Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 27, 2026
Application No. 18/846,618

DISPENSING DEVICE FOR INTERMITTENTLY DISPENSING A COOLING MEDIUM ONTO A CAST STRAND

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 12, 2024
Priority
Mar 14, 2022 — AT A50160/2022 +1 more
Examiner
TRAN, LEN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Primetals Technologies Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
15%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 5m
Est. Remaining
38%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 15% of cases
15%
Career Allowance Rate
18 granted / 121 resolved
-45.1% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
136
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
52.4%
+12.4% vs TC avg
§102
23.3%
-16.7% vs TC avg
§112
21.5%
-18.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 121 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 7-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Bilski et al (US 2020/0180017). As to claims 1, 13, and 14, Bilski et al. disclose a dispensing device comprising: A housing having one inlet opening for admitting cooling medium Control unit to control pressure A switching valve which is disposed in the housing and specified to open and close the dispensing opening Switching valve has a sleeve filled with working fluid and proximal to the dispensing opening is closed in a fluid-tight manner by a closure, Wherein the closure has a switching element moveably mounted outside of the sleeve, and one sealing element, which is disposed on the switching element The switching element is displaceable relative to the sleeve. PNG media_image1.png 645 765 media_image1.png Greyscale Bilski et al. fail to teach the switching element is moveable mounted in the sleeve, instead as shown in the annotated figure, the switching element is along the sleeve. However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to either have the switching element inside or along the sleeve, since it produced the same result of sealing the dispensing opening. Therefore, such modification is merely a design choice. As to claim 7, wherein the sleeve has a bar-type (11) guiding element which runs along the longitudinal axis of the sleeve. As to claim 8, the dispensing opening is a nozzle. As to claim 9, the housing and the sleeve is concentric. As to claim 10 and 11, the working fluid can be gas or liquid. As to claim 12, a spring element (16) to move the switching element from closing to opening. As to claim 15, sliding sealing element is annular seal. Inquiry Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Len Tran whose telephone number is (571)272-1184. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8am - 4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LEN TRAN/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3763
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 12, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12744226
HEAT EXCHANGER ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12661676
CLEANING NOZZLE FOR CRYOGENIC FLUID FUELING RECEPTACLE
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12656041
REMOTE, MULTI-FUNCTIONAL SNOW-MAKING APPARATUS
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12623244
FLAMELESS ENERGIZER FOR TREATMENT AGENT
2y 11m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12584693
MICROCHANNEL HEAT EXCHANGER
2y 2m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
15%
Grant Probability
38%
With Interview (+23.6%)
3y 6m (~1y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 121 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month