidth, “[0197] For 20 MHz/40 MHz/80 MHz/160 MHz/80+80 MHz transmission, a frequency domain sequence for an HE PPDU, not an HE TB PPDU, is given as follows.” ), a first sequence for the non-legacy STF field is based on {−1, −1, −1, 1, 1, 1, −1, 1, 1, 1, −1, 1, 1, −1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, 1, −1, 0, 1, 1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, 1, −1, 1, 1, 1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, 1, 1−1, −1, 1, −1, 0, 1, 1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, −1, −1, −1, 1, 1, 1, −1, 1, 1, 1, −1, 1, 1, −1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, 1, −1, 1, 1, 1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, 1, −1} (PARK further teaches for the 160 MHz bandwidth transmission, a first sequence for the HE-STF field is based on, “[0194] Hereinafter, a sequence applicable to a 1× HE-STF tone (i.e., sampling with an interval of 16 tones) and a sequence applicable to a 2× HE-STF tones (i.e., sampling with an interval of 8 tones) are proposed. Specifically, a sequence structure with excellent scalability is proposed by using a nested structure in which a basic sequence is set and the basic sequence is included as part of a new sequence. An M-sequence used in the following example is preferably a sequence having a length of 15. The M-sequence is preferably configured of a binary sequence to reduce the complexity during decoding.[0195] First, the M-sequence used to configure the HE-STF field is defined as follows. M={−1, −1, −1, 1, 1, 1, −1, 1, 1, 1, −1, 1, 1, −1, 1} ). [0194] Hereinafter, a sequence applicable to a 1× HE-STF tone (i.e., sampling with an interval of 16 tones) and a sequence applicable to a 2× HE-STF tones (i.e., sampling with an interval of 8 tones) are proposed. Specifically, a sequence structure with excellent scalability is proposed by using a nested structure in which a basic sequence is set and the basic sequence is included as part of a new sequence. An M-sequence used in the following example is preferably a sequence having a length of 15. The M-sequence is preferably configured of a binary sequence to reduce the complexity during decoding. [0195] First, the M-sequence used to configure the HE-STF field is defined as follows. M={−1, −1, −1, 1, 1, 1, −1, 1, 1, 1, −1, 1, 1, −1, 1}… [0202] For a 160 MHz transmission, the frequency domain sequence for HE PPDUs that are not HE TB PPDUs is given by Equation (27-26). HES.sub.−1008:16:1008={M, 1, −M, 0, −M, 0, −M, −1, M, 0, −M, 1, −M}.Math.(1+j)/√{square root over (2)}) PARK differs from claim 1, in that PARK is silent on where with respect to the transmission for the first sequence for the non-legacy STF field, that the transmission occur on a 80 MHz bandwidth. Despite these differences similar features have been seen in other prior art involving wireless communication. ZHANG (US 20180234227 A1) teaches a transmission for an 80 MHz bandwidth, a subcarrier spacing of 60 KHz, and 2048 tones for a frequency, the 2048 subcarriers/tones being equivalent to number of tones of the 160 MHz STF sequence of PARK (“[0118] One aspect is that the system bandwidths employed in a network can have a characteristics of scalability among a set of system bandwidths used in the network, where the scalability factor can be a positive integer. For example, the scalability factor can be 2.sup.n with n being an integer; a set of system bandwidths can consist of 20 MHz, 40 MHz, 80 MHz, 160 MHz and 320 MHz, with a scalability factor of 2 from 20 MHz, which is shown in FIG. 6C. While the system channel bandwidths are integer multiple related, for each system channel bandwidth, each usable subcarrier spacing set is configured to be associated with FFT sizes in a way such that the same sampling rate can be maintained over different usable SCS options; for example, for the system bandwidth of 80 MHz, its associated SCS set is configured as 30 KHz, 60 KHz and 120 KHz, with FFT sizes of 4096, 2048, and 1024, respectively, which corresponds to a same sampling rate of 122.88 MHz. These characteristics are shown in table 620 in FIG. 6C.”). Thus, based upon the teachings of ZHANG (US 20180234227 A1), it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify wireless transmission feature of PARK, by adopting use of the STF sequence for 2048 tones taught by PARK to support transmission on 80 MHz bandwidth at a subcarrier spacing (SCS) of 60 KHz, to thus arrive at claim 1, in order to take advantage of benefits yielded use of the 60 KHz subcarrier spacing for wireless transmission. In regards to claim 7, PARK (US 20220021569 A1) teaches a first station (STA) device operating in a wireless local area network (WLAN) system, the device comprising: at least one transceiver; and at least one processor coupled with the at least one transceiver, wherein the at least one processor is configured to (See Fig 1, which illustrates a first station, operating in a WLAN, comprising at least one transceiver 113/123, at least one processor 111/121, coupled to the at least one transceiver, wherein the processor is configured to perform the following, “[0052] For example, the first STA 110 may perform an operation intended by an AP. For example, the processor 111 of the AP may receive a signal through the transceiver 113, process a reception (RX) signal, generate a transmission (TX) signal, and provide control for signal transmission. The memory 112 of the AP may store a signal (e.g., RX signal) received through the transceiver 113, and may store a signal (e.g., TX signal) to be transmitted through the transceiver. [0053] For example, the second STA 120 may perform an operation intended by a non-AP STA. For example, a transceiver 123 of a non-AP performs a signal transmission/reception operation. Specifically, an IEEE 802.11 packet (e.g., IEEE 802.11a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be packet, etc.) may be transmitted/received. [0054] For example, a processor 121 of the non-AP STA may receive a signal through the transceiver 123, process an RX signal, generate a TX signal, and provide control for signal transmission. A memory 122 of the non-AP STA may store a signal (e.g., RX signal) received through the transceiver 123, and may store a signal (e.g., TX signal) to be transmitted through the transceiver.” ): generate a physical layer protocol data unit (PPDU) including a non-legacy short training field (STF) field; and transmit, through the at least one transceiver, the generated PPDU to at least one second STA ( PARK teaches generating/transmitting a PPDU to at least one second STA, see “[0154] Hereinafter, a PPDU transmitted/received in an STA of the present specification will be described…”, PARK further teaches where the PPDU includes a non-legacy STF field, HE-STF, “[0174] 1. STF Sequence (or STF Signal) [0175] An HE-STF field mainly aims to improve automatic gain control estimation in MIMO transmission.”), wherein for a transmission on a 80 MHz bandwidth (PARK also teaches where the bandwidth for transmission of the PPDU includes an 160 MHz bandwidth, “[0197] For 20 MHz/40 MHz/80 MHz/160 MHz/80+80 MHz transmission, a frequency domain sequence for an HE PPDU, not an HE TB PPDU, is given as follows.” ) a first sequence for the non-legacy STF field is based on {−1, −1, −1, 1, 1, 1, −1, 1, 1, 1, −1, 1, 1, −1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, 1, −1, 0, 1, 1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, 1, −1, 1, 1, 1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, 1, 1−1, −1, 1, −1, 0, 1, 1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, −1, −1, −1, 1, 1, 1, −1, 1, 1, 1, −1, 1, 1, −1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, 1, −1, 1, 1, 1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, 1, −1} (PARK further teaches for the 160 MHz bandwidth transmission, a first sequence for the HE-STF field is based on, “[0194] Hereinafter, a sequence applicable to a 1× HE-STF tone (i.e., sampling with an interval of 16 tones) and a sequence applicable to a 2× HE-STF tones (i.e., sampling with an interval of 8 tones) are proposed. Specifically, a sequence structure with excellent scalability is proposed by using a nested structure in which a basic sequence is set and the basic sequence is included as part of a new sequence. An M-sequence used in the following example is preferably a sequence having a length of 15. The M-sequence is preferably configured of a binary sequence to reduce the complexity during decoding.[0195] First, the M-sequence used to configure the HE-STF field is defined as follows. M={−1, −1, −1, 1, 1, 1, −1, 1, 1, 1, −1, 1, 1, −1, 1} ). [0194] Hereinafter, a sequence applicable to a 1× HE-STF tone (i.e., sampling with an interval of 16 tones) and a sequence applicable to a 2× HE-STF tones (i.e., sampling with an interval of 8 tones) are proposed. Specifically, a sequence structure with excellent scalability is proposed by using a nested structure in which a basic sequence is set and the basic sequence is included as part of a new sequence. An M-sequence used in the following example is preferably a sequence having a length of 15. The M-sequence is preferably configured of a binary sequence to reduce the complexity during decoding. [0195] First, the M-sequence used to configure the HE-STF field is defined as follows. M={−1, −1, −1, 1, 1, 1, −1, 1, 1, 1, −1, 1, 1, −1, 1}… [0202] For a 160 MHz transmission, the frequency domain sequence for HE PPDUs that are not HE TB PPDUs is given by Equation (27-26). HES.sub.−1008:16:1008={M, 1, −M, 0, −M, 0, −M, −1, M, 0, −M, 1, −M}.Math.(1+j)/√{square root over (2)}) PARK differs from claim 7, in that PARK is silent on where with respect to the transmission for the first sequence for the non-legacy STF field, that the transmission occur on a 80 MHz bandwidth. Despite these differences similar features have been seen in other prior art involving wireless communication. ZHANG (US 20180234227 A1) teaches a transmission for an 80 MHz bandwidth, a subcarrier spacing of 60 KHz, and 2048 tones for a frequency, the 2048 subcarriers/tones being equivalent to number of tones of the 160 MHz STF sequence of PARK (“[0118] One aspect is that the system bandwidths employed in a network can have a characteristics of scalability among a set of system bandwidths used in the network, where the scalability factor can be a positive integer. For example, the scalability factor can be 2.sup.n with n being an integer; a set of system bandwidths can consist of 20 MHz, 40 MHz, 80 MHz, 160 MHz and 320 MHz, with a scalability factor of 2 from 20 MHz, which is shown in FIG. 6C. While the system channel bandwidths are integer multiple related, for each system channel bandwidth, each usable subcarrier spacing set is configured to be associated with FFT sizes in a way such that the same sampling rate can be maintained over different usable SCS options; for example, for the system bandwidth of 80 MHz, its associated SCS set is configured as 30 KHz, 60 KHz and 120 KHz, with FFT sizes of 4096, 2048, and 1024, respectively, which corresponds to a same sampling rate of 122.88 MHz. These characteristics are shown in table 620 in FIG. 6C.”). Thus, based upon the teachings of ZHANG (US 20180234227 A1), it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify wireless transmission feature of PARK, by adopting use of the STF sequence for 2048 tones taught by PARK to support transmission on 80 MHz bandwidth at a subcarrier spacing (SCS) of 60 KHz, to thus arrive at claim 7, in order to take advantage of benefits yielded use of the 60 KHz subcarrier spacing for wireless transmission. In regards to claim 9, PARK (US 20220021569 A1) teaches asecond station (STA) device operating in a wireless local area network (WLAN) system, the device comprising: at least one transceiver; and at least one processor coupled with the at least one transceiver, wherein the at least one processor is configured to(See Fig 1, which illustrates a first station, operating in a WLAN, comprising at least one transceiver 113/123, at least one processor 111/121, coupled to the at least one transceiver, wherein the processor is configured to perform the following, “[0052] For example, the first STA 110 may perform an operation intended by an AP. For example, the processor 111 of the AP may receive a signal through the transceiver 113, process a reception (RX) signal, generate a transmission (TX) signal, and provide control for signal transmission. The memory 112 of the AP may store a signal (e.g., RX signal) received through the transceiver 113, and may store a signal (e.g., TX signal) to be transmitted through the transceiver. [0053] For example, the second STA 120 may perform an operation intended by a non-AP STA. For example, a transceiver 123 of a non-AP performs a signal transmission/reception operation. Specifically, an IEEE 802.11 packet (e.g., IEEE 802.11a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be packet, etc.) may be transmitted/received. [0054] For example, a processor 121 of the non-AP STA may receive a signal through the transceiver 123, process an RX signal, generate a TX signal, and provide control for signal transmission. A memory 122 of the non-AP STA may store a signal (e.g., RX signal) received through the transceiver 123, and may store a signal (e.g., TX signal) to be transmitted through the transceiver.” ): receive, through the at least one transceiver, a physical layer protocol data unit (PPDU) from a first STA and based on a non-legacy short training field (STF) included in the PPDU, process the PPDU( PARK teaches receiving through the at least one transceiver, a PPDU from at least one first STA, see “[0154] Hereinafter, a PPDU transmitted/received in an STA of the present specification will be described…”, PARK further teaches where the PPDU includes a non-legacy STF field, HE-STF, the HE-STF field being used for processing the PPDU, “[0174] 1. STF Sequence (or STF Signal) [0175] An HE-STF field mainly aims to improve automatic gain control estimation in MIMO transmission.”)wherein for a transmission on a (PARK also teaches where the bandwidth for transmission of the PPDU includes an 160 MHz bandwidth, “[0197] For 20 MHz/40 MHz/80 MHz/160 MHz/80+80 MHz transmission, a frequency domain sequence for an HE PPDU, not an HE TB PPDU, is given as follows.” ) a first sequence for the non-legacy STF field is based on {−1, −1, −1, 1, 1, 1, −1, 1, 1, 1, −1, 1, 1, −1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, 1, −1, 0, 1, 1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, 1, −1, 1, 1, 1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, 1, 1, −1, −1, 1, −1, 0, 1, 1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, −1, −1, −1, 1, 1, 1, −1, 1, 1, 1, −1, 1, 1, −1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, 1, −1, 1, 1, 1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, 1, −1} (PARK further teaches for the 160 MHz bandwidth transmission, a first sequence for the HE-STF field is based on, “[0194] Hereinafter, a sequence applicable to a 1× HE-STF tone (i.e., sampling with an interval of 16 tones) and a sequence applicable to a 2× HE-STF tones (i.e., sampling with an interval of 8 tones) are proposed. Specifically, a sequence structure with excellent scalability is proposed by using a nested structure in which a basic sequence is set and the basic sequence is included as part of a new sequence. An M-sequence used in the following example is preferably a sequence having a length of 15. The M-sequence is preferably configured of a binary sequence to reduce the complexity during decoding.[0195] First, the M-sequence used to configure the HE-STF field is defined as follows. M={−1, −1, −1, 1, 1, 1, −1, 1, 1, 1, −1, 1, 1, −1, 1} ). [0194] Hereinafter, a sequence applicable to a 1× HE-STF tone (i.e., sampling with an interval of 16 tones) and a sequence applicable to a 2× HE-STF tones (i.e., sampling with an interval of 8 tones) are proposed. Specifically, a sequence structure with excellent scalability is proposed by using a nested structure in which a basic sequence is set and the basic sequence is included as part of a new sequence. An M-sequence used in the following example is preferably a sequence having a length of 15. The M-sequence is preferably configured of a binary sequence to reduce the complexity during decoding. [0195] First, the M-sequence used to configure the HE-STF field is defined as follows. M={−1, −1, −1, 1, 1, 1, −1, 1, 1, 1, −1, 1, 1, −1, 1}… [0202] For a 160 MHz transmission, the frequency domain sequence for HE PPDUs that are not HE TB PPDUs is given by Equation (27-26). HES.sub.−1008:16:1008={M, 1, −M, 0, −M, 0, −M, −1, M, 0, −M, 1, −M}.Math.(1+j)/√{square root over (2)}). PARK differs from claim 9, in that PARK is silent on where with respect to the transmission for the first sequence for the non-legacy STF field, that the transmission occur on a 80 MHz bandwidth. Despite these differences similar features have been seen in other prior art involving wireless communication. ZHANG (US 20180234227 A1) teaches a transmission for an 80 MHz bandwidth, a subcarrier spacing of 60 KHz, and 2048 tones for a frequency, the 2048 subcarriers/tones being equivalent to number of tones of the 160 MHz STF sequence of PARK (“[0118] One aspect is that the system bandwidths employed in a network can have a characteristics of scalability among a set of system bandwidths used in the network, where the scalability factor can be a positive integer. For example, the scalability factor can be 2.sup.n with n being an integer; a set of system bandwidths can consist of 20 MHz, 40 MHz, 80 MHz, 160 MHz and 320 MHz, with a scalability factor of 2 from 20 MHz, which is shown in FIG. 6C. While the system channel bandwidths are integer multiple related, for each system channel bandwidth, each usable subcarrier spacing set is configured to be associated with FFT sizes in a way such that the same sampling rate can be maintained over different usable SCS options; for example, for the system bandwidth of 80 MHz, its associated SCS set is configured as 30 KHz, 60 KHz and 120 KHz, with FFT sizes of 4096, 2048, and 1024, respectively, which corresponds to a same sampling rate of 122.88 MHz. These characteristics are shown in table 620 in FIG. 6C.”). Thus, based upon the teachings of ZHANG (US 20180234227 A1), it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify wireless transmission feature of PARK, by adopting use of the STF sequence for 2048 tones taught by PARK to support transmission on 80 MHz bandwidth at a subcarrier spacing (SCS) of 60 KHz, to thus arrive at claim 9, in order to take advantage of benefits yielded use of the 60 KHz subcarrier spacing for wireless transmission. In regards to claim 2, the combination of PARK in view of ZHANG suggests the method of claim 1, wherein: the first sequence is given by S.sub.−1008:16:1008={−1, −1, −1, 1, 1, 1, −1, 1, 1, 1, −1, 1, 1, −1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, 1, −1, 0, 1, 1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, 1, −1, 1, 1, 1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, 1, −1, 0, 1, 1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, −1, −1, −1, 1, 1, 1, −1, 1, 1, 1, −1, 1, 1−1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, 1, −1, 1, 1, 1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, −1, 1, −1, −1, 1, −1}*(1+j)/√2, S.sub.−x:y:z represents coefficients of the non-legacy STF on every y sub-carrier indices from subcarrier indices x to z, and coefficients on other subcarrier indices are set to 0 (See where PARK further teaches for the 160 MHz bandwidth transmission, a first sequence for the HE-STF field is based on, “[0194] Hereinafter, a sequence applicable to a 1× HE-STF tone (i.e., sampling with an interval of 16 tones) and a sequence applicable to a 2× HE-STF tones (i.e., sampling with an interval of 8 tones) are proposed. Specifically, a sequence structure with excellent scalability is proposed by using a nested structure in which a basic sequence is set and the basic sequence is included as part of a new sequence. An M-sequence used in the following example is preferably a sequence having a length of 15. The M-sequence is preferably configured of a binary sequence to reduce the complexity during decoding.[0195] First, the M-sequence used to configure the HE-STF field is defined as follows. M={−1, −1, −1, 1, 1, 1, −1, 1, 1, 1, −1, 1, 1, −1, 1} ). [0194] Hereinafter, a sequence applicable to a 1× HE-STF tone (i.e., sampling with an interval of 16 tones) and a sequence applicable to a 2× HE-STF tones (i.e., sampling with an interval of 8 tones) are proposed. Specifically, a sequence structure with excellent scalability is proposed by using a nested structure in which a basic sequence is set and the basic sequence is included as part of a new sequence. An M-sequence used in the following example is preferably a sequence having a length of 15. The M-sequence is preferably configured of a binary sequence to reduce the complexity during decoding. [0195] First, the M-sequence used to configure the HE-STF field is defined as follows. M={−1, −1, −1, 1, 1, 1, −1, 1, 1, 1, −1, 1, 1, −1, 1}… [0202] For a 160 MHz transmission, the frequency domain sequence for HE PPDUs that are not HE TB PPDUs is given by Equation (27-26). HES.sub.−1008:16:1008={M, 1, −M, 0, −M, 0, −M, −1, M, 0, −M, 1, −M}.Math.(1+j)/√{square root over (2)}). In regards to claim 4, the combination of PARK in view of ZHANG suggests the method of claim 1, wherein: a duration of the non-legacy STF field is determined based on a STF periodicity, the STF periodicity is 1.6 us (See where PARK recites with respect to non-legacy STF “[0184] FIG. 20 shows a 2× HE-STF tone in PPDU transmission for each channel according to the present embodiment. More specifically, an HE-STF tone (i.e., 8-tone sampling) having a periodicity of 1.6 μs in a 20 MHz/40 MHz/80 MHz bandwidth is shown for example in FIG. 20. Therefore, in FIG. 20, HE-STF tones for respective bandwidths (or channels) may be located with an interval of 8 tones.”). . In regards to claim 3, PARK teaches the method of claim 1, wherein: for a transmission on a For an 80 MHz transmission, the frequency domain sequence for HE PPDUs that are not HE TB PPDUs is given by Equation (27-25).”). PARK differs from claim 9, in that PARK is silent on where with respect to the transmission for the second sequence for the non-legacy STF field, that the transmission occur on a 40 MHz bandwidth. Despite these differences similar features have been seen in other prior art involving wireless communication. ZHANG (US 20180234227 A1) teaches a transmission for an 40 MHz bandwidth, a subcarrier spacing of 60 KHz, and 1024 tones for a frequency, the 1024 subcarriers/tones being equivalent to number of tones of the 80 MHz STF sequence of PARK (“[0118] One aspect is that the system bandwidths employed in a network can have a characteristics of scalability among a set of system bandwidths used in the network, where the scalability factor can be a positive integer. For example, the scalability factor can be 2.sup.n with n being an integer; a set of system bandwidths can consist of 20 MHz, 40 MHz, 80 MHz, 160 MHz and 320 MHz, with a scalability factor of 2 from 20 MHz, which is shown in FIG. 6C. While the system channel bandwidths are integer multiple related, for each system channel bandwidth, each usable subcarrier spacing set is configured to be associated with FFT sizes in a way such that the same sampling rate can be maintained over different usable SCS options; for example, for the system bandwidth of 80 MHz, its associated SCS set is configured as 30 KHz, 60 KHz and 120 KHz, with FFT sizes of 4096, 2048, and 1024, respectively, which corresponds to a same sampling rate of 122.88 MHz. These characteristics are shown in table 620 in FIG. 6C.”). Thus, based upon the teachings of ZHANG (US 20180234227 A1), it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify wireless transmission feature of PARK, by adopting use of the STF sequence for 1024 tones taught by PARK to support transmission on 40 MHz bandwidth at a subcarrier spacing (SCS) of 60 KHz, to thus arrive at claim 3, in order to take advantage of benefits yielded use of the 60 KHz subcarrier spacing for wireless transmission. In regards to claim 5, PARK is silent on the method of claim 1, wherein: based on the PPDU being a 20 MHz PPDU, a total number of subcarriers is 512, based on the PPDU being a 40 MHz PPDU, the total number of subcarriers is 1024, based on the PPDU being a 80 MHz PPDU, the total number of subcarriers is 2048, based on the PPDU being a 160 MHz PPDU, the total number of subcarriers is 4096, and based on the PPDU being a 320 MHz PPDU, the total number of subcarriers is 8192. However, PARK does teach a 20 MHz PPDU, a 40 MHz PPDU, a 80 MHz PPDU, a 160 MHz PPDU, and 320 MHz PPDU (See where PARK recites, “2.2. Various RF Capability, that is, a Situation where a Transmittable Maximum Bandwidth of RF is 80/160/240/320 MHz or the Like is Considered [0295] For example, when transmitting a 160 MHz PPDU, two 80 MHz transmittable RFs may be used, or one 160 MHz transmittable RF may be used. Therefore, when optimizing a sequence, it is possible to design a sequence which minimizes a max PAPR by considering a PAPR of two 80 MHz parts and one 160 MHz part. In the following description, a PAPR in a bandwidth other than 80 MHz is a max PAPR among PAPRs of several 80/160/240/320 MHz parts. That is, the present embodiment proposes a sequence in which the max PAPR is minimized among the PAPRs in consideration of all cases in which the maximum transmittable bandwidth of RF is 80/160/240/320 MHz.”) Furthermore ZHANG (US 20180234227 A1) teaches a transmission for a 40 MHz bandwidth, a subcarrier spacing of 60 KHz, a total number of carriers being 1024, for a 80 MHz bandwidth, a SCS of 60 KHz, a total number of subcarriers being 2048, for a 160 MHz bandwidth, a SCS of 60 KHz, a total number of subcarriers 4096, (See [Fig. 6C] and “[0118] One aspect is that the system bandwidths employed in a network can have a characteristics of scalability among a set of system bandwidths used in the network, where the scalability factor can be a positive integer. For example, the scalability factor can be 2.sup.n with n being an integer; a set of system bandwidths can consist of 20 MHz, 40 MHz, 80 MHz, 160 MHz and 320 MHz, with a scalability factor of 2 from 20 MHz, which is shown in FIG. 6C. While the system channel bandwidths are integer multiple related, for each system channel bandwidth, each usable subcarrier spacing set is configured to be associated with FFT sizes in a way such that the same sampling rate can be maintained over different usable SCS options; for example, for the system bandwidth of 80 MHz, its associated SCS set is configured as 30 KHz, 60 KHz and 120 KHz, with FFT sizes of 4096, 2048, and 1024, respectively, which corresponds to a same sampling rate of 122.88 MHz. These characteristics are shown in table 620 in FIG. 6C.”). Thus, based upon the teachings of ZHANG (US 20180234227 A1), it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify wireless transmission feature of PARK, by support transmission on at SCS of 60 KHz, and relying on the total subcarrier arrangements corresponding to the bandwidths of 40 MHz, 80 MHz, 160 MHz, and 320 MHz at the 60 MHz SCS, suggested by ZHANG to thus arrive at claim 5, in order to take advantage of benefits yielded use of the 60 KHz subcarrier spacing for wireless transmission. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 6 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TARELL A HAMPTON whose telephone number is (571)270-7162. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ayaz Sheikh can be reached at 5712723795. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TARELL A HAMPTON/Examiner, Art Unit 2476 ,/AYAZ R SHEIKH/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2476
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 09, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750166
INDICATION SCHEME FOR RATELESS CODES TRANSMISSIONS WITHOUT FEEDBACK INFORMATION
3y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12726266
TECHNIQUE AND APPARATUS FOR MANAGING MOBILITY OF TERMINAL IN SATELLITE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12727010
SIDELINK CHANNEL RESERVATION ACQUISITION AND COLLISION RECOVERY IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12726899
Efficient Usage of Receivers for Paging-Early-Indication Reception
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12720554
SEARCH SPACE SET CONFIGURATION FOR MULTI-SLOT PDCCH MONITORING
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+10.2%)
2y 10m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 758 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month