Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/846,699

PROGRAM, VIRTUAL SPACE PROVIDING METHOD, AND VIRTUAL SPACE PROVIDING SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 13, 2024
Priority
Mar 16, 2022 — JP 2022-041413 +1 more
Examiner
HYLINSKI, STEVEN J
Art Unit
3715
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Cover Corp.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
697 granted / 924 resolved
+5.4% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
955
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.9%
-35.1% vs TC avg
§103
70.1%
+30.1% vs TC avg
§102
16.8%
-23.2% vs TC avg
§112
2.9%
-37.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 924 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 2014/0221101 A1 to Eddy et al. Re claim 1, Eddy discloses a non-transitory computer readable medium for causing a computer providing a virtual space Eddy, see the abstract and Fig. 1, is a builder-type game that enables players to place buildings and consolidate buildings in a game space. to function as: an acquiring unit that acquires item information regarding a plurality of items used by an object operated by a user in the virtual space; [0036]-[0037], a game space 100 is divided into a grid of equal sections. A player uses a mouse to control a cursor to select housing units from a game menu. In the illustrative embodiment of Fig. 1, the player has commanded the game program to place six small housing units 102 in game space 100. a formation unit that forms one or more virtual structures based on the plurality of items; [0037] describes “In Fig. 1, all of the small housing units 102-112 have been positioned adjacent to each other. Alternatively, the small housing units 102-112 could have been selected and placed in any suitable manner and positioned in any location in the game space 100.” a selecting unit that selects items of a common variation associated with the plurality of items, based on a user input; and a replacement unit that replaces at least a portion of the plurality of items forming the one or more virtual structures with items of the common variation, when the plurality of items satisfy a predetermined condition. [0035], “a player builds a virtual world comprises of game objects placed into a game space. At any point, the player consolidate any two or more of the same type of object into a single object which maintains all of the same features and benefits of the original, individual game objects but occupies less game space. See additionally [0038]-[0040]. which describes an example of this feature as shown in Fig. 2. Re claims 2-4, [0035] describes that the virtual structures that are eligible to be combined must be “two or more of the same type”. See Figs. 1-2 which show six small virtual houses of a same type and that are arranged adjacent to each other that are eligible to be combined. Re claim 5, because this claim does not provide any structural limitations or describe what step limitations would define how “forming a single virtual structure” is to be evaluated in the context of the claim, the six small virtual homes shown in Fig. 1 are interpreted, collectively, as a single structure (or block). Re claim 6, as described in [0035], the larger, consolidated structure shown in Fig. 2 “maintains all of the same features and benefits of the original” including the number of inhabitants houses. This meets the limitation of being a virtual storage facility (of attributes and virtual people) capable of storing these virtual items. Re claim 7, absent any definition of what comprises “a predetermined effect in a predetermined range”, the consolidation of six houses in the areas shown in to the single large house in the area shown meets the limitation of being a predetermined graphic effect in the depicted range. Re claim 8, regarding the claim to a predetermined range that a user stays in, [0037], [0039] describes that the UI of the invention of Eddy functions responsive to user mouse cursor selection and moving of objects. Cursor proximity to selectable UI elements meets a limitation of the user staying near certain objects. Re claims 9, 12, [0037] and [0040] describe that any of the small housing units and the replacement unit can be freely placed in the game space based on user input commands. Re claim 10, this negative limitation states that an object different from an object operated by a user does not appear when a predetermined effect occurs. Considering Figs. 1-2 and [0039]-[0040] which describes a user being allowed to freely place large housing unit 122 after it appears (a visual effect of consolidating objects 102-112), there is no visual evidence of any other objects aside from unit 122 being operated by the user appearing in the game space. Re claim 11, [0032] describes that a user may continue to add game objects to a consolidated object, which teaches virtual devices being displayed in different forms. And as shown in Fig. 1, the space occupied by small buildings is a single cell vs multiple cells for the large building, which teaches different ranges (of covered game spaces) associated with the virtual devices. Re claims 13, 14, refer to the rejection of claim 1, wherein the rejection of the computer-readable medium necessarily involves a discussion of a method of its use and a system executing the step limitations encoded in the medium. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEVEN J HYLINSKI whose telephone number is (571)270-1995. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 10-530. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dmitry Suhol can be reached at (571) 272-4430. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /STEVEN J HYLINSKI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 13, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12673263
Method and Apparatus for Controlling Human-Computer Interaction Interface, Device, and Medium
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12667783
STORAGE MEDIUM STORING INFORMATION PROCESSING PROGRAM, INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12661552
BALL POSITION IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM, BALL POSITION IDENTIFICATION METHOD AND INFORMATION STORAGE MEDIUM
4y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12661594
Holder for Attaching a Virtual Reality Device Controller to an Implement
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12661582
INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS AND IMAGE GENERATION METHOD
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+17.5%)
2y 9m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 924 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month