Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 18/850,404

TERMINAL, BASE STATION AND COMMUNICATION METHOD

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Sep 24, 2024
Priority
Mar 30, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2022016352
Examiner
NGUYEN, BRIAN D
Art Unit
2475
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allowance Rate
1228 granted / 1327 resolved
+34.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
1349
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.9%
-32.1% vs TC avg
§103
30.4%
-9.6% vs TC avg
§102
23.9%
-16.1% vs TC avg
§112
23.7%
-16.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1327 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 1-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 1-4 are vague and indefinite because the use of terms “can”, “assume”, and “in a case”. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by He et al (2022/0312391). Regarding claims 1 and 4, He discloses a method and a terminal (see UE in figure 9) comprising: a communication unit configured to perform an uplink or downlink communication by using a frequency band in which aggregation is performed by carrier aggregation (see carrier aggregation (CA) in paragraph 0020); and a control unit configured to assume that, in a case where scheduling is performed in the aggregation-performed frequency band according to a unit including a plurality of component carriers, a maximum number of PDCCH candidates that can be monitored per slot in an active downlink BWP or of non-overlapped CCEs is determined based on sub-carrier spacings included in the plurality of component carriers (see the PDCCH monitoring capabilities may be enhanced to improve the scheduling flexibility for URLLC services. More specially, the maximum number of blind decoding attempts (or simply, blind decoding (BD)) and non-overlapped CCEs are specified per span, which results in a different number of BDs and non-overlapped CCEs over a slot for different span configurations. CCEs for PDCCH candidates are non-overlapped if they correspond to different CORESET indexes, or different first symbols for the reception of the respective PDCCH candidates in paragraphs 0019-0025; subcarrier spacing in paragraphs 0029, 0031-0032. See also paragraphs 0016, 0034-0037, 0039-0044). Regarding claim 2, He discloses wherein the control unit assumes that a maximum number of PDCCH candidates that can be monitored per slot in an active downlink BWP or of non-overlapped CCEs is determined based on whether or not the sub-carrier spacings included in the plurality of component carriers are equal to each other (see an active downlink (DL) bandwidth part (BWP) in paragraph 0016. See also paragraphs 0019-0022, 0034-0037). Regarding claim 3, claim 3 claims a base station (see figure 10) that is in communication with the terminal claimed in claim 1. Claim 3 is, therefore, subject to the same rejection. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRIAN D NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-3084. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00 - 4:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Khaled Kassim can be reached at 571-270-3770. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRIAN D NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2475
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 24, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12772267
DATA TRANSMISSION METHOD APPLIED TO SHORT-RANGE WIRELESS COMMUNICATION AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS
2y 8m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12762571
DIRECT ACCESS FOR CUSTOMER SERVICE WITH IMPERSONATION CAPABILITY
2y 9m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12764720
TRIGGER-BASED RANDOM ACCESS FOR WIRELESS DEVICE
2y 8m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12757105
COMMUNICATION METHOD AND COMMUNICATIONS APPARATUS
3y 0m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12756424
CLUSTERED COHERENT DISTRIBUTED SPATIAL MULTIPLEXING IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
2y 3m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+5.5%)
2y 3m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1327 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month