Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/851,557

PERMANENT MAGNET SYNCHRONOUS ELECTRIC MOTOR

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Sep 26, 2024
Priority
Jul 14, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2022027691
Examiner
NGUYEN, VIET P
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
61%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 61% of resolved cases
61%
Career Allowance Rate
441 granted / 719 resolved
+1.3% vs TC avg
Strong +31% interview lift
Without
With
+30.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
736
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
83.5%
+43.5% vs TC avg
§102
4.7%
-35.3% vs TC avg
§112
10.9%
-29.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 719 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2, 4, and 10-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by EP 3883093 A1 to Kawamoto. Regarding claim 1, Kawamoto discloses a motor comprising: a stator [0010]; a rotor (Fig. 1: 10) rotatably disposed with respect to the stator, and including a rotor core (21) that is constituted by an electrical steel sheet [0015] and includes one or more protruding portions (Fig. 9: 61) protruding in a radial direction toward the stator, and a rotating shaft (101) that is fixed to the rotor core; and a plurality of permanent magnets (31) aligned in a circumferential direction of the rotor, each of which includes an arc-shaped stator-facing surface (outer arc surface of 21) facing the stator with a gap therebetween, a rotor-core-fixing surface (inner surface of 31) positioned on a side opposite to the stator-facing surface and fixed to an outer circumferential surface of the rotor core (21), and a recessed portion (62) connected to a part of the rotor-core-fixing surface and into which the protruding portion (61) is fitted, wherein polarities of the stator-facing surfaces of two permanent magnets adjacent to each other in the circumferential direction among the plurality of permanent magnets are different from each other (inherent N-S polarities in permanent magnet generators), in the circumferential direction, each of the plurality of permanent magnets has a first magnet end (Fig. 8: 46) connected to the rotor-core-fixing surface, and a second magnet end (45) connected to the rotor-core-fixing surface and positioned on a side opposite to the first magnet end, in the circumferential direction, the recessed portion of each of the plurality of permanent magnets has a first recessed-portion end connected to the rotor-core-fixing surface, and a second recessed-portion end connected to the rotor-core-fixing surface and positioned on a side opposite to the first recessed-portion end (Fig. 8 shows a protruding portion 33, however, Fig. 9 shows that 33 can be recessed. The two recessed-portion ends would be the left and right side of 33), the rotor-core-fixing surface has a first region (right of 33, shown at 41) positioned between the first magnet end and the first recessed- portion end, and a second region (left of 33) positioned between the second magnet end and the second recessed-portion end, the recessed portion (33) is positioned between the first region and the second region, and L1 ≠ L2 is satisfied provided that a distance between the first magnet end and the first recessed-portion end in the first region is L1, and a distance between the second magnet end and the second recessed-portion end in the second region is L2 (right side is larger than left side). Regarding claim 2, Kawamoto discloses the plurality of permanent magnets include a first magnet group (Figs. 5-6: 36A) and a second magnet group (36J) adjacent to each other in an axial direction in which the rotating shaft extends (vertical axis), each of the plurality of permanent magnets constituting the first magnet group is a first permanent magnet (36A), each of the plurality of permanent magnets constituting the second magnet group is a second permanent magnet (36J), a skew angle is referred to as θ [0017], the first permanent magnet is displaced by θ/2 with respect to a d-axis of the permanent magnet synchronous electric motor in a counterclockwise direction in the circumferential direction (skew towards L3), the second permanent magnet is displaced by θ/2 with respect to the d-axis of the permanent magnet synchronous electric motor in a clockwise direction in the circumferential direction (skew towards L4), a magnet center line (Fig. 8: located at 44) extending radially outward from an axial center of the rotating shaft and passing through a circumferential center point of each of the plurality of permanent magnets intersects the first region, and L1 ≠ L2 is satisfied and L1 > L2 is satisfied (right of 33 is greater than left of 33). Regarding claim 4, Kawamoto discloses a surface forming a bottom of the recessed portion has an arc shape [0057]. Regarding claim 10, Kawamoto discloses the rotor includes a first rotor portion, and a second rotor portion adjacent to the first rotor portion in an axial direction in which the rotating shaft extends, the plurality of permanent magnets include a first magnet group disposed in the first rotor portion, and a second magnet group disposed in the second rotor portion, each of the plurality of permanent magnets constituting the first magnet group is a first permanent magnet, each of the plurality of permanent magnets constituting the second magnet group is a second permanent magnet, a circumferential center position of the stator-facing surface of the first permanent magnet and a circumferential center position of the stator-facing surface of the second permanent magnet coincide with each other in the axial direction, the protruding portion of the rotor core has a first protruding portion disposed in the first rotor portion, and a second protruding portion disposed in the second rotor portion, the first protruding portion is fitted into the recessed portion of the first permanent magnet, the second protruding portion is fitted into the recessed portion of the second permanent magnet, and the second protruding portion is displaced at a skew angle with respect to the first protruding portion in the circumferential direction (Fig. 6: 133 of 36A is skewed from 133 of 36J). Regarding claim 11, Kawamoto discloses the rotor includes a first rotor portion, and a second rotor portion adjacent to the first rotor portion in an axial direction in which the rotating shaft extends, the plurality of permanent magnets include a first magnet group disposed in the first rotor portion, and a second magnet group disposed in the second rotor portion, each of the plurality of permanent magnets constituting the first magnet group is a first permanent magnet, each of the plurality of permanent magnets constituting the second magnet group is a second permanent magnet, a circumferential center position of the stator-facing surface of the first permanent magnet and a circumferential center position of the stator-facing surface of the second permanent magnet do not coincide with each other in the axial direction, the protruding portion of the rotor core extends continuously from the first rotor portion to the second rotor portion, the protruding portion is fitted into the recessed portion of the first permanent magnet and the recessed portion of the second permanent magnet, and a circumferential center position of the stator-facing surface of the first permanent magnet is displaced at a skew angle with respect to a circumferential center position of the stator- facing surface of the second permanent magnet in the circumferential direction (Fig. 5: the circumferential center position is the center line that runs parallel to sides 45 and 46. It can be seen that lines 45 and 46 skews from magnets 36A to 36J). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 3 and 6-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over EP 3883093 A1 to Kawamoto in view of WO 2022113181 A1 to Motoyoshi et al. Regarding claims 6-7, Kawamoto discloses a motor as described above. However, it fails to disclose the limitations from claims 6-7. Motoyoshi et al. teaches: the recessed portion has a first bottom end forming a bottom of the recessed portion, a second bottom end forming the bottom of the recessed portion and spaced apart from the first bottom end, a first inner wall formed between the first recessed-portion end and the first bottom end and extending in the radial direction, and a second inner wall formed between the second recessed-portion end and the second bottom end, and wherein the second inner wall has a vertical surface connected to the second recessed-portion end and extending in the radial direction, and an inclined surface connected to the vertical surface and the second bottom end and extending linearly to be inclined with respect to the vertical surface (Fig. 26: inclined surface 252a). the recessed portion has a first bottom end forming a bottom of the recessed portion, a second bottom end forming the bottom of the recessed portion and spaced apart from the first bottom end, a first inner wall formed between the first recessed-portion end and the first bottom end and extending in the radial direction, and a second inner wall formed between the second recessed-portion end and the second bottom end, and wherein the second inner wall has a curved surface connected to the second bottom end (Fig. 24: curved surface 252a). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use the teaching of the inclined/curved surfaces as disclosed by Motoyoshi et al. to the motor disclosed by Kawamoto. One would have been motivated to do so to curb the degradation of torque characteristics due to irreversible demagnetization. Regarding claims 3 and 8-9, Kawamoto discloses a motor as described above. However, it fails to disclose the limitations from claims 3 and 8-9. Motoyoshi et al. teaches: the recessed portion has a first bottom end forming a bottom of the recessed portion, and a second bottom end forming the bottom of the recessed portion and spaced apart from the first bottom end, and H1 ≠ H2 is satisfied provided that a distance between the first recessed-portion end and the first bottom end in the radial direction is H1 and a distance between the second recessed- portion end and the second bottom end in the radial direction is H2 (Figs. 24 and 26: protrusion 242a have different heights on left and right side). the recessed portion has a first inner wall formed between the first recessed-portion end and the first bottom end and extending in the radial direction, and a second inner wall formed between the second recessed-portion end and the second bottom end, and the second inner wall has a vertical surface connected to the second recessed-portion end and extending in the radial direction, and an inclined surface connected to the vertical surface and the second bottom end and extending linearly to be inclined with respect to the vertical surface (Fig. 26: inclined surface 252a). the recessed portion has a first inner wall formed between the first recessed-portion end and the first bottom end and extending in the radial direction, and a second inner wall formed between the second recessed-portion end and the second bottom end, and wherein the second inner wall has a curved surface connected to the second bottom end (Fig. 24: curved surface 252a). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use the teaching of the inclined/curved surfaces as disclosed by Motoyoshi et al. to the motor disclosed by Kawamoto. One would have been motivated to do so to curb the degradation of torque characteristics due to irreversible demagnetization. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 5 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VIET P NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-9457. The examiner can normally be reached M, T, Th, F from 12pm-8pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Tulsidas C Patel can be reached at 571-272-2098. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VIET P NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 26, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12665532
MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL FOR ELECTRICAL MACHINES WITH MULTIPLE SETS OF WINDINGS
1y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12640609
MOTOR HAVING ROTOR-INTEGRATED COOLANT PASSAGE AND END-PLATE- FORMED COOLANT CAVITY
2y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12640627
HEAT DISSIPATION DEVICE FOR OUTER ROTOR MOTOR
1y 10m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12638000
WATER TURBINE SYSTEM AND METHOD OF USE
1y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12633789
ROTOR FOR REDUCING EDDY CURRENT LOSS
2y 5m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
61%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+30.6%)
2y 4m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 719 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month