Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/847,814

PRODUCT SEARCH DEVICE, PRODUCT SEARCH METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Sep 17, 2024
Priority
Mar 28, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2022014860
Examiner
IWARERE, OLUSEYE
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
NEC Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 7m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
387 granted / 574 resolved
-0.6% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+24.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
4 currently pending
Career history
577
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
14.5%
-25.5% vs TC avg
§103
60.1%
+20.1% vs TC avg
§102
23.8%
-16.2% vs TC avg
§112
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 574 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This communication is in response to the remarks and amendments dated 4/06/2026. Claims 1-3, 5, 6, 8 and 9, as amended on 4/06/2025, are currently pending and have been fully considered below. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see Remarks, filed 4/06/2026, with respect to 35 U.S.C. 101 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The rejections of claims 1-9 have been withdrawn. Applicant’s arguments, see Remarks, filed 4/06/2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1-9 under 35 USC 102 and 103 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of Zalewski (U.S. Patent Publication No. 2020/0160670). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-3, 5, 6, 8 and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ahn (U.S. Patent Publication No. 2023/0244309) in view of Zalewski (U.S. Patent Publication No. 2020/0160670). As per claims 1, 8 and 9. (Currently Amended) Ahn discloses a product search device comprising: a memory configured to store instructions (see fig. 1); and a processor (see fig. 1) configured to execute the instructions to: acquire an image of products and user gaze information captured by a terminal device of a user for a product shelf on which the products are displayed ([0036] A device for providing customized content based on gaze recognition according to an embodiment of the present disclosure may recognize a user’s gaze by automatically adjusting the angle of a camera attached to the device in real time based on a captured image of the user and provide customized content based on gaze recognition, which is content including product information on an item that the user is gazing at. [0188] Specifically, the content providing device 100 in the embodiment may output product information on the detected item based on the product information database 111 to the content display 171-1 as content.); extract, from the image of products, an area including a target product based on the user gaze information, and generate a target image of the target product based on the extracted area ([0011] Furthermore, the present disclosure provides a device and method for providing customized content based on gaze recognition which output content for a product that a user is gazing at.) perform recognition processing on the target image to recognize the target product in the target image (see fig. 3 and [0179] Here, the detected item may include product information corresponding to an advertisement and additional information with respect to the item. To this end, the content providing device 100 in the embodiment may individually match product information included in each item sold to the user 1 using the content providing device 100 with each item and store the same in the product information database 111 in advance.); and acquire product information of the target product including ingredients included in the target product and user information including ingredients affecting health of the user or health of the user’s pet (see fig. 3 and [0187] Then, the content providing device 100 in the embodiment may output content with respect to the detected item (S113).). However, Ahn does not appear to explicitly disclose the highlight, in the product information, harmful ingredients included in the target product that are harmful for the health of the user or the health of the user’s pet based on the user information; and output, to the terminal device, the product information highlighting the harmful ingredients included in the target product that are harmful for the health of the user or the health of the user’s pet to cause the terminal device to display the product information to the user with the harmful ingredient highlighted to notify the user of a presence of the harmful ingredients Zalewski teaches methods and systems for identifying accounts of a shopper to account for taken items in cashier-less transaction with the features of: highlight, in the product information, harmful ingredients included in the target product that are harmful for the health of the user or the health of the user’s pet based on the user information ([0201] For example, guidance may be provided to a customer known or detected to adhere to a specific diet, known to choose products of a specific nutrition level or who may avoid nuts, may be provided information responsive to the user's specific diet profile. Discounts, incentives, or other messages may appear on the display for a specific individual shopper detected to be viewing the display. [0221] The smartphone may have sliders that allow adjustment of parameters such as nutritional information or price information and as the parameters change, it causes only those items that meet the parameters to be highlighted on the display. Highlighting may include casting glow or calling attention to the item but it may also include filtering out all other items in the screen, so only the items that meet the parameters are shown.); and output, to the terminal device, the product information highlighting the harmful ingredients included in the target product that are harmful for the health of the user or the health of the user’s pet to cause the terminal device to display the product information to the user with the harmful ingredient highlighted to notify the user of a presence of the harmful ingredients ([0201] For example, guidance may be provided to a customer known or detected to adhere to a specific diet, known to choose products of a specific nutrition level or who may avoid nuts, may be provided information responsive to the user's specific diet profile. Discounts, incentives, or other messages may appear on the display for a specific individual shopper detected to be viewing the display. [0221] The smartphone may have sliders that allow adjustment of parameters such as nutritional information or price information and as the parameters change, it causes only those items that meet the parameters to be highlighted on the display. Highlighting may include casting glow or calling attention to the item but it may also include filtering out all other items in the screen, so only the items that meet the parameters are shown.). From this teaching of Zalewski, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the system and method of Ahn to include the highlighting, taught by Zalewski, in order to meet users specific preferences. As per claim 2, (Currently Amended) Zalewski discloses he product search device according to claim 1, wherein the processor highlights, in the product information, useful ingredients included in the target product that are useful for the health of the user or the health of the user's pet based on the user information, and outputs, to the terminal device, the product information highlighting the useful ingredients included in the target product that are useful for the health of the user or the health of the user's pet to cause the terminal device to display the product information to the user with the useful ingredients highlighted ([0201] For example, guidance may be provided to a customer known or detected to adhere to a specific diet, known to choose products of a specific nutrition level or who may avoid nuts, may be provided information responsive to the user's specific diet profile. Discounts, incentives, or other messages may appear on the display for a specific individual shopper detected to be viewing the display. [0221] The smartphone may have sliders that allow adjustment of parameters such as nutritional information or price information and as the parameters change, it causes only those items that meet the parameters to be highlighted on the display. Highlighting may include casting glow or calling attention to the item but it may also include filtering out all other items in the screen, so only the items that meet the parameters are shown.). The combination is made by the same rationale as above. As per claim 3, (Currently Amended) Zalewski discloses the product search device according to claim 2, wherein the processor outputs information of a recommended product which includes the useful ingredients and is different from the target product ([0059] The server is configured to collect the product information that is of interest to the user and using said information to provide recommendations to the user regarding other items that may be of interest and/or to provide discount or promotional information for the item or other items.). The combination is made by the same rationale as above. As per claim 5, (Currently Amended) Wilkinson discloses the product search device according to claim 1, wherein the processor outputs information of a recommended product which is an alternative to the target product and does not include the harmful ingredients for health ([0004] Increasing efforts are being made to present a given consumer with one or more purchasing options that are selected based upon some preference of the consumer. When done properly, this approach can help to avoid presenting the consumer with things that they might not wish to consider. [0048] These teachings will accommodate a variety of differing bases for such partialities including, for example, a person's values, affinities, aspirations, and preferences. The “preferences” are construed as including health information). The combination is made by the same rationale as above. As per claim 6, (Currently Amended) Ahn discloses the product search device according to claim 3, wherein the image of products is an image of the products in a store, wherein the processor selects the recommended product from the products in the store (see fig. 2). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See Notice of References Cited form attached. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SEYE IWARERE whose telephone number is (571)270-5112. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:00 - 16:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Andrea Wellington can be reached at (571) 272-4483. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /OLUSEYE IWARERE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 17, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Mar 25, 2026
Interview Requested
Mar 26, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 06, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 24, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12681091
BATTERY MANAGEMENT APPARATUS AND METHOD
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12658775
PERMANENT MAGNET ROTOR MAGNETIC COUPLING BASED ON DOUBLE-SIDED STEPPED STRUCTURE AND THREE-DIMENSIONAL HALBACH MAGNETIC POLE ARRANGEMENT
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12658770
MOTOR CONTROLLER, DRIVE SYSTEM, POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM, AND ELECTRIC DEVICE
10m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12632892
AUTOMATED CHECK REORDERING SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 3m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12614963
NON-AXISYMMETRIC MOTOR WITH INTEGRATED MAGNETIC GEARING
2y 10m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+24.1%)
3y 5m (~1y 7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 574 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month