Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/848,522

INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD FOR INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, AND PROGRAM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 19, 2024
Priority
Mar 29, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2022015398
Examiner
MANDEVILLE, JASON M
Art Unit
2623
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
56%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 8m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 56% of resolved cases
56%
Career Allowance Rate
409 granted / 737 resolved
-6.5% vs TC avg
Strong +47% interview lift
Without
With
+46.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
779
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
75.2%
+35.2% vs TC avg
§102
16.4%
-23.6% vs TC avg
§112
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 737 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 28 January 2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-3, 5, 7-15, and 17-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Na et al. (hereinafter “Na” US 2013 / 0293488) in view of Frem et al. (hereinafter “Frem” US 2016 / 0357398). As pertaining to Claim 1, Na discloses (see Fig. 1, Fig. 5, Fig. 6, Fig. 11, and Figs. 28 and 29) an information processing apparatus (see (100) in Fig. 1 and Fig. 6; and see Page 1, Para. [0028]) comprising: processing circuitry (see (180) in Fig. 1; see Page 5, Para. [0094]-[0096]) configured to: generate a screen (see (151) in Fig. 11 and Figs. 28 and 29) including an image (see any portion of (151) in Fig. 11 and Figs. 28 and 29, such as (IM) in Figs. 28 and 29) that becomes a target (i.e., a gaze target) of an operation (i.e., a selection operation) by a user (see Page 1, Para. [0005]; Page 2, Para. [0040]-[0041]; and Page 3, Para. [0046]); acquire line-of-sight position information (i.e., gaze information; see (S10, S20) in Fig. 5) representing the image (again, see any portion of (151) in Fig. 11 and Figs. 28 and 29, such as (IM) in Figs. 28 and 29) included in the screen (151) and a line of sight (i.e., a gaze position) of the user who executes the operation (i.e., the selection operation) while viewing the screen (151) including the image (i.e., any portion of (151) in Fig. 11 and Figs. 28 and 29, such as (IM) in Figs. 28 and 29; see Page 6, Para. [0107]; and Page 7, Para. [0115]-[0116] and [0122]); and generate output information (i.e., see (ID) in Fig. 11 and/or see (ED) in Fig. 28 and/or (IP) in Fig. 29) including additional information (i.e., displayed information) representing the acquired line-of-sight position information (i.e., gaze information) of the user and the image (again, see any portion of (151) in Fig. 11 and Figs. 28 and 29, such as (IM) in Figs. 28 and 29) included in the screen (151; see Page 6, Para. [0099]-0103]), wherein the additional information (i.e., displayed information) includes an additional image (i.e., see (ID) in Fig. 11 and/or see (ED) in Fig. 28 and/or (IP) in Fig. 29) representing the position of the line of sight (i.e., the gaze information) of the user; and the processing circuitry (see (180) in Fig. 1) is further configured to generate the output information (i.e., see (ID) in Fig. 11 and/or see (ED) in Fig. 28 and/or (IP) in Fig. 29) through determining contents of the additional image (i.e., see (ID) in Fig. 11 and/or see (ED) in Fig. 28 and/or (IP) in Fig. 29) according to an overlap (see Fig. 11, Fig. 28, and Fig. 29) of the additional image (i.e., see (ID) in Fig. 11 and/or see (ED) in Fig. 28 and/or (IP) in Fig. 29) with the image (again, see any portion of (151) in Fig. 11 and Figs. 28 and 29, such as (IM) in Figs. 28 and 29) included in the screen (151; see Page 7 through Page 8, Para. [0131]-[0133] and Page 9 through Page 10, Para. [0168]-[0170]). Na does not explicitly disclose that determining the contents of the additional image (i.e., see (ID) in Fig. 11 and/or see (ED) in Fig. 28 and/or (IP) in Fig. 29) comprises modifying at least one of the image included in the screen (see any portion of (151) in Fig. 11 and Figs. 28 and 29, such as (IM) in Figs. 28 and 29) and the additional image (again, see (ID) in Fig. 11 and/or see (ED) in Fig. 28 and/or (IP) in Fig. 29) to improve visibility of the additional image as overlaid on the image included in the screen. However, in the same field of endeavor, Frem discloses (see Fig. 1) that it was well-known in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention that visibility of an additional image (112), being overlaid on an image (108) included in a screen (106), can be improved by determining the contents (i.e., the color, size, shape) of the additional image (112) via modifying at least one of the image (108) included in the screen (106; see (124)) and the additional image (112; see (100, 120, 124)) to improve visibility of the additional image (112) as overlaid on the image (108) included in the screen (106; see Page 2, Para. [0019]-[0022]). It is a general goal of Frem to develop techniques and methodologies for enabling a user to identify and interact with displayed additional information efficiently and effectively by building on techniques widely known in the art (see Page 1, Para. [0002]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Na with the teachings of Frem, such that determining the contents of the additional image (i.e., see (ID) in Fig. 11 and/or see (ED) in Fig. 28 and/or (IP) in Fig. 29 of Na) comprises modifying, as suggested by Frem, at least one of the image included in the screen (see any portion of (151) in Fig. 11 and Figs. 28 and 29, such as (IM) in Figs. 28 and 29 of Na) and the additional image (again, see (ID) in Fig. 11 and/or see (ED) in Fig. 28 and/or (IP) in Fig. 29 of Na) to improve visibility of the additional image as overlaid on the image included in the screen in a manner that is well-known in the art to enable efficient identification and interaction with displayed additional information. As pertaining to Claim 2, Na discloses (see Fig. 1, Fig. 5, Fig. 6, Fig. 11, and Figs. 28 and 29) that the image (see any portion of (151) in Fig. 11 and Figs. 28 and 29, such as (IM) in Figs. 28 and 29) that becomes the target (i.e., a gaze target) of the operation (i.e., a selection operation) by the user is a moving image including a plurality of frame images (see Page 1, Para. [0005]; Page 2, Para. [0040]-[0041]), and the processing circuitry (see (180) in Fig. 1; see Page 5, Para. [0094]-[0096]) is further configured to: acquire the line-of-sight position information (i.e., gaze information; see (S10, S20) in Fig. 5) during display of the moving image for the user (i.e., again, see any portion of (151) in Fig. 11 and Figs. 28 and 29, such as (IM) in Figs. 28 and 29 for a frame of a moving image; and see Page 6, Para. [0107]; and Page 7, Para. [0115]-[0116] and [0122]); and generate the output information (i.e., see (ID) in Fig. 11 and/or see (ED) in Fig. 28 and/or (IP) in Fig. 29) by associating the additional information (i.e., displayed information) with a corresponding one of the plurality of frame images (again, see any portion of (151) in Fig. 11 and Figs. 28 and 29, such as (IM) in Figs. 28 and 29 for a frame of a moving image; and see Page 6, Para. [0099]-0103] and Page 7 through Page 8, Para. [0131]-[0133] and Page 9 through Page 10, Para. [0168]-[0170]). As pertaining to Claim 3, Na discloses (see Fig. 1, Fig. 5, Fig. 6, Fig. 11, and Figs. 28 and 29) that the processing circuitry (see (180) in Fig. 1) is further configured to modify the output information (i.e., see (ID) in Fig. 11 and/or see (ED) in Fig. 28 and/or (IP) in Fig. 29) by associating the additional information (i.e., displayed information) representing the acquired line-of-sight position information (i.e., gaze information) of the user acquired during display of at least two consecutive frame images (again, see any portion of (151) in Fig. 11 and Figs. 28 and 29, such as (IM) in Figs. 28 and 29 for a frame of a moving image) of the plurality of frame images (again, see any portion of (151) in Fig. 11 and Figs. 28 and 29, such as (IM) in Figs. 28 and 29 for a frame of a moving image), wherein the at least two consecutive frame images (again, see any portion of (151) in Fig. 11 and Figs. 28 and 29, such as (IM) in Figs. 28 and 29 for a frame of a moving image) including the corresponding frame image of the plurality of frame images (again, see any portion of (151) in Fig. 11 and Figs. 28 and 29, such as (IM) in Figs. 28 and 29 for a frame of a moving image) and at least one of a frame image previous to the corresponding one of the plurality of frame images (again, see any portion of (151) in Fig. 11 and Figs. 28 and 29, such as (IM) in Figs. 28 and 29 for a frame of a moving image) and a frame image subsequent to the corresponding one of the plurality of frame images (again, see any portion of (151) in Fig. 11 and Figs. 28 and 29, such as (IM) in Figs. 28 and 29 for a frame of a moving image; again, see Page 1, Para. [0005]; Page 2, Para. [0040]-[0041]; and see Page 6, Para. [0103] and note that the line-of-sight position information is continuously generated while a user views images, including frames of moving images, on the screen). As pertaining to Claim 5, the combined teachings of Na and Frem disclose (again, see Fig. 1, Fig. 5, Fig. 6, Fig. 11, and Figs. 28 and 29 of Na) that the processing circuitry (again, see (180) in Fig. 1) is further configured to generate the output information (again, see (ID) in Fig. 11 and/or see (ED) in Fig. 28 and/or (IP) in Fig. 29) by disposing the additional image to overlap with the corresponding one of the plurality of frame images (again, see any portion of (151) in Fig. 11 and Figs. 28 and 29, such as (IM) in Figs. 28 and 29 for a frame of a moving image; and see Page 1, Para. [0005] and Page 2, Para. [0040]-[0041]) in reference to the line-of-sight position information (i.e., gaze information) of the user (again, see Page 6, Para. [0099]-0103]; Page 7 through Page 8, Para. [0131]-[0133]; and Page 9 through Page 10, Para. [0168]-[0170]), and modify (see Fig. 1 of Frem) at least one of the image (108) included in the screen (106) and the additional image (112) by at least one of applying blur processing, reducing a size of the additional image (112), adjusting a center of the additional image (112), changing a color of the additional image (112), changing a size of the additional image (112), and changing a shape of the additional image (112) according to an overlap of the additional image (112) with the image (108) included in the screen (106; again, see Page 2, Para. [0019]-[0022]; and see Page 5, Para. [0049] and note that the techniques disclosed by Frem are particularly applicable to the presentation of additional information based on gaze tracking systems; further, note that additional image disclosed by Frem is analogous to the additional image disclosed by Na and that, again, it is a general goal of Frem to improve visibility of the additional image as overlaid on the image included in the screen in a manner that is well-known in the art to enable efficient identification and interaction with displayed additional information). As pertaining to Claim 7, Na discloses (see Fig. 1, Fig. 5, Fig. 6, Fig. 11, and Figs. 28 and 29) that the processing circuitry (see (180) in Fig. 1) is further configured to generate the output information (i.e., see (ID) in Fig. 11 and/or see (ED) in Fig. 28 and/or (IP) in Fig. 29) by deciding a mode (i.e., a display mode) of the additional image (again, see (ID) in Fig. 11 and/or see (ED) in Fig. 28 and/or (IP) in Fig. 29) in reference to information relating to a color of the partial image (i.e., a portion of the displayed image corresponding to the gazing position and/or line-of-sight; again, see Page 6, Para. [0099]-0103]; Page 7 through Page 8, Para. [0131]-[0133]; and Page 9 through Page 10, Para. [0168]-[0170]; and note that, as shown in Fig. 29 for example, output information (IP) is generated to have a display mode that produces information overlapping and distinguished from a color of the partial image). As pertaining to Claim 8, Na discloses (see Fig. 1, Fig. 5, Fig. 6, Fig. 11, and Figs. 28 and 29) that the processing circuitry (see (180) in Fig. 1) is further configured to: acquire information (i.e., gaze information) representing a particular part (i.e., coinciding with the line-of-sight or gaze position) included in the image (again, see any portion of (151) in Fig. 11 and Figs. 28 and 29, such as (IM) in Figs. 28 and 29) that becomes the target (i.e., a gaze target) of the operation (i.e., a selection operation), and determine a position at which the additional image (again, see (ID) in Fig. 11 and/or see (ED) in Fig. 28 and/or (IP) in Fig. 29) is disposed based on the information representing the particular part (i.e., the gaze information; again, see Page 6, Para. [0099]-0103]; Page 7 through Page 8, Para. [0131]-[0133]; and Page 9 through Page 10, Para. [0168]-[0170]). As pertaining to Claim 9, Na discloses (see Fig. 1, Fig. 5, Fig. 6, Fig. 11, and Figs. 28 and 29) that the processing circuitry (see (180) in Fig. 1) is further configured to: acquire information (i.e., gaze information) representing a particular part (i.e., coinciding with the line-of-sight or gaze position) included in the image (again, see any portion of (151) in Fig. 11 and Figs. 28 and 29, such as (IM) in Figs. 28 and 29) that becomes the target (i.e., a gaze target) of the operation (i.e., a selection operation), and determine a mode (i.e., a display mode) of the additional image (again, see (ID) in Fig. 11 and/or see (ED) in Fig. 28 and/or (IP) in Fig. 29) based on the information representing the particular part (i.e., the gaze information; again, see Page 6, Para. [0099]-0103]; Page 7 through Page 8, Para. [0131]-[0133]; and Page 9 through Page 10, Para. [0168]-[0170]). As pertaining to Claim 10, Na discloses (see Fig. 1, Fig. 5, Fig. 6, Fig. 11, and Figs. 28 and 29) a control method for an information processing apparatus (see (100) in Fig. 1 and Fig. 6; and see Page 1, Para. [0028]), the method comprising (see (180) in Fig. 1; see Page 5, Para. [0094]-[0096]): generating a screen (see (151) in Fig. 11 and Figs. 28 and 29) including an image (see any portion of (151) in Fig. 11 and Figs. 28 and 29, such as (IM) in Figs. 28 and 29) that becomes a target (i.e., a gaze target) of an operation (i.e., a selection operation) by a user (see Page 1, Para. [0005]; Page 2, Para. [0040]-[0041]; and Page 3, Para. [0046]), acquiring line-of-sight position information (i.e., gaze information; see (S10, S20) in Fig. 5) representing the image (again, see any portion of (151) in Fig. 11 and Figs. 28 and 29, such as (IM) in Figs. 28 and 29) included in the screen (151) and a line of sight (i.e., a gaze position) of the user who executes the operation (i.e., the selection operation) while viewing the screen (151) including the image (i.e., any portion of (151) in Fig. 11 and Figs. 28 and 29, such as (IM) in Figs. 28 and 29; see Page 6, Para. [0107]; and Page 7, Para. [0115]-[0116] and [0122]); and generating output information (i.e., see (ID) in Fig. 11 and/or see (ED) in Fig. 28 and/or (IP) in Fig. 29) including additional information (i.e., displayed information) representing the acquired line-of-sight position information (i.e., gaze information) of the user and the image (again, see any portion of (151) in Fig. 11 and Figs. 28 and 29, such as (IM) in Figs. 28 and 29) included in the screen (151; see Page 6, Para. [0099]-0103]), wherein the additional information (i.e., displayed information) includes an additional image (i.e., see (ID) in Fig. 11 and/or see (ED) in Fig. 28 and/or (IP) in Fig. 29) representing the position of the line of sight (i.e., the gaze information) of the user; and the processing circuitry (see (180) in Fig. 1) is further configured to generate the output information (i.e., see (ID) in Fig. 11 and/or see (ED) in Fig. 28 and/or (IP) in Fig. 29) through determining contents of the additional image (i.e., see (ID) in Fig. 11 and/or see (ED) in Fig. 28 and/or (IP) in Fig. 29) according to an overlap (see Fig. 11, Fig. 28, and Fig. 29) of the additional image (i.e., see (ID) in Fig. 11 and/or see (ED) in Fig. 28 and/or (IP) in Fig. 29) with the image (again, see any portion of (151) in Fig. 11 and Figs. 28 and 29, such as (IM) in Figs. 28 and 29) included in the screen (151; see Page 7 through Page 8, Para. [0131]-[0133] and Page 9 through Page 10, Para. [0168]-[0170]). Na does not explicitly disclose that determining the contents of the additional image (i.e., see (ID) in Fig. 11 and/or see (ED) in Fig. 28 and/or (IP) in Fig. 29) comprises modifying at least one of the image included in the screen (see any portion of (151) in Fig. 11 and Figs. 28 and 29, such as (IM) in Figs. 28 and 29) and the additional image (again, see (ID) in Fig. 11 and/or see (ED) in Fig. 28 and/or (IP) in Fig. 29) to improve visibility of the additional image as overlaid on the image included in the screen. However, in the same field of endeavor, Frem discloses (see Fig. 1) that it was well-known in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention that visibility of an additional image (112), being overlaid on an image (108) included in a screen (106), can be improved by determining the contents (i.e., the color, size, shape) of the additional image (112) via modifying at least one of the image (108) included in the screen (106; see (124)) and the additional image (112; see (100, 120, 124)) to improve visibility of the additional image (112) as overlaid on the image (108) included in the screen (106; see Page 2, Para. [0019]-[0022]). It is a general goal of Frem to develop techniques and methodologies for enabling a user to identify and interact with displayed additional information efficiently and effectively by building on techniques widely known in the art (see Page 1, Para. [0002]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Na with the teachings of Frem, such that determining the contents of the additional image (i.e., see (ID) in Fig. 11 and/or see (ED) in Fig. 28 and/or (IP) in Fig. 29 of Na) comprises modifying, as suggested by Frem, at least one of the image included in the screen (see any portion of (151) in Fig. 11 and Figs. 28 and 29, such as (IM) in Figs. 28 and 29 of Na) and the additional image (again, see (ID) in Fig. 11 and/or see (ED) in Fig. 28 and/or (IP) in Fig. 29 of Na) to improve visibility of the additional image as overlaid on the image included in the screen in a manner that is well-known in the art to enable efficient identification and interaction with displayed additional information. As pertaining to Claim 11, Na discloses (see Fig. 1, Fig. 5, Fig. 6, Fig. 11, and Figs. 28 and 29) a non-transitory computer readable medium (see (100) in Fig. 1 and Fig. 6; and see Page 1, Para. [0028]) storing a program for causing a computer to perform a method (see (180) in Fig. 1; see Page 5, Para. [0094]-[0096]), the method comprising: generating a screen (see (151) in Fig. 11 and Figs. 28 and 29) including an image (see any portion of (151) in Fig. 11 and Figs. 28 and 29, such as (IM) in Figs. 28 and 29) that becomes a target (i.e., a gaze target) of an operation (i.e., a selection operation) by a user (see Page 1, Para. [0005]; Page 2, Para. [0040]-[0041]; and Page 3, Para. [0046]), acquiring line-of-sight position information (i.e., gaze information; see (S10, S20) in Fig. 5) representing the image (again, see any portion of (151) in Fig. 11 and Figs. 28 and 29, such as (IM) in Figs. 28 and 29) included in the screen (151) and a line of sight (i.e., a gaze position) of the user who executes the operation (i.e., the selection operation) while viewing the screen (151) including the image (i.e., any portion of (151) in Fig. 11 and Figs. 28 and 29, such as (IM) in Figs. 28 and 29; see Page 6, Para. [0107]; and Page 7, Para. [0115]-[0116] and [0122]); and generating output information (i.e., see (ID) in Fig. 11 and/or see (ED) in Fig. 28 and/or (IP) in Fig. 29) including additional information (i.e., displayed information) representing the acquired line-of-sight position information (i.e., gaze information) of the user and the image (again, see any portion of (151) in Fig. 11 and Figs. 28 and 29, such as (IM) in Figs. 28 and 29) included in the screen (151; see Page 6, Para. [0099]-0103]), wherein the additional information (i.e., displayed information) includes an additional image (i.e., see (ID) in Fig. 11 and/or see (ED) in Fig. 28 and/or (IP) in Fig. 29) representing the position of the line of sight (i.e., the gaze information) of the user; and generating further comprising determining contents of the additional image (i.e., see (ID) in Fig. 11 and/or see (ED) in Fig. 28 and/or (IP) in Fig. 29) according to an overlap (see Fig. 11, Fig. 28, and Fig. 29) of the additional image (i.e., see (ID) in Fig. 11 and/or see (ED) in Fig. 28 and/or (IP) in Fig. 29) with the image (again, see any portion of (151) in Fig. 11 and Figs. 28 and 29, such as (IM) in Figs. 28 and 29) included in the screen (151; see Page 7 through Page 8, Para. [0131]-[0133] and Page 9 through Page 10, Para. [0168]-[0170]). Na does not explicitly disclose that determining the contents of the additional image (i.e., see (ID) in Fig. 11 and/or see (ED) in Fig. 28 and/or (IP) in Fig. 29) comprises modifying at least one of the image included in the screen (see any portion of (151) in Fig. 11 and Figs. 28 and 29, such as (IM) in Figs. 28 and 29) and the additional image (again, see (ID) in Fig. 11 and/or see (ED) in Fig. 28 and/or (IP) in Fig. 29) to improve visibility of the additional image as overlaid on the image included in the screen. However, in the same field of endeavor, Frem discloses (see Fig. 1) that it was well-known in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention that visibility of an additional image (112), being overlaid on an image (108) included in a screen (106), can be improved by determining the contents (i.e., the color, size, shape) of the additional image (112) via modifying at least one of the image (108) included in the screen (106; see (124)) and the additional image (112; see (100, 120, 124)) to improve visibility of the additional image (112) as overlaid on the image (108) included in the screen (106; see Page 2, Para. [0019]-[0022]). It is a general goal of Frem to develop techniques and methodologies for enabling a user to identify and interact with displayed additional information efficiently and effectively by building on techniques widely known in the art (see Page 1, Para. [0002]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Na with the teachings of Frem, such that determining the contents of the additional image (i.e., see (ID) in Fig. 11 and/or see (ED) in Fig. 28 and/or (IP) in Fig. 29 of Na) comprises modifying, as suggested by Frem, at least one of the image included in the screen (see any portion of (151) in Fig. 11 and Figs. 28 and 29, such as (IM) in Figs. 28 and 29 of Na) and the additional image (again, see (ID) in Fig. 11 and/or see (ED) in Fig. 28 and/or (IP) in Fig. 29 of Na) to improve visibility of the additional image as overlaid on the image included in the screen in a manner that is well-known in the art to enable efficient identification and interaction with displayed additional information. As pertaining to Claim 12, Na discloses (see Fig. 1, Fig. 5, Fig. 6, Fig. 11, and Figs. 28 and 29) that the additional information (i.e., displayed information) includes a range (i.e., a display area) in which the additional image (i.e., see (ID) in Fig. 11 and/or see (ED) in Fig. 28 and/or (IP) in Fig. 29) is to overlap with the image (again, see any portion of (151) in Fig. 11 and Figs. 28 and 29, such as (IM) in Figs. 28 and 29) included in the screen (151; again, see Page 7 through Page 8, Para. [0131]-[0133] and Page 9 through Page 10, Para. [0168]-[0170]). As pertaining to Claim 13, the combined teachings of Na and Frem disclose (see Fig. 1, Fig. 5, Fig. 6, Fig. 11, and Figs. 28 and 29 of Na) that the processing circuitry (see (180) in Fig. 1) is further configured to determine a content of the image (again, see any portion of (151) in Fig. 11 and Figs. 28 and 29, such as (IM) in Figs. 28 and 29) included in the screen (151), and change a content of the additional image (i.e., see (ID) in Fig. 11 and/or see (ED) in Fig. 28 and/or (IP) in Fig. 29) based on the content of the image (again, see any portion of (151) in Fig. 11 and Figs. 28 and 29, such as (IM) in Figs. 28 and 29) included in the screen (151; again, see Fig. 29 with Page 9 through Page 10, Para. [0168]-[0170]), wherein changing the content of the additional image (again, see (ID) in Fig. 11 and/or see (ED) in Fig. 28 and/or (IP) in Fig. 29 of Na) comprises at least one of (see Fig. 1 of Frem) applying blur processing, reducing a size of the additional image (112), adjusting a center of the additional image (112), changing a color of the additional image (112), changing a size of the additional image (112), and changing a shape of the additional image (112) according to an overlap of the additional image (112) with the image (108) included in the screen (106; again, see Page 2, Para. [0019]-[0022]; and see Page 5, Para. [0049] and note that the techniques disclosed by Frem are particularly applicable to the presentation of additional information based on gaze tracking systems; further, note that additional image disclosed by Frem is analogous to the additional image disclosed by Na and that, again, it is a general goal of Frem to improve visibility of the additional image as overlaid on the image included in the screen in a manner that is well-known in the art to enable efficient identification and interaction with displayed additional information). As pertaining to Claim 14, Na discloses (see Fig. 1, Fig. 5, Fig. 6, Fig. 11, and Figs. 28 and 29) that the range (i.e., the display area) in which the additional image (i.e., see (ID) in Fig. 11 and/or see (ED) in Fig. 28 and/or (IP) in Fig. 29) is to overlap with the image (again, see any portion of (151) in Fig. 11 and Figs. 28 and 29, such as (IM) in Figs. 28 and 29) included in the screen (151) is allowed to change when a difference between a previous line-of-sight position information (i.e., a previous gaze information) and a current line-of-sight position information (i.e., a current gaze information) exceeds a predefined threshold (i.e., as defined by the contents of the image; again, see Page 7 through Page 8, Para. [0131]-[0133] and Page 9 through Page 10, Para. [0168]-[0170]; and note, for example as shown in Fig. 29, that a range in which the additional image is disposed is based on a gaze position as associated with a target in an image such that the range only changes as the gaze position moves to be directed to a different target, or moves beyond the predefined threshold defined by the position of the current target). As pertaining to Claim 15, Na discloses (see Fig. 1, Fig. 5, Fig. 6, Fig. 11, and Figs. 28 and 29) that the range (i.e., the display area) includes a region circumscribed about points (i.e., gazing positions) represented by two or more aspects of the line-of-sight position information (i.e., gaze information) corresponding to the image included in the screen (151; again, see Page 7 through Page 8, Para. [0131]-[0133] and Page 9 through Page 10, Para. [0168]-[0170] and note that the line-of-sight position information is continuously generated while a user views images). As pertaining to Claim 17, Na discloses (see Fig. 1, Fig. 5, Fig. 6, Fig. 11, and Figs. 28 and 29) that the processing circuitry (again, see (180) in Fig. 1) is further configured to generate the output information (again, see (ID) in Fig. 11 and/or see (ED) in Fig. 28 and/or (IP) in Fig. 29) in synchrony (i.e., overlapping) with the image (see any portion of (151) in Fig. 11 and Figs. 28 and 29, such as (IM) in Figs. 28 and 29) included in the screen (see (151); and again, see Page 6, Para. [0099]-0103]; Page 7 through Page 8, Para. [0131]-[0133]; and Page 9 through Page 10, Para. [0168]-[0170]). As pertaining to Claim 18, Na discloses (see Fig. 1, Fig. 5, Fig. 6, Fig. 11, and Figs. 28 and 29) that the processing circuitry (again, see (180) in Fig. 1) is further configured to include the output information (again, see (ID) in Fig. 11 and/or see (ED) in Fig. 28 and/or (IP) in Fig. 29) including the additional information (i.e., displayed information) with sound information of the image (see any portion of (151) in Fig. 11 and Figs. 28 and 29, such as (IM) in Figs. 28 and 29) included in the screen (see (151); see Page 3, Para. [0046] and [0057]; and again, see Page 6, Para. [0099]-0103]; Page 7 through Page 8, Para. [0131]-[0133]; and Page 9 through Page 10, Para. [0168]-[0170]). As pertaining to Claim 19, Na discloses (see Fig. 1, Fig. 5, Fig. 6, Fig. 11, and Figs. 28 and 29) that the processing circuitry (again, see (180) in Fig. 1) is further configured to include the output information (again, see (ID) in Fig. 11 and/or see (ED) in Fig. 28 and/or (IP) in Fig. 29) including the additional information (i.e., displayed information) with sound information of the image (see any portion of (151) in Fig. 11 and Figs. 28 and 29, such as (IM) in Figs. 28 and 29) included in the screen (see (151); see Page 3, Para. [0046] and [0057]; and again, see Page 6, Para. [0099]-0103]; Page 7 through Page 8, Para. [0131]-[0133]; and Page 9 through Page 10, Para. [0168]-[0170]). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to Claims 1-3, 5, 7-15 and 17-19 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on a combination of references applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. The applicant has argued that none of the references relied upon by the examiner in the prior Office Action, particularly Na, teach or fairly suggest “modifying at least one of the image included in the screen and the additional image to improve visibility of the additional image as overlaid on the image included in the screen” as newly recited in at least the independent claims (see Remarks at Pages 7 and 8). Respectfully, this argument is moot in view of at least the combined teachings of Na and Frem, as newly relied upon in the above rejections. In fact, the examiner respectfully maintains that the modification of an “additional image” to improve visibility of the additional image as overlaid on an image on a screen is a technique that is well-known in the art. Therefore, the rejection of Claims 1-3, 5, 7-15, and 17-19 is maintained. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The prior art is replete with references directed to the generation and output of “additional information” based on a position of a line-of-sight of a user relative to an image on a display screen. All of the following references are relevant to the claimed invention: Kim et al. (US 2023 / 0071037), Hwang (US 2019 / 0354178), Kawamura (US 2018 / 0348969), Park (US 2018 / 0321739), and Baldwin et al. (US 2012 / 0256967). The prior art is replete with references directed to the modification of an “additional image” to improve visibility of the additional image as overlaid on an image on a screen. All of the following references are relevant to the claimed invention: Akashi (JP-3370225), Moffett (US 2014 / 0208273), King et al. (US 2013 / 0135288), and Rogalski et al. (US 2006 / 0095867). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JASON M MANDEVILLE whose telephone number is (571)270-3136. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 7:30AM-4:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chanh Nguyen can be reached at 571-272-7772. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JASON M MANDEVILLE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2623
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 19, 2024
Application Filed
May 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Aug 06, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 28, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jan 28, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 03, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12633250
GATE DRIVING CIRCUIT AND DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
1y 8m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12620345
DISPLAY APPARATUS
1y 7m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12614494
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR OBTAINING CORRESPONDENCES BETWEEN GRAYSCALES AND GRAYSCALE VOLTAGES, AND DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 1m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12579923
METHOD TO IMPLEMENT GLOBAL DIMMING FOR MICROLED DISPLAY
1y 11m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12571941
PLASTIC OPTICAL PRODUCT AND PLASTIC SPECTACLE LENS
2y 11m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
56%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+46.7%)
3y 4m (~1y 8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 737 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month