Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 18/850,624

POWER SUPPLY CONTROL DEVICE

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Sep 25, 2024
Priority
Mar 31, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2022016802
Examiner
KINGSLAND, KYLE J
Art Unit
3663
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Sumitomo Electric Industries Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
185 granted / 237 resolved
+26.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
261
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.7%
-32.3% vs TC avg
§103
46.0%
+6.0% vs TC avg
§102
24.4%
-15.6% vs TC avg
§112
19.9%
-20.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 237 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of the Claims This Office Action is in response to the amendments and/or arguments filed on April 29, 2026. Claims 1 and 5-6 are presently pending and are presented for examination. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments, see Pages 4-6, filed April 29, 2026, in regards to prior art rejections have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. It is noted that the applicant argues that Jung does not fully disclose of “a charging/discharging unit configured to perform a discharging operation for supplying power to the load based on power from the second battery, a regeneration operation for supplying power to the first battery based on power from the second battery, and a charging operation for supplying power to the second battery based on power from the first battery” and “determining a state of health of the second battery, based on both a value of a voltage of the second battery and a current value flowing through the second battery during at least one of the regeneration operation and the charging operation performed after the regeneration operation”, however the examiner respectfully disagrees. In regards to the arguments concerning “a charging/discharging unit configured to perform a discharging operation for supplying power to the load based on power from the second battery, a regeneration operation for supplying power to the first battery based on power from the second battery, and a charging operation for supplying power to the second battery based on power from the first battery”, Jung fully discloses of these limitations, where Para 0052 recites “The battery 400 supplies power to an electric device mounted in the vehicle, such as an electric control unit (ECU) and/or a driving motor (power source). The battery 400 may be charged by electricity produced by the solar panel 100. The battery 400 may include at least one of a first battery 410 and/or a second battery 420. In the present connection, the first battery 410 is a low voltage battery that supplies the accessory power or the start power, that is, a 12V battery, and the second battery 420 is a high voltage battery supplying power required for driving the driving motor.” Therefore it is noted that there is a second battery that can perform a discharging operation by supplying power to an electric device on the vehicle (a load), as well as be charged by a solar panel (a regeneration operation). Furthermore, Para 0055 recites “When the electricity is started to be produced from the solar panel 100, the solar controller 600 receives the corresponding electricity and performs an initialization operation. The solar controller 600 monitors output voltage of the solar panel 100 and activates a ready mode when the output voltage exceeds threshold voltage. The solar controller 600 identifies the start power state through the start system 200 in the ready mode. When the start power state is the start power OFF state (start OFF state), the solar controller 600 may wake up the battery management system 300 to perform battery charging. When the start power state is the start power ON state (start ON state), the solar controller 600 attempts to charge the battery when the output power of the solar panel 100 is 1 W or more. The solar controller 600 monitors states of charge of the first battery 410 and the second battery 420, and determines at least one of the first battery 410 and/or the second battery 420 as a charging target. The solar controller 600 compares the states of charge of the first battery 410 and the second battery 420 every predetermined period to determine the charging target. The solar controller 600 charges the determined charging target with the power produced from the solar panel 100”, where the solar controller can determine which battery to charge between the first battery and the second battery, where the state of charge of the two batteries are compared to one another in order to determine the target battery to be charged. This is further disclosed in Para 0069, where “When the SOC value of the first battery 410 (first battery SOC) exceeds the SOC value of the second battery 420 (second battery SOC) and the first battery SOC is equal to or less than a first reference SOC, the second processor 612 selects the first battery 410 as the charging target and activates a corresponding first battery charging mode. When the first battery SOC exceeds the second battery SOC and the first battery SOC exceeds the first reference SOC, the second processor 612 selects the second battery 420 as the charging target and activates a second battery charging mode. Furthermore, when the first battery SOC does not exceed the second battery SOC and the first battery SOC is less than a second reference SOC, the second processor 612 selects the first battery 410 as the charging target and activates the first battery charging mode. When the first battery SOC does not exceed the second battery SOC and the first battery SOC is equal to or greater than the second reference SOC, the second processor 612 selects the second battery 420 as the charging target and activates the second battery charging mode”, where the first battery is charged based on the SOC of the second battery (the regeneration operation), and power is supplied to the second battery based on the SOC of the first battery (the charging operation). This is additionally taught in Para 0087, where “When the first battery SOC exceeds the first reference SOC in S160, the solar controller 600 activates the second battery charging mode (S180). The second processor 612 selects the second battery 420 as the charging target, and controls the second converter 640 to start the charging operation of the second battery 420”. It is noted that arguments are made concerning the solar panel not being a battery, however it is noted that there is no requirement for the charging and regeneration power to come from a battery, therefore it is unclear how this detail is relevant to the current rejection. Therefore the claim limitations is fully disclosed. In regards to the arguments concerning “determining a state of health of the second battery, based on both a value of a voltage of the second battery and a current value flowing through the second battery during at least one of the regeneration operation and the charging operation performed after the regeneration operation”, Jung fully discloses of this limitations, where Para 0072 discloses of “When activating the second battery charging mode, the second processor 612 determines whether a second charger mounted in the vehicle is charging the second battery 420 and battery voltage of the second battery 420 exceeds reference voltage. In the present connection, the second charger may be an inverter, a regenerative brake system, or the like. When the second charger is charging the second battery 420 and the voltage of the second battery 420 exceeds the reference voltage (e.g., 309 V), the second processor 612 switches an operation mode of the solar controller 600 from the second battery charging mode to the first battery charging mode. When the second charger is not charging the second battery 420 and/or when the battery voltage of the second battery 420 is equal to or less than the reference voltage, the second processor 612 charges the second battery 420 with the output power of the solar panel 100.” It is noted that Jung discloses of determining if a second battery exceeds a reference voltage during a charging operation. The is additionally disclosed in Para 0098, where “Referring to FIG. 6, when activating the second battery charging mode, the solar controller 600 determines whether the second charger mounted in the vehicle is charging the second battery 420 and whether the battery voltage of the second battery 420 exceeds the reference voltage (S181). In the present connection, the second charger may be the inverter, the regenerative brake system, or the like.” Furthermore, Para 0051 discloses of “The battery management system 300 is configured to optimally manage the battery 400 to increase energy efficiency and extend a lifespan thereof. The battery management system 300 monitors voltage, current, temperature, and the like of the battery 400 in real time to prevent overcharge or overdischarge. The battery management system 300 may determine a residual amount of the battery 400, that is, a state of charge (SOC)”, where the battery system, which includes the second battery, monitors both the voltage and the current of the second battery, where the battery system is managed to avoid overcharge and overdischarge, where this can be reasonably interpreted as the state of health of the battery. It is noted that the charging of the second battery occurs after the charging of the first battery has been completed, as disclosed in Para 0087 where “When the first battery SOC exceeds the first reference SOC in S160, the solar controller 600 activates the second battery charging mode (S180). The second processor 612 selects the second battery 420 as the charging target, and controls the second converter 640 to start the charging operation of the second battery 420” and Para 0055 where “When the electricity is started to be produced from the solar panel 100, the solar controller 600 receives the corresponding electricity and performs an initialization operation. The solar controller 600 monitors output voltage of the solar panel 100 and activates a ready mode when the output voltage exceeds threshold voltage. The solar controller 600 identifies the start power state through the start system 200 in the ready mode. When the start power state is the start power OFF state (start OFF state), the solar controller 600 may wake up the battery management system 300 to perform battery charging. When the start power state is the start power ON state (start ON state), the solar controller 600 attempts to charge the battery when the output power of the solar panel 100 is 1 W or more. The solar controller 600 monitors states of charge of the first battery 410 and the second battery 420, and determines at least one of the first battery 410 and/or the second battery 420 as a charging target. The solar controller 600 compares the states of charge of the first battery 410 and the second battery 420 every predetermined period to determine the charging target. The solar controller 600 charges the determined charging target with the power produced from the solar panel 100”. It is noted that the charging can swap between the first battery and the second battery, where the SOC of the batteries every predetermined period of time to determine the appropriate charging target, where the charging operation is performed after the regenerative operation or when activating the charging operation (and therefore still during the regenerative operation that occurs beforehand). Therefore the claim limitations are fully disclosed and the rejection is upheld. A detailed rejection follows below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being Jung et al (US 20210078428; hereinafter Jung; already of record). In regards to claim 1, Jung discloses of a power supply control device to be installed in a vehicle and used in a power supply system including a first battery, a power path serving as a path for supplying power based on the first battery to a load, and a second battery configured to provide a backup power supply at least when power supply from the first battery is interrupted (“A solar charging system and method for a vehicle may include a battery mounted in the vehicle, a solar panel mounted on the vehicle to perform solar power generation, and a solar controller that receives electricity generated from the solar panel to operate, and controls charging of the battery using the electricity.” (Abstract), “The battery 400 supplies power to an electric device mounted in the vehicle, such as an electric control unit (ECU) and/or a driving motor (power source). The battery 400 may be charged by electricity produced by the solar panel 100. The battery 400 may include at least one of a first battery 410 and/or a second battery 420. In the present connection, the first battery 410 is a low voltage battery that supplies the accessory power or the start power, that is, a 12V battery, and the second battery 420 is a high voltage battery supplying power required for driving the driving motor.” (Para 0052), where the first battery is interrupted after starting the vehicle, where the second battery then is used for driving the vehicle), the power supply control device comprising: a charging/discharging unit configured to perform a discharging operation for supplying power to the load based on power from the second battery (“The battery 400 supplies power to an electric device mounted in the vehicle, such as an electric control unit (ECU) and/or a driving motor (power source). The battery 400 may be charged by electricity produced by the solar panel 100. The battery 400 may include at least one of a first battery 410 and/or a second battery 420. In the present connection, the first battery 410 is a low voltage battery that supplies the accessory power or the start power, that is, a 12V battery, and the second battery 420 is a high voltage battery supplying power required for driving the driving motor.” (Para 0052)), a regeneration operation for supplying power to the first battery based on power from the second battery (“When the electricity is started to be produced from the solar panel 100, the solar controller 600 receives the corresponding electricity and performs an initialization operation. The solar controller 600 monitors output voltage of the solar panel 100 and activates a ready mode when the output voltage exceeds threshold voltage. The solar controller 600 identifies the start power state through the start system 200 in the ready mode. When the start power state is the start power OFF state (start OFF state), the solar controller 600 may wake up the battery management system 300 to perform battery charging. When the start power state is the start power ON state (start ON state), the solar controller 600 attempts to charge the battery when the output power of the solar panel 100 is 1 W or more. The solar controller 600 monitors states of charge of the first battery 410 and the second battery 420, and determines at least one of the first battery 410 and/or the second battery 420 as a charging target. The solar controller 600 compares the states of charge of the first battery 410 and the second battery 420 every predetermined period to determine the charging target. The solar controller 600 charges the determined charging target with the power produced from the solar panel 100.” (Para 0055), “When the SOC value of the first battery 410 (first battery SOC) exceeds the SOC value of the second battery 420 (second battery SOC) and the first battery SOC is equal to or less than a first reference SOC, the second processor 612 selects the first battery 410 as the charging target and activates a corresponding first battery charging mode. When the first battery SOC exceeds the second battery SOC and the first battery SOC exceeds the first reference SOC, the second processor 612 selects the second battery 420 as the charging target and activates a second battery charging mode. Furthermore, when the first battery SOC does not exceed the second battery SOC and the first battery SOC is less than a second reference SOC, the second processor 612 selects the first battery 410 as the charging target and activates the first battery charging mode. When the first battery SOC does not exceed the second battery SOC and the first battery SOC is equal to or greater than the second reference SOC, the second processor 612 selects the second battery 420 as the charging target and activates the second battery charging mode.” (Para 0069)), and a charging operation for supplying power to the second battery based on power from the first battery (“When the first battery SOC exceeds the first reference SOC in S160, the solar controller 600 activates the second battery charging mode (S180). The second processor 612 selects the second battery 420 as the charging target, and controls the second converter 640 to start the charging operation of the second battery 420.” (Para 0087); In regards to the arguments concerning “a charging/discharging unit configured to perform a discharging operation for supplying power to the load based on power from the second battery, a regeneration operation for supplying power to the first battery based on power from the second battery, and a charging operation for supplying power to the second battery based on power from the first battery”, Jung fully discloses of these limitations, where Para 0052 recites “The battery 400 supplies power to an electric device mounted in the vehicle, such as an electric control unit (ECU) and/or a driving motor (power source). The battery 400 may be charged by electricity produced by the solar panel 100. The battery 400 may include at least one of a first battery 410 and/or a second battery 420. In the present connection, the first battery 410 is a low voltage battery that supplies the accessory power or the start power, that is, a 12V battery, and the second battery 420 is a high voltage battery supplying power required for driving the driving motor.” Therefore it is noted that there is a second battery that can perform a discharging operation by supplying power to an electric device on the vehicle (a load), as well as be charged by a solar panel (a regeneration operation). Furthermore, Para 0055 recites “When the electricity is started to be produced from the solar panel 100, the solar controller 600 receives the corresponding electricity and performs an initialization operation. The solar controller 600 monitors output voltage of the solar panel 100 and activates a ready mode when the output voltage exceeds threshold voltage. The solar controller 600 identifies the start power state through the start system 200 in the ready mode. When the start power state is the start power OFF state (start OFF state), the solar controller 600 may wake up the battery management system 300 to perform battery charging. When the start power state is the start power ON state (start ON state), the solar controller 600 attempts to charge the battery when the output power of the solar panel 100 is 1 W or more. The solar controller 600 monitors states of charge of the first battery 410 and the second battery 420, and determines at least one of the first battery 410 and/or the second battery 420 as a charging target. The solar controller 600 compares the states of charge of the first battery 410 and the second battery 420 every predetermined period to determine the charging target. The solar controller 600 charges the determined charging target with the power produced from the solar panel 100”, where the solar controller can determine which battery to charge between the first battery and the second battery, where the state of charge of the two batteries are compared to one another in order to determine the target battery to be charged. This is further disclosed in Para 0069, where “When the SOC value of the first battery 410 (first battery SOC) exceeds the SOC value of the second battery 420 (second battery SOC) and the first battery SOC is equal to or less than a first reference SOC, the second processor 612 selects the first battery 410 as the charging target and activates a corresponding first battery charging mode. When the first battery SOC exceeds the second battery SOC and the first battery SOC exceeds the first reference SOC, the second processor 612 selects the second battery 420 as the charging target and activates a second battery charging mode. Furthermore, when the first battery SOC does not exceed the second battery SOC and the first battery SOC is less than a second reference SOC, the second processor 612 selects the first battery 410 as the charging target and activates the first battery charging mode. When the first battery SOC does not exceed the second battery SOC and the first battery SOC is equal to or greater than the second reference SOC, the second processor 612 selects the second battery 420 as the charging target and activates the second battery charging mode”, where the first battery is charged based on the SOC of the second battery (the regeneration operation), and power is supplied to the second battery based on the SOC of the first battery (the charging operation). This is additionally taught in Para 0087, where “When the first battery SOC exceeds the first reference SOC in S160, the solar controller 600 activates the second battery charging mode (S180). The second processor 612 selects the second battery 420 as the charging target, and controls the second converter 640 to start the charging operation of the second battery 420”. It is noted that arguments are made concerning the solar panel not being a battery, however it is noted that there is no requirement for the charging and regeneration power to come from a battery, therefore it is unclear how this detail is relevant to the current rejection. Therefore the claim limitations is fully disclosed); and a control unit configured to control the charging/discharging unit (“When the electricity is started to be produced from the solar panel 100, the solar controller 600 receives the corresponding electricity and performs an initialization operation. The solar controller 600 monitors output voltage of the solar panel 100 and activates a ready mode when the output voltage exceeds threshold voltage. The solar controller 600 identifies the start power state through the start system 200 in the ready mode. When the start power state is the start power OFF state (start OFF state), the solar controller 600 may wake up the battery management system 300 to perform battery charging. When the start power state is the start power ON state (start ON state), the solar controller 600 attempts to charge the battery when the output power of the solar panel 100 is 1 W or more. The solar controller 600 monitors states of charge of the first battery 410 and the second battery 420, and determines at least one of the first battery 410 and/or the second battery 420 as a charging target. The solar controller 600 compares the states of charge of the first battery 410 and the second battery 420 every predetermined period to determine the charging target. The solar controller 600 charges the determined charging target with the power produced from the solar panel 100.” (Para 0055), the control unit controlling the charging/discharging unit to perform the regeneration operation when a start switch for starting the vehicle switches off, until a predetermined regeneration end condition is established, controlling the charging/discharging unit to perform the charging operation when the regeneration end condition is established ((“When the electricity is started to be produced from the solar panel 100, the solar controller 600 receives the corresponding electricity and performs an initialization operation. The solar controller 600 monitors output voltage of the solar panel 100 and activates a ready mode when the output voltage exceeds threshold voltage. The solar controller 600 identifies the start power state through the start system 200 in the ready mode. When the start power state is the start power OFF state (start OFF state), the solar controller 600 may wake up the battery management system 300 to perform battery charging. When the start power state is the start power ON state (start ON state), the solar controller 600 attempts to charge the battery when the output power of the solar panel 100 is 1 W or more. The solar controller 600 monitors states of charge of the first battery 410 and the second battery 420, and determines at least one of the first battery 410 and/or the second battery 420 as a charging target. The solar controller 600 compares the states of charge of the first battery 410 and the second battery 420 every predetermined period to determine the charging target. The solar controller 600 charges the determined charging target with the power produced from the solar panel 100.” (Para 0055), “The second processor 612 determines whether the start is activated (IGN ON) through the start system 200. When the start is deactivated (IGN OFF), the second processor 612 wakes up the battery management system 300. At the instant time, the battery management system 300 receives the driving power from the first battery 410 at the wake up.” (Para 0063), “When the SOC value of the first battery 410 (first battery SOC) exceeds the SOC value of the second battery 420 (second battery SOC) and the first battery SOC is equal to or less than a first reference SOC, the second processor 612 selects the first battery 410 as the charging target and activates a corresponding first battery charging mode. When the first battery SOC exceeds the second battery SOC and the first battery SOC exceeds the first reference SOC, the second processor 612 selects the second battery 420 as the charging target and activates a second battery charging mode. Furthermore, when the first battery SOC does not exceed the second battery SOC and the first battery SOC is less than a second reference SOC, the second processor 612 selects the first battery 410 as the charging target and activates the first battery charging mode. When the first battery SOC does not exceed the second battery SOC and the first battery SOC is equal to or greater than the second reference SOC, the second processor 612 selects the second battery 420 as the charging target and activates the second battery charging mode.” (Para 0069), “When the first battery SOC exceeds the first reference SOC in S160, the solar controller 600 activates the second battery charging mode (S180). The second processor 612 selects the second battery 420 as the charging target, and controls the second converter 640 to start the charging operation of the second battery 420.” (Para 0087)), and determining a state of health of the second battery, based on a value of a voltage of the second battery and a current value flowing through the second battery during at least one of the regeneration operation and the charging operation performed after the regeneration operation (“When activating the second battery charging mode, the second processor 612 determines whether a second charger mounted in the vehicle is charging the second battery 420 and battery voltage of the second battery 420 exceeds reference voltage. In the present connection, the second charger may be an inverter, a regenerative brake system, or the like. When the second charger is charging the second battery 420 and the voltage of the second battery 420 exceeds the reference voltage (e.g., 309 V), the second processor 612 switches an operation mode of the solar controller 600 from the second battery charging mode to the first battery charging mode. When the second charger is not charging the second battery 420 and/or when the battery voltage of the second battery 420 is equal to or less than the reference voltage, the second processor 612 charges the second battery 420 with the output power of the solar panel 100.” (Para 0072), “Referring to FIG. 6, when activating the second battery charging mode, the solar controller 600 determines whether the second charger mounted in the vehicle is charging the second battery 420 and whether the battery voltage of the second battery 420 exceeds the reference voltage (S181). In the present connection, the second charger may be the inverter, the regenerative brake system, or the like.” (Para 0098), “The battery management system 300 is configured to optimally manage the battery 400 to increase energy efficiency and extend a lifespan thereof. The battery management system 300 monitors voltage, current, temperature, and the like of the battery 400 in real time to prevent overcharge or overdischarge. The battery management system 300 may determine a residual amount of the battery 400, that is, a state of charge (SOC).” (Para 0051), see also Para 0078); In regards to the arguments concerning “determining a state of health of the second battery, based on both a value of a voltage of the second battery and a current value flowing through the second battery during at least one of the regeneration operation and the charging operation performed after the regeneration operation”, Jung fully discloses of this limitations, where Para 0072 discloses of “When activating the second battery charging mode, the second processor 612 determines whether a second charger mounted in the vehicle is charging the second battery 420 and battery voltage of the second battery 420 exceeds reference voltage. In the present connection, the second charger may be an inverter, a regenerative brake system, or the like. When the second charger is charging the second battery 420 and the voltage of the second battery 420 exceeds the reference voltage (e.g., 309 V), the second processor 612 switches an operation mode of the solar controller 600 from the second battery charging mode to the first battery charging mode. When the second charger is not charging the second battery 420 and/or when the battery voltage of the second battery 420 is equal to or less than the reference voltage, the second processor 612 charges the second battery 420 with the output power of the solar panel 100.” It is noted that Jung discloses of determining if a second battery exceeds a reference voltage during a charging operation. The is additionally disclosed in Para 0098, where “Referring to FIG. 6, when activating the second battery charging mode, the solar controller 600 determines whether the second charger mounted in the vehicle is charging the second battery 420 and whether the battery voltage of the second battery 420 exceeds the reference voltage (S181). In the present connection, the second charger may be the inverter, the regenerative brake system, or the like.” Furthermore, Para 0051 discloses of “The battery management system 300 is configured to optimally manage the battery 400 to increase energy efficiency and extend a lifespan thereof. The battery management system 300 monitors voltage, current, temperature, and the like of the battery 400 in real time to prevent overcharge or overdischarge. The battery management system 300 may determine a residual amount of the battery 400, that is, a state of charge (SOC)”, where the battery system, which includes the second battery, monitors both the voltage and the current of the second battery, where the battery system is managed to avoid overcharge and overdischarge, where this can be reasonably interpreted as the state of health of the battery. It is noted that the charging of the second battery occurs after the charging of the first battery has been completed, as disclosed in Para 0087 where “When the first battery SOC exceeds the first reference SOC in S160, the solar controller 600 activates the second battery charging mode (S180). The second processor 612 selects the second battery 420 as the charging target, and controls the second converter 640 to start the charging operation of the second battery 420” and Para 0055 where “When the electricity is started to be produced from the solar panel 100, the solar controller 600 receives the corresponding electricity and performs an initialization operation. The solar controller 600 monitors output voltage of the solar panel 100 and activates a ready mode when the output voltage exceeds threshold voltage. The solar controller 600 identifies the start power state through the start system 200 in the ready mode. When the start power state is the start power OFF state (start OFF state), the solar controller 600 may wake up the battery management system 300 to perform battery charging. When the start power state is the start power ON state (start ON state), the solar controller 600 attempts to charge the battery when the output power of the solar panel 100 is 1 W or more. The solar controller 600 monitors states of charge of the first battery 410 and the second battery 420, and determines at least one of the first battery 410 and/or the second battery 420 as a charging target. The solar controller 600 compares the states of charge of the first battery 410 and the second battery 420 every predetermined period to determine the charging target. The solar controller 600 charges the determined charging target with the power produced from the solar panel 100”. It is noted that the charging can swap between the first battery and the second battery, where the SOC of the batteries every predetermined period of time to determine the appropriate charging target, where the charging operation is performed after the regenerative operation or when activating the charging operation (and therefore still during the regenerative operation that occurs beforehand). Therefore the claim limitations are fully disclosed). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 5-6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jung in view of Miura (JP 2012147529; already of record from IDS). In regards to claim 5, Jung discloses of the power supply control device according to claim 1, wherein the control unit controls the charging/discharging unit to perform the regeneration operation … and determines the state of health of the second battery, based on the value of the voltage of the second battery and the value of the current flowing through the second battery during the regeneration operation (“When activating the second battery charging mode, the second processor 612 determines whether a second charger mounted in the vehicle is charging the second battery 420 and battery voltage of the second battery 420 exceeds reference voltage. In the present connection, the second charger may be an inverter, a regenerative brake system, or the like. When the second charger is charging the second battery 420 and the voltage of the second battery 420 exceeds the reference voltage (e.g., 309 V), the second processor 612 switches an operation mode of the solar controller 600 from the second battery charging mode to the first battery charging mode. When the second charger is not charging the second battery 420 and/or when the battery voltage of the second battery 420 is equal to or less than the reference voltage, the second processor 612 charges the second battery 420 with the output power of the solar panel 100.” (Para 0072), “Referring to FIG. 6, when activating the second battery charging mode, the solar controller 600 determines whether the second charger mounted in the vehicle is charging the second battery 420 and whether the battery voltage of the second battery 420 exceeds the reference voltage (S181). In the present connection, the second charger may be the inverter, the regenerative brake system, or the like.” (Para 0098), “The battery management system 300 is configured to optimally manage the battery 400 to increase energy efficiency and extend a lifespan thereof. The battery management system 300 monitors voltage, current, temperature, and the like of the battery 400 in real time to prevent overcharge or overdischarge. The battery management system 300 may determine a residual amount of the battery 400, that is, a state of charge (SOC).” (Para 0051), see also Para 0078 and 0055). However, Jung does not specifically disclose of such that a discharge current from the charging/discharging unit is constant. Miura, in the same field of endeavor, teaches of such that a discharge current from the charging/discharging unit is constant (“On the other hand, when the charged amount is not the lower limit charged amount or less (SB3, No), the discharge control unit 64b discharges from the battery 55 and supplies the discharged power to each load 40 (SB4). This charging is performed by a known method such as constant current discharge or constant voltage discharge, and a known overdischarge prevention method for preventing overdischarge is applied as necessary.” (Para 0049), see also Para 0051). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the charging/discharging unit, as taught by Jung, to include having a constant current discharge, as taught by Miura, with a reasonable expectation of success in order to prevent overdischarging (Miura Para 0049). In regards to claim 6, Jung discloses of the power supply control device according to claim 1, wherein the control unit controls the charging/discharging unit to perform the charging operation … and determines the state of health of the second battery, based on the value of the voltage of the second battery and the value of the current flowing through the second battery during the charging operation. (“When activating the second battery charging mode, the second processor 612 determines whether a second charger mounted in the vehicle is charging the second battery 420 and battery voltage of the second battery 420 exceeds reference voltage. In the present connection, the second charger may be an inverter, a regenerative brake system, or the like. When the second charger is charging the second battery 420 and the voltage of the second battery 420 exceeds the reference voltage (e.g., 309 V), the second processor 612 switches an operation mode of the solar controller 600 from the second battery charging mode to the first battery charging mode. When the second charger is not charging the second battery 420 and/or when the battery voltage of the second battery 420 is equal to or less than the reference voltage, the second processor 612 charges the second battery 420 with the output power of the solar panel 100.” (Para 0072), “Referring to FIG. 6, when activating the second battery charging mode, the solar controller 600 determines whether the second charger mounted in the vehicle is charging the second battery 420 and whether the battery voltage of the second battery 420 exceeds the reference voltage (S181). In the present connection, the second charger may be the inverter, the regenerative brake system, or the like.” (Para 0098), “The battery management system 300 is configured to optimally manage the battery 400 to increase energy efficiency and extend a lifespan thereof. The battery management system 300 monitors voltage, current, temperature, and the like of the battery 400 in real time to prevent overcharge or overdischarge. The battery management system 300 may determine a residual amount of the battery 400, that is, a state of charge (SOC).” (Para 0051), see also Para 0078 and 0055). However, Jung does not specifically disclose of such that a charge current from the charging/discharging unit is constant. Miura, in the same field of endeavor, teaches of such that a charge current from the charging/discharging unit is constant (“On the other hand, when the charged amount is not the upper limit charged amount or more (SA3, No), the charge control unit 64a charges the battery 55 (SA4). This charging is performed by a known method such as constant current charging or constant voltage charging, and a known overcharge preventing method for preventing overcharging is applied as necessary.” (Para 0042), see also Para 0044). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the charging/discharging unit, as taught by Jung, to include having a constant current charge, as taught by Miura, with a reasonable expectation of success in order to prevent overcharging (Miura Para 0042). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Kyle J Kingsland whose telephone number is (571)272-3268. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday from 8:00-4:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Abby Flynn can be reached at (571) 272-9855. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KYLE J KINGSLAND/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3663
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 25, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Apr 29, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 04, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jul 28, 2026
Interview Requested
Aug 10, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Aug 10, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12685261
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION MACHINE WITH DRIVER ASSISTANCE SYSTEM
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12679222
BATTERY ELECTRIC VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673582
PRECONDITIONER SYSTEM FOR A BATTERY OF A VEHICLE AND METHOD
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12673558
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING MOTOR-BASED TORQUE VECTORING
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12661999
COMPUTER SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING TORQUE PROVIDED BY A MOTOR
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+7.2%)
2y 9m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 237 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month