Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/848,137

CONTROL CIRCUIT, SYSTEM, METHOD, AND PROGRAM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 18, 2024
Priority
Mar 31, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2022016481
Examiner
SKAIST, AVI T.
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Sony Group Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allowance Rate
251 granted / 391 resolved
+4.2% vs TC avg
Strong +42% interview lift
Without
With
+42.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
408
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
59.3%
+19.3% vs TC avg
§102
7.3%
-32.7% vs TC avg
§112
27.7%
-12.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 391 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The listing of references in the specification is not a proper information disclosure statement. 37 CFR 1.98(b) requires a list of all patents, publications, or other information submitted for consideration by the Office, and MPEP § 609.04(a) states, "the list may not be incorporated into the specification but must be submitted in a separate paper." Therefore, unless the references have been cited by the examiner on form PTO-892 or marked as reviewed on an Information Disclosure Statement, they have not been considered. Title of Invention The title of the invention is too high-level and generic and is therefore not sufficiently descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. The Examiner suggests the following: DETERMINING A MEASUREMENT TARGET REGION WITH A DIRECT TIME OF FLIGHT SENSOR BASED UPON DETECTED EVENTS. Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informality: On line 2 of page 6, “laser bean” should be “laser beam.” Appropriate correction is required. Claim Objections Claims 1-9 are objected to because of the following informalities: On line 1 of claim 1, “a dToF sensor” should be “a direct time of flight (dToF) sensor…” On line 4 of claim 1, “includes” should be followed by a colon. In claims 1-9, the recited elements should be properly indented. On line 4 of claim 4, the comma after “sensor” should be removed. On line 1 of claim 6, “a dToF sensor” should be “a direct time of flight (dToF) sensor…” On line 4 of claim 6, “including” should be followed by a colon. On line 1 of claim 8, “a dToF sensor” should be “a direct time of flight (dToF) sensor…” On line 1 of claim 9, “a dToF sensor” should be “a direct time of flight (dToF) sensor…” For claim 1, the Examiner suggests the following amendment: 1. (currently amended) A control circuit of a direct time of flight (dToF) sensor, comprising: a memory for storing a program code; and a processor for executing operation in accordance with the program code, wherein the operation includes: counting the number of events detected in a measurement possible region of the dToF sensor by an event-based vision sensor, and determining a measurement target region of the dToF sensor in the measurement possible region according to the number of the events. The remaining claims should be amended similarly. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Wang et al. (US 2022/0308189). With respect to independent claim 1, Wang discloses a control circuit of direct time of flight (dToF) sensor (Abstract), comprising: a memory for storing a program code (Abstract, [0067], and Fig. 15); and a processor for executing operation in accordance with the program code (Abstract, [0067], and Fig. 15), wherein the operation includes: counting the number of events detected in a measurement possible region of the dToF sensors by an event-based vision sensor (Abstract, [0006], [0036]-[0039], [0059], [0063]-[0066], and Figs. 1, 9, and 11-14; image sensors 107); and determining a measurement target region of the dToF sensor in the measurement possible region according to the number of the events (Abstract, [0006], [0036]-[0039], [0059], [0063]-[0066], and Figs. 1, 9, and 11-14). With respect to depending claim 2, Wang discloses wherein the events are counted in each of multiple regions into which the measurement possible region is divided in a prescribed time window, and a region where the number of the events is relatively large among the multiple regions is determined as the measurement target region (Abstract, [0006], [0036]-[0039], [0059], [0063]-[0066], and Figs. 1, 9, and 11-14). With respect to depending claim 3, which depends on claim 2, Wang discloses wherein the region where the number of the events is relatively large includes a first region, and a second region where the number of the events is less than that in the first region, and the first region and the second region are determined in this order as the measurement region (Abstract, [0006], [0036]-[0039], [0059], [0063]-[0066], and Figs. 1, 9, and 11-14). With respect to depending claim 4, Wang discloses wherein the operation further includes setting at least any one of a light source or a mirror included in the dToF sensor toward the measurement target region ([0036] and Fig. 1; pulsed laser source 101). With respect to depending claim 5, Wang discloses wherein, in a case where the number of the events is less than a threshold, determination of the measurement target is refrained (Abstract, [0063]-[0066], and Figs. 12-14). With respect to independent claim 6, Wang discloses a system including a direct time of flight (dToF) sensor (Abstract), the system comprising: at least one device including a memory for storing a program code and a processor for executing operation in accordance with the program code (Abstract, [0067], and Fig. 15), the operation including: counting the number of events detected in a measurement possible region of the dToF sensors by an event-based vision sensor (Abstract, [0006], [0036]-[0039], [0059], [0063]-[0066], and Figs. 1, 9, and 11-14; image sensors 107); and determining a measurement target region of the dToF sensor in the measurement possible region according to the number of the events (Abstract, [0006], [0036]-[0039], [0059], [0063]-[0066], and Figs. 1, 9, and 11-14). With respect to depending claim 7, Wang discloses further comprising: the dToF sensor (Abstract and [0006]); and the event-based vision sensor (Abstract, [0037], and Fig. 1; image sensors 107), wherein the processor is included in a control circuit of the dToF sensor (Abstract and [0067]), and a control circuit of the vision sensor transmits at least information indicating the number of the events to the control circuit of the dToF sensor via a communication interface between the vision sensor and the dToF sensor (Abstract, [0006], [0036]-[0039], [0059], [0063]-[0066], and Figs. 1, 9, and 11-14). With respect to independent claim 8, Wang discloses a method of controlling a direct time of flight (dToF) sensor (Abstract), through operation that is executed by a processor in accordance with a program code stored in a memory (Abstract, [0067], and Fig. 15), the method comprising: counting the number of events detected in a measurement possible region of the dToF sensor by an event-based vision sensor (Abstract, [0006], [0036]-[0039], [0059], [0063]-[0066], and Figs. 1, 9, and 11-14; image sensors 107); and determining a measurement target region of the dToF sensor in the measurement possible region according to the number of the events (Abstract, [0006], [0036]-[0039], [0059], [0063]-[0066], and Figs. 1, 9, and 11-14). With respect to independent claim 9, Wang discloses a program for controlling a direct time of flight (dToF) sensor (Abstract), through operation that is executed by a processor in accordance with the program (Abstract, [0067], and Fig. 15), the program comprising: counting the number of events detected in a measurement possible region of the dToF sensor by an event-based vision sensor (Abstract, [0006], [0036]-[0039], [0059], [0063]-[0066], and Figs. 1, 9, and 11-14; image sensors 107); and determining a measurement target region of the dToF sensor in the measurement possible region according to the number of the events (Abstract, [0006], [0036]-[0039], [0059], [0063]-[0066], and Figs. 1, 9, and 11-14). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Majumdar et al. (US 2018/0045818) teaches a control circuit of a time of flight sensor comprising a memory, a processor, and multiple sensors. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AVI T. SKAIST whose telephone number is (571)272-9348. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:30-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Doug Hutton can be reached at (571) 272-4137. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AVI T SKAIST/Examiner, Art Unit 3674 /WILLIAM D HUTTON JR/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3674
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 18, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12742111
CORROSION-INHIBITING AGENTS FOR REDUCING DISSOLVED OXYGEN CONCENTRATIONS WITHIN UPSTREAM OILFIELD SYSTEMS
1y 4m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12723490
WELLBORE TREATMENT TO REMOVE DAMAGE AND INCREASE PRODUCTION
1y 4m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12716322
INTERVENTION SYSTEM FOR EFFICIENT SEALING
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12716327
ELECTRIC VALVE FOR CONTROLLING THE SCALING OF CONTROL DEVICES IN A PRODUCTION STRING IN A WELL AND A METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE SCALING USING SAID ELECTRIC VALVE
1y 6m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12703823
WELL CLEAN PREMIUM (WCP-1) SYSTEM AND METHOD
1y 10m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+42.4%)
2y 8m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 391 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month