Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/845,726

INJECTION MOLDING PROCESS

Final Rejection §DOUBLEPATENT
Filed
Sep 10, 2024
Priority
Mar 14, 2022 — EU 22161853.1 +1 more
Examiner
KAUCHER, MARK S
Art Unit
1759
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
SABIC (Saudi Basic Industries Corporation)
OA Round
2 (Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
730 granted / 1008 resolved
+7.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1024
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
42.9%
+2.9% vs TC avg
§102
23.4%
-16.6% vs TC avg
§112
20.3%
-19.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1008 resolved cases

Office Action

§DOUBLEPATENT
DETAILED ACTION The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior office action. All outstanding objections and rejections made in the previous Office Action, and not repeated below, are hereby withdrawn. No new grounds of rejection are set forth below. Thus, the following action is properly made final. Double Patenting Claims 1-15 are provisionally rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 14, 1-5 and 7-13 of copending Application No. 18/845,154 (reference application). Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other. As to claim 1, copending claim 14 is identical and therefore anticipates the instant claim. As to claim 2, copending parent claim 1 discloses the claimed ratio. As to claim 3, see copending claim 2. As to claim 4, see copending parent claim 1 for the melt flow rate and copending claim 3 for the impact strength. As to claim 5, see parent claim 1 discloses the claimed amounts and copending claim 4 for the viscosities. As to claim 6, see parent claim 1 discloses the claimed amounts and copending claim 5 for the viscosities. As to claim 7, see copending claim 6. As to claim 8, see copending claim 7. As to claim 9, see copending claim 9. As to claim 10, see copending claim 10. As to claim 11, see copending claim 11. As to claim 12, see copending claim 13. As to claims 13-14, see copending claim 12. As to claim 15, see copending claims 13 and 7. This is a provisional nonstatutory double patenting rejection because the patentably indistinct claims have not in fact been patented. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments The 112 and 102/103 rejections are withdrawn in light of applicant’s amendments and arguments. Specifically, the 112 rejections are withdrawn in light of the amendments to removed Crystex QC. The rejections over Yasumoto are withdrawn in light of applicant’s arguments that the elastomer is not added to the masterbatch but the composition. Applicant shows, via the examples, that the energy required to process the compositions is reduced by having elastomer in the masterbatch. Applicant's request for abeyance with respect to the ODP rejections is acknowledged to the extent that applicant's lack of response to the cited rejection will not be treated as non-responsive. However, since the rejection is proper it will be maintained until such time as a proper response to it is filed or conditions appropriate for removal of the rejection are present. Note that the instant application was later filed. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MARK S KAUCHER whose telephone number is (571)270-7340. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-6 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Arrie Lanee Reuther can be reached at (571) 270-7026. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MARK S KAUCHER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1764
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 10, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DOUBLEPATENT
Aug 12, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 15, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §DOUBLEPATENT (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747313
PROCESS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF A VINYL CHLORIDE-(METH)ACRYLATE COPOLYMER AND COMPOSITION COMPRISING SUCH A COPOLYMER
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12747304
METHOD FOR PRODUCING C9 HYDROGENATED RESIN BY REUSING THERMALLY POLYMERIZED LIQUID RESIN
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12741936
COMPOUND, POLYMERIZABLE COMPOSITION, POLYMER, AND POLYMERIZED FILM
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12735560
POLYPROPYLENE-BASED RESIN COMPOSITION, HYDROGENATED BLOCK COPOLYMER, MOLDED ARTICLE, AND INTERIOR-EXTERIOR DECORATIVE MATERIAL FOR AUTOMOBILES
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12729293
POLYPROPYLENE - POLYETHYLENE BLENDS WITH IMPROVED PROPERTIES
4y 6m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+14.0%)
2y 9m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1008 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month