Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/850,083

MOBILE OBJECT CONTROL DEVICE, MOBILE OBJECT CONTROL METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 24, 2024
Priority
Mar 28, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2022014975
Examiner
CAMBY, RICHARD M
Art Unit
3661
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
795 granted / 891 resolved
+37.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
906
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.1%
-32.9% vs TC avg
§103
36.2%
-3.8% vs TC avg
§102
25.6%
-14.4% vs TC avg
§112
8.2%
-31.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 891 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 2, 6, 11 and 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over JP2019149013. The JP ‘013 reference discloses all features of the claimed invention in the abstract and claims, as described below, but for the specifics of the mobile object stopping where a state of the traffic light is detectable. [Claim 1] A mobile object control device for controlling a mobile object capable of moving at least in a predetermined region different from a roadway and on a crosswalk, the mobile object(automobile 2) control device comprising: a recognition unit(automatic drive controller1) configured to recognize a surrounding situation of the mobile object on the basis of an output of an external environment detection device configured to detect an external situation of the mobile object; and a control unit configured to control at least a drive unit configured to move the mobile object ,wherein the control unit controls the drive unit on the basis of a situation of an intersection recognized by the recognition unit so that the mobile object is stopped when the mobile object is moving in the predetermined region(Abstract “Solution: an automatic drive controller 1 includes a standby position determination unit 13 that, when a sidewalk travelling automobile has to be halted because a traffic light installed on a road to be crossed enters a state restricting crossing----an automatic driving control unit 14 that halts the sidewalk travelling automobile2 at the standby position”) and the recognition unit recognizes that the mobile object needs to stop in accordance with a state of a first traffic light located in a movement direction of the mobile object in front of the intersection.(See the abstract and claim 1 of the translation of JP’013 Foreign reference filed 09/24/2024 50 pages)(The stop light is inherently in front of the vehicle in the moving direction and the sidewalk of the translation of JP’013 is a crosswalk) ,wherein the control unit causes the mobile object to stop at a first position where a state of the first traffic light is detectable by the external environment detection device. This is considered old and well known and would be obvious here in order to view the light that is controlling the intersection. .(The waiting position of claim 1 of JP ‘013 is regarded as the first position determined by the automatic driving control device) [Claim 2] The mobile object control device according to claim1, wherein the recognition unit recognizes a shape of a region around the intersection including a position of the crosswalk in a process in which the mobile object approaches the intersection and causes a memory to store shape information that is a recognition result, and wherein the control unit controls the drive unit on the basis of the shape information stored in the memory.(see claims 1-3 of JP ‘013 that inherently stores the shape of the sidewalk area in order to determine the waiting area and if the sidewalk area that is not blocked) [Claim 3] The mobile object control device according to claim 1, wherein the control unit causes the mobile object to stop at a first position where a state of the first traffic light is detectable by the external environment detection device Claim 6] The mobile object control device according to claim1, wherein the recognition unit recognizes traffic participants located near the intersection, and wherein the control unit causes the mobile object to stop at a position where a flow of the traffic participants moving near the intersection without stopping is not blocked.(From claims 1-3 of JP’013 the moving area of the pedestrians in the sidewalk is not blocked so the traffic in front of the crosswalk is inherently not blocked.) [Claim 11] A mobile object control method to be executed by a processor for controlling a mobile object capable of moving at least in a predetermined region different from a roadway and on a crosswalk, the mobile object control method comprising: recognizing a surrounding situation of the mobile object on the basis of an output of an external environment detection device configured to detect an external situation of the mobile object; and controlling a drive unit of the mobile object on the basis of a recognized situation of an intersection so that the mobile object is stopped when the mobile object is moving in the predetermined region and it is recognized that the mobile object needs to stop in accordance with a state of a first traffic light located in a movement direction of the mobile object in front of the intersection; and causing the mobile object to stop at a first position where a state of the first traffic light is detectable by the external environment detection device. (follows from claim 1) [Claim 12] A storage medium storing a program for causing a processor for controlling a mobile object capable of moving at least in a predetermined region different from a roadway and on a crosswalk to: recognize a surrounding situation of the mobile object on the basis of an output of an external environment detection device configured to detect an external situation of the mobile object; and control a drive unit of the mobile object on the basis of a recognized situation of an intersection so that the mobile object is stopped when the mobile object is moving in the predetermined region and it is recognized that the mobile object needs to stop in accordance with a state of a first traffic light located in a movement direction of the mobile object in front of the intersection and causing the mobile object to stop at a first position where a state of the first traffic light is detectable by the external environment detection device..(follows from claim 1) Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-5 and 7-10 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 13-15 are allowed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RICHARD M CAMBY whose telephone number is (571)272-6958. The examiner can normally be reached M - F flex. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Peter D Nolan can be reached at 571 270 7016. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RICHARD M CAMBY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3661
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 24, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Mar 19, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12703243
Multi-Screen Interaction Method and Apparatus, Terminal Device, and Vehicle
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12681192
INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, PROGRAM, AND POSITIONING METHOD
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679450
VEHICLE AXLE AND ITS ARRANGEMENT ON A VEHICLE
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12682693
VEHICLE SYSTEM FOR A VEHICLE AND ASSOCIATED METHOD FOR OPERATING THE VEHICLE SYSTEM
1y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676076
METHOD, SYSTEM, AND USER TERMINAL FOR FLIGHT ROUTE SPLICING
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+6.4%)
2y 3m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 891 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month