Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 18/851,585

FULL COVER/FINE LINES SPRAY APPLICATION

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Sep 26, 2024
Priority
Mar 30, 2022 — provisional 63/325,351 +1 more
Examiner
GREENLUND, JOSEPH A
Art Unit
3752
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Nordson Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
433 granted / 648 resolved
-3.2% vs TC avg
Strong +34% interview lift
Without
With
+34.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
693
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
47.5%
+7.5% vs TC avg
§102
25.6%
-14.4% vs TC avg
§112
24.2%
-15.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 648 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims Currently claims 1-6, 8-13, 16-21, and 23-24 are pending, claims 7, 14-15, 22, and 25 are cancelled, and claims 3-4, 6, 8-11, 13, 21, and 23 are amended. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3 and 8-13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Burmester (U.S. 2009/0258138). With respect to claim 1, Burmester discloses a nozzle for dispensing a pattern of liquid adhesive filaments (abstract), comprising: a first air shim plate (50) that has one or more air slots (figure 3, #100) that are configured to receive and direct pressurized air (paragraph 0010); and an adhesive shim plate (54) that has at least two liquid slots (slots 136) configured to receive pressurized liquid adhesive and discharge liquid adhesive filaments (paragraph 0010 and abstract), the pressurized air directed by the one or more air slots guides the filaments (being the effect of the air on the filaments, paragraph 0007), of the pressurized liquid adhesive discharging from the at least two liquid slots, in a pattern (abstract, paragraphs 0001 and 0066), wherein the one or more air slots of the first air shim plate are configured to direct the pressurized air along a first angle (abstract) relative to the adhesive shim plate (abstract), such that when the at least two liquid slots discharge the liquid adhesive filaments (abstract and paragraph 0010), one of the one or more air slots is configured to direct the pressurized air to the liquid adhesive filaments discharged by the at least two liquid slots (paragraphs 0010-0011). With respect to claim 2, Burmester discloses the one or more air slots of the first air shim plate are configured to direct the pressurized air to guide the filaments of the pressurized liquid adhesive discharging from the liquid slots in the pattern (paragraphs 0010-0011 and 0016). With respect to claim 3, Burmester discloses the pattern is predetermined (the pattern being predetermined to be random and predetermined to have well-defined cut-off and cut-on edges, paragraph 0066, whereby choosing the pattern to be a random pattern is in itself a predetermination of what the pattern will be by having defined edges). With respect to claim 8, Burmester discloses a separating shim plate (52) positioned between the first air shim plate and the adhesive shim plate (See figure 2). With respect to claim 9, Burmester discloses the at least two liquid slots are configured to discharge the liquid adhesive filaments parallel to one another (paragraphs 0003 and 0014). With respect to claim 10, Burmester discloses the at least two liquid slots are at least five liquid slots (see figure 3) that are configured to receive the pressurized liquid adhesive and discharge the liquid adhesive filaments (paragraphs 0010-0011), and wherein the one of the one or more air slots is configured to direct the pressurized air to the liquid adhesive filaments that are discharged by the at least five liquid slots (see figure 5). With respect to claim 11, Burmester discloses a second air shim plate (80), wherein the second air shim plate has one or more air slots that are configured to receive and direct pressurized air (figure 2), paragraph , wherein the one or more air slots of the second air shim plate are configured to direct the pressurized air along a second angle relative to the adhesive shim plate (as shown in figures 7 and 8), the first angle being different than the second angle so that the first and second air shim plates direct the pressurized air asymmetrically toward the adhesive filaments (as shown in figures 7 and 8), and wherein the adhesive shim plate is positioned between the first and second air shim plates (as shown in figure 2). With respect to claim 12, Burmester discloses the first angle is 0° and the second angle is anywhere from 40° to 90° (see figure 8a, where there is no angle between 50 and 54, and 80 is shown between 40 and 90 degrees, paragraphs 0059). With respect to claim 13, Burmester discloses a nozzle body (12), the first and second air shim plates and the adhesive shim plate being coupled to the nozzle body (see figures 1 and 2); a first end plate secured to the first surface of the nozzle body (14), the first air shim plate and the adhesive shim plate being positioned between the first end plate and the nozzle body (as shown in figure 2); and a second end plate secured to the second surface of the nozzle body (end plate 16), the second air shim plate being positioned between the second end plate and the nozzle body (see figure 2), wherein the at least two liquid slots are at least five liquid slots that are configured to receive the pressurized liquid adhesive and discharge the liquid adhesive filaments (see figure 5), wherein the one of the one or more air slots of each of the first air shim plate and the second air shim plate are configured to direct the pressurized air to the liquid adhesive filaments that are discharged by the at least five liquid slots (paragraphs 0010-0011), and wherein each of the liquid slots is arranged between the one of the one or more air slots of each of the first air shim plate and the second air shim plate (see figures 2-8). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 4-6, 16-21, and 23-24 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Burmester in view of Vinnay (U.S. 2010/0224665). With respect to claims 4-5 and 16-18 Burmester discloses each of the one or more air slots of the first air shim plate have a respective air outlet that defines a width, but fails to disclose that the width is anywhere from greater than 1mm, 1 mm to 10 mm, or 1 to 2.5mm, . Vinny, paragraph 0090, discloses changing size (width) the pneumatic (air) orifice to vary the desired liquid spray configuration. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to utilize the air outlet to be greater than 1mm, 1-10mm, or 1-2.5mm in Burmester since doing so would have a desired spray configured of the filament, since it has been held that where the general conditions of a claim are disclosed I the prior art, discovering the optimum or workable ranges involves only routine skill in the art. MPEP 2144.05(II-A). Changing the width to a desired width (such as 1mm) would result in a desired liquid spray configuration. With respect to cla5. (Original) The nozzle of claim 4, wherein each width of the respective air outlet is anywhere from 1 mm to 2.5 mm. With respect to claim 6 and 19-20, Burmester discloses each one of the at least two liquid slots has a respective liquid outlet that defines a width, but fails to disclose that the width is anywhere from .1 mm to 2mm or .1-1mm. Vinny, paragraph 0090, discloses changing size (width) the liquid orifice to vary the desired liquid spray configuration, to increase the spray size the width can be increased. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to utilize the desired width of the liquid outlet between .1mm and .2mm or .1-1mm in Burmester since doing so would have a desired spray configured of the filament, since it has been held that where the general conditions of a claim are disclosed I the prior art, discovering the optimum or workable ranges involves only routine skill in the art. MPEP 2144.05(II-A). Changing the width to a desired width (such as .1mm-.2mm or .1-1mm) would result in a desired liquid spray configuration. With respect to claim 21, Burmester discloses the at least one liquid slot is a single liquid slot (see figure 2, taking only one slot) and the at least one liquid adhesive filament is a single adhesive filament, or wherein the one or more air slots are three or more air slots (see figures 2-3). With respect to claim 123, Burmester discloses a second air shim plate (80), wherein the second air shim plate has one or more air slots that are configured to receive and direct pressurized air (figure 2), paragraph , wherein the one or more air slots of the second air shim plate are configured to direct the pressurized air along a second angle relative to the adhesive shim plate (as shown in figures 7 and 8), the first angle being different than the second angle so that the first and second air shim plates direct the pressurized air asymmetrically toward the adhesive filaments (as shown in figures 7 and 8), and wherein the adhesive shim plate is positioned between the first and second air shim plates (as shown in figure 2). With respect to claim 24, Burmester discloses the first angle is 0° and the second angle is anywhere from 40° to 90° (see figure 8a, where there is no angle between 50 and 54, and 80 is shown between 40 and 90 degrees, paragraphs 0059). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSEPH A GREENLUND whose telephone number is (571)272-0397. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-5pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Arthur Hall can be reached at 571-270-1814. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOSEPH A GREENLUND/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3752
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 26, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12698996
PRODUCT DISTRIBUTION DEVICE WITH SECTION CONTROL MONITORING
4y 4m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12691317
SPRINKLER FRAME SUPPORT BRIDGE
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12686027
ROTARY SPRINKLER HEAD AND SPRAYING DEVICE
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12678810
SPRAY IONIZATION DEVICE
3y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674584
HIGH TECH STOVE FIRE DETECTOR AND SUPPRESSION SYSTEM
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+34.5%)
2y 9m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 648 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month