Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026
Application No. 18/849,061

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONFIGURING IP ADDRESS TO INTEGRATED ACCESS AND BACKHAUL NODE IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 20, 2024
Priority
Apr 08, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0043959 +1 more
Examiner
LEE, CHI HO A
Art Unit
2475
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allowance Rate
1279 granted / 1388 resolved
+34.1% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+4.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1434
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
§103
43.3%
+3.3% vs TC avg
§102
21.9%
-18.1% vs TC avg
§112
14.6%
-25.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1388 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 16-19, 21-29 and 31-35 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over YI et al PG PUB 2024/0163951 in view of WU PG PUB 2024/0324039. Re Claims 16, 21, 26 and 31, YI et al teaches in figure 4D, a IAB (a IAB node comprises a transceiver and processor) operating in a dual connectivity (NR-DC); in a case, figure 4D teaches a IAB-MT3 (an IAB-MT node) coupled with the Donor CU (IAB-donor central unit) in a SCG performing a MCG link recovery or IP session, identifying whether a SRB3 is configured [0080] and if configured, transmitting an IABotherinformation message to IAB-MT2 (a second node comprising a transceiver and a processor) via the SRB3 [0155]; in case that the SRB3 is not configured, transmitting a RRC message comprising to the IABotherinformation message to the MeNB (a master node) [0081] and providing the IABotherinformation message to a PHY layer (a lower layer). YI et al fails to explicitly teach “in the case that IAB-MT node performs the IP related-procedure…providing the IABotherinformation message…”. WU teaches once BH RLC channel is modified [0081], this is analogous to MCG link recovery in YI et al, routing update procedure is performed by the IAB MT by exchanging IABtherinformation messages with the IAB-CU to obtain/request an IP address. By combining the teachings, once the MCG link recovery completed in YI et al, the IAB-MT can perform routing update procedure to send packets across the network. One skilled in the art would have been motivated to have performed the routing update procedure after the MCG recovery to re-establish lost IP session. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skilled to have combined the teachings. Re Claims 17, 22, 27, 32, YI et al teaches the NR-DC with IAB-MT. Re Claims 18, 23, 25, 28, 33, 35, WU teaches the IABotherinformation message used for requesting the IP address. Re Claims 19, 24, 29, 34, YI et al teaches the RRC message can include a ULInformationTransferMRDC message [0140]. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 20 and 30 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Re Claims 20 and 30, prior art fails to teach the IABotherinformation message within the ULInformationTranferMRDC message as claimed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANDREW LEE whose telephone number is (571)272-3130. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:30AM-5PM ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, KASSIM KHALAD can be reached at 5712703770. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANDREW LEE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2475
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 20, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Sep 04, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12771586
METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING HE-LTF SEQUENCE AND APPARATUS
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12772032
DATA TRANSMISSION METHOD AND APPARATUS, TERMINAL DEVICE AND NETWORK TERMINAL
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12764733
CELL MONITORING IN CROSS-CARRIER SCHEDULING
3y 8m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12756511
INDICATION OF TRACKING REFERENCE SIGNAL PRESENCE
3y 2m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12757199
PERFORMING ACTIONS FOR TRANSMISSIONS OF A DEVICE CAPABLE OF ENERGY HARVESTING
2y 6m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+4.6%)
2y 3m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1388 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month