Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/848,211

A Lock Catch Mechanism for a Case, a Case and a Combined Container Thereof

Final Rejection §102§112
Filed
Sep 18, 2024
Examiner
RODRIGUEZ MOLINA, MARCOS JAVIER
Art Unit
3735
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Ningbo Meiqi Tool Co. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
52%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
77%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 52% of resolved cases
52%
Career Allow Rate
75 granted / 145 resolved
-18.3% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+25.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
188
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
49.9%
+9.9% vs TC avg
§102
19.4%
-20.6% vs TC avg
§112
27.8%
-12.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 145 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This Office Action is in response to the Amendment / Request for Reconsideration-After Non-Final Rejection filed on January 19, 2026 wherein: claim(s) 1, 14 were amended, and claim(s) 10 canceled. Examiner notes amendments in claim(s) are directed to overcome rejections under 35 USC § 112 / 35 USC § 102. Therefore, claim(s) 1-9, 11-15 are pending and will be examined. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim(s) 1-9, 11-15 is\are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation --, and the lock catch member (21) is used as a handle for holding; -- [lines 10-11] wherein --holding-- is vague and indefinite. For purposes of examination --holding-- will be interpreted as “handling” by a “user” of the --case-- [line 1]. Claim(s) 2-9, 11-15 rejected by dependency of claim 1. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Baruch et al. (U. S. Patent Application Publication US20200298392A1) hereinafter BARUCH. Regarding claim 1, BARUCH teaches (see FIG. 1 - FIG. 4, FIG. 7, FIG. 9, FIG. 12 - FIG. 15 below) a lock catch mechanism 10 for a case 44 comprising: a lock catch member 15 being rotatably connected to a sidewall of the case body (FIG. 7); one or more elastic members 20 disposed on the sidewall of the case body (FIG. 7); wherein, the lock catch member 15 is capable of rotating (FIG. 13) relative to the case 44 around a horizontally extending rotating shaft (X), and is capable of moving upward (+Y) and downward (-Y) along the sidewall of the case body (FIG. 7), and the lock catch member 15 is used as a handle (FIG. 13) for holding; the lock catch member 15 moves upward (+Y) or downward (-Y) against an elastic restoring force of the one or more elastic members 20 when acted upon by an external force and resets to a rest position (FIG. 14) when the external force withdraws. PNG media_image1.png 529 637 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 450 581 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 604 614 media_image3.png Greyscale PNG media_image4.png 595 589 media_image4.png Greyscale PNG media_image5.png 485 644 media_image5.png Greyscale PNG media_image6.png 480 628 media_image6.png Greyscale PNG media_image7.png 577 660 media_image7.png Greyscale PNG media_image8.png 844 677 media_image8.png Greyscale PNG media_image9.png 737 641 media_image9.png Greyscale PNG media_image10.png 803 641 media_image10.png Greyscale Regarding claim 2, BARUCH teaches (see FIG. 1 - FIG. 4, FIG. 7, FIG. 9, FIG. 12 - FIG. 15 above) lock catch mechanism 10, wherein the lock catch member 15 has a pivot shaft 34 pivoted to the sidewall of the case body (FIG. 7), and the one or more elastic members 20 act on the pivot shaft 34 of the lock catch member 15. Allowable Subject Matter Claim(s) 3-9, 11-15 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments Applicant's claim amendments \ arguments regarding rejections under 35 USC § 112 (in the reply filed January 19, 2026) in view of further examination have been considered and found non persuasive. Furthermore, rejections under 35 USC § 102 in aforementioned reply have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejections (i.e., 35 USC § 102) does not rely on exactly all reference(s) applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the Applicant’s arguments With respect to the art rejections, in accordance with MPEP 2111.01, during examination, the claims must be interpreted as broadly as their terms reasonably allow. In re American Academy of Science Tech Center, 367 F.3d 1359, 70 USPQ2D 1827, 1834 (Fed. Cir. 2004). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Cope et al. (W. I. P. O. Patent Application Publication WO2018220073A1): Teaches a “lid closure” with similar characteristics as the claimed invention. Deng (China Patent Application Publication CN108516209A): Teaches a “hasp” with similar characteristics as the claimed invention. Ben-Gigi (U. S. Patent US9725209B1): Teaches a “stackable tool box” with similar characteristics as the claimed invention. Bensman et al. (U. S. Patent Application Publication US20130127129A1): Teaches a “container assembly” with similar characteristics as the claimed invention. Contact Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MARCOS JAVIER RODRIGUEZ MOLINA whose telephone number is (571) 272-8947. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 7:30 AM to 5:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ANTHONY D. STASHICK can be reached on (571) 272-4561. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /M.J.R.M./ /Anthony D Stashick/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3735
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 18, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 28, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112
Jan 19, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 26, 2026
Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600537
DISPENSING CLOSURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595098
FLUID SAMPLE CONTAINER CAP
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12576313
Device to Releasably Secure Pickleballs
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12570455
PROTECTIVE BRACKET AND USING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12565365
SOLVENT TUBE MANAGEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
52%
Grant Probability
77%
With Interview (+25.5%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 145 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month