Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/849,262

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR HPLMN CONTROL FOR DISCONTINUOUS COVERAGE IN SATELLITE ACCESS NETWORK

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 20, 2024
Priority
Mar 23, 2022 — IN 202241016042 +3 more
Examiner
CUNNINGHAM, KEVIN M
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
434 granted / 605 resolved
+11.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
648
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
§103
59.8%
+19.8% vs TC avg
§102
11.8%
-28.2% vs TC avg
§112
21.8%
-18.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 605 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Applicant’s claim to priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(a) to foreign applications filed on March 23, 2022 and August 16, 2022 is acknowledged. However, the subject matter disclosed in claims 16-30, is not disclosed in the foreign applications in the manner required by 35 U.S.C. 112(a). Accordingly, claims 16-30 are not entitled to the benefit of the filing date of the foreign application for this subject matter. See MPEP 2163. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 16-30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sadique et al (US 2022/0232463, hereinafter Sadique). Regarding claim 16, Sadique discloses a method performed by a terminal in a wireless communication system, the method comprising: receiving, from an access and mobility management function (AMF) entity, configuration information including an indicator indicating whether the terminal is allowed to disable a satellite next generation radio access network (NG-RAN) capability (configuration setting for the UE can be sent by the AMF to the UE, Para [0166], the configuration setting can prioritize NTN NG-RAN over terrestrial NG-RAN or can disable NTN NG-RAN, Para [0165], obvious variation to one of ordinary skill if NTN NG-RAN has priority over terrestrial NG-RAN then the UE wouldn’t be allowed to disable satellite access or it is given an indicate to disable, which means the UE is allowed to do it); transmitting, to the AMF entity, a REGISTRATION REQUEST message (UE initiates a registration procedure, NAS request and AMF receives request from the UE, Para [0138, 139], UE sends registration request to AMF, Para [0128]); and receiving, from the AMF entity, REGISTRATION REJECT message including a cause value indicating whether a satellite NG-RAN is allowed in a public land mobile network (PLMN) (the AMF may send a registration reject, Para [0128], AMF sends NAS response which can be a registration reject with cause, Para [0140], the cause can be NG-RAN access is not allowed, 5GC on first PLMN does not allow satellite NG-RAN access to the UE, Para [0130]). Regarding claims 17, 21, 25 and 29, Sadique discloses the method/terminal/AMF of claim 16/20/24/28, further comprising: in case that the indicator indicates that the terminal is allowed to disable the satellite NG-RAN capability and the cause value indicates that the satellite NG-RAN is not allowed in the PLMN, disabling the satellite NG-RAN capability and searching for a suitable cell in another tracking area (in response to the rejection, UE stops attempting registration for NTN access and searches for terrestrial access on same PLMN, Para [0130], UE performs searches for terrestrial networks, Para [0170]). Regarding claims 18, 22, 26 and 30, Sadique discloses the method/terminal/AMF of claim 16/20/24/28, further comprising: in case that the indicator indicates that the terminal is not allowed to disable the satellite NG-RAN capability, ignoring the cause value (UE can resume PLMN search for NTN access for multiple reasons, Para [0131], obvious to one of ordinary skill, in one case the UE prioritizes the NTN NG-RAN over terrestrial NG-RAN, Para [0165], or this case is it is not allowed to disable satellite capability). Regarding claims 19, 23 and 27, Sadique discloses the method/terminal of claim 17/21/25, further comprising: starting a timer for a subsequent PLMN selection based on the disabling of the satellite NG-RAN capability (search timer for the UE to perform searching for terrestrial networks, Para [0170], UE starts search after stopping search for NTN access after the rejection with cause message, Para [0130], obvious to one of ordinary skill to start search timer when starting a new search). Regarding claim 20, Sadique discloses a method performed by an access and mobility management function (AMF) entity in a wireless communication system, the method comprising: transmitting, to a terminal, configuration information including an indicator indicating whether the terminal is allowed to disable a satellite next generation radio access network (NG-RAN) capability (configuration setting for the UE can be sent by the AMF to the UE, Para [0166], the configuration setting can prioritize NTN NG-RAN over terrestrial NG-RAN or can disable NTN NG-RAN, Para [0165], obvious variation to one of ordinary skill if NTN NG-RAN has priority over terrestrial NG-RAN then the UE wouldn’t be allowed to disable satellite access or it is given an indicate to disable, which means the UE is allowed to do it); receiving, from the terminal, a REGISTRATION REQUEST message (UE initiates a registration procedure, NAS request and AMF receives request from the UE, Para [0138, 139], UE sends registration request to AMF, Para [0128]); and transmitting, to the terminal, REGISTRATION REJECT message including a cause value indicating whether a satellite NG-RAN is allowed in a public land mobile network (PLMN) (the AMF may send a registration reject, Para [0128], AMF sends NAS response which can be a registration reject with cause, Para [0140], the cause can be NG-RAN access is not allowed, 5GC on first PLMN does not allow satellite NG-RAN access to the UE, Para [0130]). Regarding claim 24, Sadique discloses a terminal (UE, Fig. 3) in a wireless communication system, the terminal comprising: a transceiver and a controller (communication circuits and processor, Fig. 3) coupled with the transceiver and configured to: receive, from an access and mobility management function (AMF) entity, configuration information including an indicator indicating whether the terminal is allowed to disable a satellite next generation radio access network (NG-RAN) capability (configuration setting for the UE can be sent by the AMF to the UE, Para [0166], the configuration setting can prioritize NTN NG-RAN over terrestrial NG-RAN or can disable NTN NG-RAN, Para [0165], obvious variation to one of ordinary skill if NTN NG-RAN has priority over terrestrial NG-RAN then the UE wouldn’t be allowed to disable satellite access or it is given an indicate to disable, which means the UE is allowed to do it); transmit, to the AMF entity, a REGISTRATION REQUEST message (UE initiates a registration procedure, NAS request and AMF receives request from the UE, Para [0138, 139], UE sends registration request to AMF, Para [0128]); and receive, from the AMF entity, REGISTRATION REJECT message including a cause value indicating whether a satellite NG-RAN is allowed in a public land mobile network (PLMN) (the AMF may send a registration reject, Para [0128], AMF sends NAS response which can be a registration reject with cause, Para [0140], the cause can be NG-RAN access is not allowed, 5GC on first PLMN does not allow satellite NG-RAN access to the UE, Para [0130]). Regarding claim 28, Sadique discloses an access and mobility management function (AMF, Para [0007]) entity in a wireless communication system, the AMF entity comprising: a transceiver and a controller (transceiver and processor, inherent) coupled with the transceiver and configured to: transmit, to a terminal, configuration information including an indicator indicating whether the terminal is allowed to disable a satellite next generation radio access network (NG-RAN) capability (configuration setting for the UE can be sent by the AMF to the UE, Para [0166], the configuration setting can prioritize NTN NG-RAN over terrestrial NG-RAN or can disable NTN NG-RAN, Para [0165], obvious variation to one of ordinary skill if NTN NG-RAN has priority over terrestrial NG-RAN then the UE wouldn’t be allowed to disable satellite access or it is given an indicate to disable, which means the UE is allowed to do it); receive, from the terminal, a REGISTRATION REQUEST message (UE initiates a registration procedure, NAS request and AMF receives request from the UE, Para [0138, 139], UE sends registration request to AMF, Para [0128]); and transmit, to the terminal, REGISTRATION REJECT message including a cause value indicating whether a satellite NG-RAN is allowed in a public land mobile network (PLMN) (the AMF may send a registration reject, Para [0128], AMF sends NAS response which can be a registration reject with cause, Para [0140], the cause can be NG-RAN access is not allowed, 5GC on first PLMN does not allow satellite NG-RAN access to the UE, Para [0130]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KEVIN CUNNINGHAM whose telephone number is (571) 272-1765. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Thursday 7:30-18:00 (EST). If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Huy Vu can be reached on (571) 272-3155. The fax number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KEVIN M CUNNINGHAM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2461
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 20, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12745241
OPTIMIZED UPLINK CONFIGURED GRANT ON NEW RADIO CARRIER AGGREGATION PRIMARY AND SECONDARY CELLS
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12744570
USER PAIRING METHOD AND APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12739870
ANCHOR AND COMPLEMENTARY BANDWIDTH PARTS FOR FULL-DUPLEX OPERATIONS
5y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12739884
TRANSMIT OPPORTUNITY SHARING IN A RESTRICTED TARGET WAIT TIME
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12732921
MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE EXPOSURE (MPE) UPLINK (UL) BUDGET PRIORITIZATION FOR PHYSICAL UPLINK CONTROL CHANNEL (PUCCH) AND PHYSICAL UPLINK SHARED CHANNEL (PUSCH)
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+11.2%)
2y 9m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 605 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month