Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/848,007

SPEED-DEPENDANT BLENDING BETWEEN BLOCKS WITH DISCONTINUOUS TRAJECTORIES

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Sep 17, 2024
Priority
Mar 18, 2022 — EU 22162987.6 +1 more
Examiner
EVERETT, CHRISTOPHER E
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Siemens Aktiengesellschaft
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
722 granted / 864 resolved
+23.6% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
882
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.0%
-32.0% vs TC avg
§103
58.7%
+18.7% vs TC avg
§102
22.2%
-17.8% vs TC avg
§112
7.3%
-32.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 864 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 14-29 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 14, the metes and bounds of the traversing movement are not clear. The first limitation states that the traversing movement is predefined using program instructions and then the last limitation determines the traversing movement. Is the last limitation updating or overwriting the predefined traversing limitation in the first limitation? What is the relationship between the predefined traversing movement and the determined traversing movement? Claims 15-29 depend, directly or indirectly, from independent claim 14 and are rejected based on their dependency thereto. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. B. Sencer and E. Shamoto, "Curvature-continuous sharp corner smoothing scheme for Cartesian motion systems," 2014 IEEE 13th International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control (AMC), Yokohama, Japan, 2014, pp. 374-379 describes a sharp corner smoothing scheme. U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2024/0231309 describes determining an allowable speed at a corner part for a numerical controller. U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0363788 describes a numerical controller that uses continuous desired speed to determine a movement profile. U.S. Patent No. 9,886,020 describes a numerical control device for acquiring acceleration/deceleration information. U.S. Patent No. 9,678,500 describes a numerical control device that sets acceleration and deceleration parameters. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER E EVERETT whose telephone number is (571)272-2851. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00 am to 5:00 pm (Pacific). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert Fennema can be reached at 571-272-2748. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Christopher E. Everett/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2117
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 17, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12748443
VALVE ASSEMBLY AND SYSTEM USED TO CONTROL FLOW RATE OF A FLUID
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12746720
PRINTING SYSTEM AND METHOD OF PRODUCING REPLICA
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12748450
Method and Apparatus for Actively Managing Electric Power Supply for an Electric Power Grid
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12743076
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MANAGING HYDROCARBON ASSETS IN OPERATING FACILITIES
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12738737
ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR MONITORING ABNORMAL STATE OF ENERGY CONSUMPTION AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE SAME
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+23.2%)
2y 7m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 864 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month