Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/848,881

PRODUCTION METHOD FOR DECORATIVE SHEET, AND DECORATIVE SHEET

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Sep 19, 2024
Priority
Mar 23, 2022 — JP 2022-047419 +1 more
Examiner
GUGLIOTTA, NICOLE T
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Toppan Holdings Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
52%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 5m
Est. Remaining
54%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 52% of resolved cases
52%
Career Allowance Rate
316 granted / 604 resolved
-7.7% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+2.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
655
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
48.9%
+8.9% vs TC avg
§102
17.7%
-22.3% vs TC avg
§112
24.7%
-15.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 604 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group IV (claim 7) in the reply filed on August 31, 2026 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Shinbara (US 2018/0257328 A1) *Continuing Education Center, “The science of visible light and its impact on paint” With regard to claim 7, Shinbara teaches a decorative sheet (1) comprising, in order, a surface protecting layer (9) (“surface protective layer”), a transparent resin layer (6), a pictorial pattern (4) comprising ink (i.e., paint), and a base material sheet (3) that includes a thermoplastic resin, which may be colored (i.e., “a colored resin layer”) (paragraph [0084] – [0085] & Fig. 1 shown below). An embossed part (10) is formed at a position on the surface protecting layer that overlaps a portion formed of the predetermined material of the pattern layers. PNG media_image1.png 302 436 media_image1.png Greyscale Although not shown in a figure, Shinbara et al. teach synchronized picture pattern layers (4) may be present on both the front and back surfaces of the base material sheet (3), wherein the pictorial pattern layer on the back surface is position between the backer layer (2) and the base material sheet (3) (paragraphs [0072] & [0107]). Shinbara does not explicitly teach the pictorial pattern layer on the backside of the base layer has higher light absorptivity than colored resin of the base layer. However, as evidenced by Continuing Education Center, when a beam of light is projected onto a painted object, the object will absorb some wavelengths while reflecting others. For instance, a red object absorbs all but the red wavelengths. Furthermore, an object may appear yellow if the object absorbs blue light but reflects green and red light because when these wavelengths mix, they create yellow. Therefore, the wavelengths of visible light are absorbed by the ink of the picture pattern layer except the wavelength of light that can be seen with the human eye (i.e., unseen wavelengths of visible light). As such, said unseen wavelengths of visible light inherently have higher absorption in the ink (paint) of the picture pattern layer than the colored transparent resin of the base layer. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over *Tomohiro (JP 2004 – 322568 A). *English translation submitted by Applicant on 9/19/2024. With regard to claim 7, Tomohiro teaches a decorative layer (i.e., “sheet”) comprising a pattern layer (2/2a) comprising pigment, dyes, and inks having different infrared absorbing patterns to form a color pattern or grain pattern (i.e., “pictorial pattern layer”) (paragraphs [0020], [0023], & [0025]), a transparent thermoplastic resin layer (3) (i.e., “transparent resin layer”), and a top coat layer (4) (i.e., “surface protective layer”) deposited in this order on a decorative material substrate (1) (i.e., “colored resin layer”) (paragraph [0030]). The pattern layer includes an infrared absorbing layer (2a) comprising an infrared absorbing agent (paragraphs [0023] – [0024]), which has higher infrared absorbing properties than the colored polyolefin resin substrate layer free of any infrared absorbing agent (paragraphs [0019], [0030], & [0040]). The decorative layer has a surface uneven shape (5) (i.e., “embossed shape”) such that the uneven shape is formed only in the are directly above (overlaps/synchronized with) a pattern (i.e., predetermined material) of the picture layer (paragraphs [0021], [0029], [0033], & Fig. 1). PNG media_image2.png 400 562 media_image2.png Greyscale Tomohiro does not explicitly teach a pattern layer, in which a predetermined material having higher light absorption properties with respect to light of a predetermined wavelength than the colored resin layer (base layer) is arranged to synchronize with a pictorial pattern on the pictorial pattern layer is deposited on the other surface of the colored resin layer (base layer). Tomohiro teaches the decorative layer is used as surface decoration on various building material surfaces (paragraph [0001]). Therefore, in the instance of a transparent building material, such as a window, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the effective filing date to desire a decorative effect on both front and back surfaces of the substrate (1) such that the decoration can be viewed from both sides of the window. This would result in a decorative material comprising a decorative pattern comprising a second pattern layer (2’), a second thermoplastic layer (3’) and second top coat layer (4’) on both the front and back surfaces of the substrate (1), wherein the second pattern layer of predetermined material having a higher infrared light absorption properties with respect to light of a predetermined wavelength (infrared) than the decorative (colored) substrate layer arranged to synchronize with a pictorial pattern on the pictorial pattern layer. The courts have held that mere duplication of parts has no patentable significance unless a new and unexpected result is produced. In re Harza, 274 F.2d 669, 124 USPQ 378 (CCPA 1960). See MPEP 2144.04.VI.B. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NICOLE T GUGLIOTTA whose telephone number is (571)270-1552. The examiner can normally be reached M - F (9 a.m. to 10 p.m.). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Frank Vineis can be reached at 571-270-1547. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NICOLE T GUGLIOTTA/Examiner, Art Unit 1781 /ALICIA J WEYDEMEYER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1781
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 19, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746739
SMOOTH SURFACE HYBRID COMPOSITES
4y 10m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12715195
Multilayer Film Having Excellent Recoverability
3y 10m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12704663
PROTECTION FILM STRUCTURE WITH COMPOSITE HARDENING LAYER
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12697837
DRAWING SUBSTRATE
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12692352
DETECTABLE AND MULTI DETECTABLE ARTICLES
6y 0m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
52%
Grant Probability
54%
With Interview (+2.1%)
3y 5m (~1y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 604 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month