Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/847,048

Electric Motor

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Sep 13, 2024
Priority
Mar 18, 2022 — EU 22162925.6 +1 more
Examiner
MANN JR, CHARLIE FRANK
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Innomotics GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
63 granted / 87 resolved
+4.4% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+28.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
103
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
54.4%
+14.4% vs TC avg
§102
23.2%
-16.8% vs TC avg
§112
18.3%
-21.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 87 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This Office Action is responsive to the Applicant' s communication filed September 13, 2024. In view of this communication, claims 1-7, and 9-14 are now pending in the application. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on September 13, 2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claims 2, 6, and 9-13 are is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 2 recites the limitation "the heat pipe" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 6 recites the limitation "the heat pipe" in line 3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 9 recites the limitation "the heat pipe" in line 3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 10 is rejected due to dependence on claim 9. Claim 10 recites the limitation "the heat pipe" in line 4. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 11 recites the limitation "the heat pipe" in line 8. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 12 recites the limitation "the heat pipe" in line 8. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 13 recites the limitation "the cooling fins" in line 4. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-4, 6, and 9-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gao et al. (CN 108110959 A, hereafter referred to as Gao) in view of Bodla et al. (US 20190350111 A1, hereafter referred to as Bodla). Regarding Claim 1, Gao discloses (see Figures 1-2) an electric motor (1, Page 4, ¶ 2) comprising: a stator (8, Page 4, ¶ 3]) having a plurality of field conductors (9, Page 4, ¶ 3); a plurality of inverters (19, Page 4, ¶ 6) to control the field conductors arranged on one or more circuit boards (11, Page 4, ¶ 4); wherein the one or more circuit boards (11, Page 4, ¶ 4) are arranged on a cooling plate (4, Page 4, ¶ 5); and a heat tube (26-28, Page 5, ¶ 2). PNG media_image1.png 588 434 media_image1.png Greyscale Gao does not disclose the heat tube with an evaporator side arranged in the cooling plate and a condenser side arranged outside the cooling plate. However, Bodla, in the same field of technology, does disclose (see Figures 1 and 3) the heat tube (204, ¶ [0060]) with an evaporator side (210, ¶ [0060]) arranged in the cooling plate (114, ¶ [0060]) and a condenser side (208, ¶ [0060]) arranged outside the cooling plate (¶ [0057]: “For example, opposing walls 106, 108 in the interior portions 210 of the heat pipe assemblies 204 can be in direct contact with neighboring coils 200.”) (¶ [0045]: “By applying the heat pipe assemblies directly to the source of heat in these devices, a significant thermal performance advantage may be realized relative to some known heat pipe assemblies.”). PNG media_image2.png 336 412 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 450 408 media_image3.png Greyscale PNG media_image4.png 274 438 media_image4.png Greyscale It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to modify the electric motor disclosed by Gao such that the heat tube has an evaporator side arranged in the cooling plate and a condenser side arranged outside the cooling plate, as disclosed by Bodla, in order to improve thermal performance (¶ [0045]: “By applying the heat pipe assemblies directly to the source of heat in these devices, a significant thermal performance advantage may be realized relative to some known heat pipe assemblies.”). Regarding Claim 2/1, Gao in view of Bodla has been discussed above Additionally, Bodla discloses (see Figures 2-3 above) that the heat pipe (204, ¶ [0060]) comprises a straight line arranged with an inclination of at least 10° to horizontal (see Figure 2, the heat pipes surround the heat producing member). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to modify the electric motor disclosed by Gao in view of Bodla such that the heat pipe comprises a straight line arranged with an inclination of at least 10° to horizontal, as further disclosed by Bodla, in order to improve thermal performance (¶ [0045]: “By applying the heat pipe assemblies directly to the source of heat in these devices, a significant thermal performance advantage may be realized relative to some known heat pipe assemblies.”). Regarding Claim 3/1, Gao in view of Bodla has been discussed above. Additionally, Gao discloses (see Figure 2) that the one or more circuit boards (11, Page 4, ¶ 4) form a circle or an annular sector. Regarding Claim 4/1, Gao in view of Bodla has been discussed above. Additionally, Gao discloses (see Figure 1 above) that the cooling plate (4, Page 4, ¶ 5) is arranged perpendicular to an axis of the electric motor (1, Page 4, ¶ 2). Regarding Claim 6/1, Gao in view of Bodla has been discussed above. Additionally, Bodla discloses (see Figure 3 above) additional heat pipes (204, ¶ [0060]). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to modify the electric motor disclosed by Gao in view of Bodla such that the electric motor comprises additional heat pipes, as further disclosed by Bodla, in order to improve thermal performance (¶ [0045]: “By applying the heat pipe assemblies directly to the source of heat in these devices, a significant thermal performance advantage may be realized relative to some known heat pipe assemblies.”). Regarding Claim 9/1, Gao in view of Bodla has been discussed above. Additionally, Bodla discloses (see Figure 3 above) that the heat pipe (204, ¶ [0060]) is connected on the condenser side (208, ¶ [0060]) to a plurality of cooling fins (212, ¶ [0059]). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to modify the electric motor disclosed by Gao in view of Bodla such that the heat pipe is connected on the condenser side to a plurality of cooling fins, as further disclosed by Bodla, in order to improve thermal performance (¶ [0045]: “By applying the heat pipe assemblies directly to the source of heat in these devices, a significant thermal performance advantage may be realized relative to some known heat pipe assemblies.”). Regarding Claim 10/9/1, Gao in view of Bodla has been discussed above. Additionally, Bodla discloses (see Figure 3 above) that least some of the plurality of cooling fins are mechanically connected to multiple heat pipes (¶ [0059]: “These fins 212 may be hollow, elongated extensions that outwardly project from the interior chambers 104 of the exterior portions 208 of the heat pipe assemblies 204.”) (¶ [0060]: “In an alternative embodiment, the fins 212 can be separate entities and are attached to the heat pipe using epoxy, solder or a similar bonding operation ensuring thermal communication between the heat pipe body and fins.”). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to modify the electric motor disclosed by Gao in view of Bodla such that at least some of the plurality of cooling fins are mechanically connected to multiple heat pipes, as further disclosed by Bodla, in order to improve thermal performance (¶ [0045]: “By applying the heat pipe assemblies directly to the source of heat in these devices, a significant thermal performance advantage may be realized relative to some known heat pipe assemblies.”). Claim 5, and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gao in view of Bodla as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Li et al. (CN 111769688 A, hereafter referred to as Li). Regarding Claim 5/1, Gao in view of Bodla has been discussed above. Gao in view of Bodla does not disclose that the cooling plate is populated with circuit boards of the one or more circuit boards on both sides. However, Li, in the same field of technology, does disclose (see Figures 5-6) that the cooling plate (5-3, Page 5, ¶ 4) is populated with circuit boards (5-1, 5-4, Page 5, ¶ 4) of the one or more circuit boards on both sides. PNG media_image5.png 230 400 media_image5.png Greyscale PNG media_image6.png 176 358 media_image6.png Greyscale It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to modify the electric motor disclosed by Gao in view of Bodla such that the cooling plate is populated with circuit boards of the one or more circuit boards on both sides, as disclosed by Li, in order to improve thermal regulation (Page 5, ¶ 4: “Because the controller plate 5-1 and the inverter plate 5-4 heat productivity is large, the cooling plate 5-3 is set in the controller plate 5-1 and the inverter plate 5-4 and the surface contact, can better to heat the two.”). Regarding Claim 11/1, Gao in view of Bodla has been discussed above. Gao in view of Bodla does not explicitly disclose that the cooling plate includes two cover surfaces and a surrounding jacket surface; the circuit boards are arranged on at least one of the cover surfaces; and the heat pipe passes through the surrounding jacket surface. However, Li, in the same field of technology, does disclose (see Figures 5-6) that the cooling plate (5-3, Page 5, ¶ 4) includes two cover surfaces and a surrounding jacket surface; the circuit boards (5-1, 5-4, Page 5, ¶ 4) are arranged on at least one of the cover surfaces; and the heat pipe (10-2, Page 5, ¶ 5) passes through the surrounding jacket surface (see Figure 5 above, the cooling plate is bordered by a circuit board on either side, and a heat pipe protrudes from the surrounding internal surface). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to modify the electric motor disclosed by [] such that the cooling plate includes two cover surfaces and a surrounding jacket surface; the circuit boards are arranged on at least one of the cover surfaces; and the heat pipe passes through the surrounding jacket surface, as disclosed by Li, in order to improve thermal regulation (Page 5, ¶ 4: “Because the controller plate 5-1 and the inverter plate 5-4 heat productivity is large, the cooling plate 5-3 is set in the controller plate 5-1 and the inverter plate 5-4 and the surface contact, can better to heat the two.”). Claims 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gao in view of Bodla as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Aizawa et al. (US 20160276895 A1, hereafter referred to as Aizawa). Regarding Claim 7/1, Gao in view of Bodla has been discussed above. Gao in view of Bodla does not explicitly disclose that the electric motor is operable to control the plurality of field conductors with at least 6 phases. However, Aizawa, in the same field of technology, does disclose that the electric motor is operable to control the plurality of field conductors with at least 6 phases (¶ [0102]: “In the present Embodiment 1, a motor unit 300 that has two three-phase connections is presumed, the six modular units 50 are disposed in an annular shape as shown in FIG. 7,”). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to modify the electric motor disclosed by Gao in view of Bodla such that the electric motor is operable to control the plurality of field conductors with at least 6 phases, as disclosed by Aizawa, in order to carry out the various demands of the circuit board (¶ [0101]: “Electric power is supplied to the power modules 14 of the inverter unit 400 from a direct-current power supply or a battery (not shown), and the inverter controlling circuit board 17 controls the output from the power modules 14 in accordance with commands from a microcomputer or a personal computer (not shown).”) Claim 12 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gao in view of Bodla as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Stelzer et al. (DE 102019215519 A1, hereafter referred to as Stelzer). Regarding Claim 12/1, Gao in view of Bodla has been discussed above. wherein: the cooling plate has two cover surfaces and a surrounding jacket surface; the circuit boards are arranged on one of the two cover surfaces; and the heat pipe passes through the other cover surface. Gao in view of Bodla does not explicitly disclose that the cooling plate has two cover surfaces and a surrounding jacket surface; the circuit boards are arranged on one of the two cover surfaces; and the heat pipe passes through the other cover surface. However, Stelzer, in the same field of technology, does disclose (see Figure 2) that the cooling plate (KK1, Page 8, ¶ 1) has two cover surfaces and a surrounding jacket surface (see Figure 2 below, the cooling plate has two faces in opposite directions along the axis of rotation, and an outer edge); the circuit boards (ST, Page 8, ¶ 1) are arranged on one of the two cover surfaces; and the heat pipe (KS1, Page 9, ¶ 1) passes through the other cover surface. PNG media_image7.png 474 438 media_image7.png Greyscale It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to modify the electric motor disclosed by Gao in view of Bodla such that that the cooling plate has two cover surfaces and a surrounding jacket surface; the circuit boards are arranged on one of the two cover surfaces; and the heat pipe passes through the other cover surface, as disclosed by Stelzer, in order to selectively cool specific areas of the motor (Page 2, ¶ 12: “The isolation zone is located between the power electronics zone and the control electronics zone. In this case, the insulating zone has a higher thermal resistance than the power electronics zone and the control electronics zone and thus thermally separates or isolates the power electronics zone and the control electronics zone from one another.”). Claim 13 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gao in view of Bodla as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Brinkman et al. (US 3715610 A, hereafter referred to as Brinkman). Regarding Claim 13/1, Gao in view of Bodla has been discussed above. Additionally, Bodla discloses an air flow over the cooling fins (¶ [0060]: “As depicted, the heat pipe assembly 204 interfaces with the fins 212 consistent with an air-cooled arrangement.”) It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to modify the electric motor disclosed by Gao in view of Bodla such that air flows over the cooling fins, as further disclosed by Bodla, in order to improve thermal performance (¶ [0045]: “By applying the heat pipe assemblies directly to the source of heat in these devices, a significant thermal performance advantage may be realized relative to some known heat pipe assemblies.”). Gao in view of Bodla does not explicitly disclose one or more fans to generate an air flow over the cooling fins. However, Brinkman, in the same field of technology, does disclose (see Figure 1) one or more fans (C3L38) to generate an air flow over the cooling fins (62, C3L46). PNG media_image8.png 346 478 media_image8.png Greyscale It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to modify the electric motor disclosed by Gao in view of Bodla such that one or more fans generate an air flow over the cooling fins, as disclosed by Brinkman, in order to assist in cooling the motor during operation (C3L42-50: “The air expelled from end cavities then can be directed along the axially outer surface of the finned stator frame to enhance the transfer of heat from the stator frame to the adjacent air. If desired, a stationary heat pipe 62 of conventional design can extend axially through the stator and protrude from one (or both) axial ends of the stator into the air flow stream to additionally cool the stator.”) Claim 14 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gao in view of Bodla as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Guru et al. (US 20200358340 A1, hereafter referred to as Guru). Regarding Claim 14/1, Gao in view of Bodla has been discussed above. Gao in view of Bodla does not explicitly disclose that the inverters generate an alternating voltage with an amplitude of 200 V or less However, Guru, in the same field of technology, teaches that the amplitude of an alternating voltage generated by an inverter is a result effective variable (¶ [0003]: “As is known to those skilled in the art, motor controllers, also referred to herein as motor drives, are utilized to vary the amplitude and frequency of the voltage applied to a motor to achieve desired operation of the motor.” “A current regulator and modulation techniques are used to control an inverter section which, in turn, supplies the required current and voltage to the motor from the DC bus to achieve desired operation of the motor.”) It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to modify the electric motor disclosed by Gao in view of Bodla such that the inverters generate an alternating voltage with an amplitude of 200 V or less, as taught by Guru, in order to achieve the desired operation of the motor (¶ [0003]: “As is known to those skilled in the art, motor controllers, also referred to herein as motor drives, are utilized to vary the amplitude and frequency of the voltage applied to a motor to achieve desired operation of the motor.” “A current regulator and modulation techniques are used to control an inverter section which, in turn, supplies the required current and voltage to the motor from the DC bus to achieve desired operation of the motor.”). Citation of Pertinent Prior Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Kang et al. (KR 20160057017 A) discloses relevant prior art in Figures 1-15. Di et al. (CN 112311118 A) discloses relevant prior art in Figure 1. Li et al. (CN 109687609 A) discloses relevant prior art in Figures 1-3. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHARLIE FRANK MANN whose telephone number is (703)756-1275. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 7:30AM - 4:30PM PST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Oluseye Iwarere can be reached at (571) 270-5112. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /C.F.M./Examiner, Art Unit 2834 /OLUSEYE IWARERE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 13, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12744417
STATOR BODY FOR AN ELECTRIC MOTOR, STATOR, ELECTRIC MOTOR, AND ASSOCIATED MANUFACTURING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12719323
THREE-PHASE DRIVEN STATOR STRUCTURE AND FAN USING SAME
2y 3m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12719342
MOTOR
2y 3m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12719326
STATOR FOR AN ELECTRICAL MACHINE AND ELECTRICAL MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12706497
ELECTRICAL ROTATING DEVICE
2y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+28.6%)
2y 4m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 87 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month