Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/847,006

KEY DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS HAVING SAME

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Sep 13, 2024
Priority
Jun 08, 2022 — CN 202210646492.6 +1 more
Examiner
CAROC, LHEIREN MAE ANGLO
Art Unit
2848
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Beijing Zitiao Network Technology Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
789 granted / 1015 resolved
+9.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
1041
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
43.9%
+3.9% vs TC avg
§102
40.8%
+0.8% vs TC avg
§112
11.6%
-28.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1015 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the capacitive sensor recited in claim 1 must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Specification Applicant is reminded of the proper language and format for an abstract of the disclosure. The abstract should be in narrative form and generally limited to a single paragraph on a separate sheet within the range of 50 to 150 words in length. The abstract should describe the disclosure sufficiently to assist readers in deciding whether there is a need for consulting the full patent text for details. The language should be clear and concise and should not repeat information given in the title. It should avoid using phrases which can be implied, such as, “The disclosure concerns,” “The disclosure defined by this invention,” “The disclosure describes,” etc. In addition, the form and legal phraseology often used in patent claims, such as “comprises,” “means” and “said,” should be avoided. Claim Objections Claims 16 and 17 are objected to because “and being a button unit” in “the button unit being arranged on the device body and being a button unit” on line 2 of claim 16 is redundant and should be removed. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 11 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 11 recites the limitation "the other axial end" in line 2. Claim 15 recites the limitation "the post portion" in line 7. There is insufficient antecedent basis for these limitations in the claims. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-10, 12-14, and 18-20 are allowed. Claims 16 and 17 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the objection set forth in this Office action. In regard to claims 1 and 16, in combination with other limitations, a conductive bracket fixed on the circuit board and in electrical conduction with the capacitive sensor, a button assembly movable relative to the conductive bracket and comprising a conductive member and an insulating member, the conductive member comprising a first conductive portion, and the insulating member comprising a touch surface portion covering an outer side of the first conductive portion, and a conductive spring sandwiched between the conductive bracket and the button assembly and in electrical conduction with each of the conductive bracket and the conductive member is neither disclosed nor suggested by the prior art. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Goto et al. [US 4,472,758], Heimann et al. [US 2007/0103451] and Jeong [US 7,741,858] disclose similar button units. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LHEIREN MAE A CAROC whose telephone number is (571)272-2730. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 9:00am-5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Renee Luebke can be reached at 571-272-2009. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LHEIREN MAE A CAROC/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2831
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 13, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749635
DIGITAL DISPLAY POWER SWITCH
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12738431
Multilayer Switchdome Systems and Methods
4y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738255
Three-way selector switch
3y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12731741
Push-Type Solid-State Circuit Breaker
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12724445
ROCKER DEVICE
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+14.1%)
2y 5m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1015 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month