Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/846,659

A METHOD FOR MANUFACTURE OF HYBRID METAL ALLOY CASTINGS

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Sep 13, 2024
Priority
Mar 28, 2022 — PL 440772 +1 more
Examiner
TRAN, LEN
Art Unit
3763
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
None recorded (individual inventor: Lothar THONI)
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
16%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
41%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 16% of cases
16%
Career Allowance Rate
19 granted / 122 resolved
-54.4% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+25.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
141
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
51.9%
+11.9% vs TC avg
§102
22.6%
-17.4% vs TC avg
§112
22.4%
-17.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 122 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. As to claim 1, applicant claimed hybrid casting, which is known to have a solid in-cast material inside the mold followed by molten metal to be poured into the mold and solidified with the solid in-cast metal. However, the claim also requires that the molten metal is cast around a core (3) with separating agent on the core. Applicant used “and/or” throughout claim 1. Therefore, the examiner is taking the position that the claimed invention is casting around the core (3) with separating agent on the core for separation. If this is an incorrect interpretation, applicant needs to amend and correct the claimed invention. As to claim 6, it is unclear what is the scope of the claimed invention. It will be assumed that the applicant is claiming a lubricant as the separating agent. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Mohr (US 2014/0190649). As to claim 1, Mohr discloses a method of hybrid casting comprising the steps of: Providing an insert (#48 figure 15) Preheating the mold with the insert (inherent steps for casting) Providing a core (68) Filling molten metal into the cope and drag (figure 15) The core (68) has separating agent (inherent for casting) for separating the solidified cast piece. As to claim 2, the insert (48) is different from the cast-in piece (molten metal). As to claim 3, the separating agent known in the casting art is preferable to be either ceramic in liquid, solid, or foam form. As to claim 4, the separating agent would normally be removed mechanically. As to claim 5, the separating agent would be removed chemically. As to claims 6-9, the separating agent in the casting industry is either lubricant, ceramic material, or suitable materials that are applied by brushing or spraying. Inquiry Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Len Tran whose telephone number is (571)272-1184. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8am - 4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LEN TRAN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3763
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 13, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12752595
THERMAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
2y 8m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12744226
HEAT EXCHANGER ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12661676
CLEANING NOZZLE FOR CRYOGENIC FLUID FUELING RECEPTACLE
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12656041
REMOTE, MULTI-FUNCTIONAL SNOW-MAKING APPARATUS
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12623244
FLAMELESS ENERGIZER FOR TREATMENT AGENT
2y 11m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
16%
Grant Probability
41%
With Interview (+25.2%)
3y 6m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 122 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month