Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/852,018

FILTER ELEMENTS AND ASSEMBLIES

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Sep 27, 2024
Priority
Mar 28, 2022 — EU 22164878.5 +1 more
Examiner
PREGLER, SHARON
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Donaldson Company, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
701 granted / 899 resolved
+18.0% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
922
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
50.0%
+10.0% vs TC avg
§102
17.8%
-22.2% vs TC avg
§112
21.6%
-18.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 899 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: “filter element comprising” in line 11 should be changed to “the filter element comprising.” Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 12, 14 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 12, the phrase “said protrusion” lacks antecedent basis. It’s parent claim 10 recites “first and second protrusions” thus it is unclear if said protrusion is meant to be both or either. Regarding claim 14, the phrase “said shell” lacks antecedent basis. Claim 14 depends on claim 10, which does not recite a shell. Claim 13 recites “a shell structure” but it is not explicitly clear that the said shell in claim 14 is mapped to the shell structure in claim 13. Regarding claim 15, the phrase “second rotation direction” in line 7 is indefinite because there is no definition of a “first rotation direction” in the claim or its parent claim 1. Therefore, it is unclear which rotation direction is intended to be blocked by the locking structure. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-15 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The closest prior art is Dewit US 8,920,528 who teaches an air cleaner having a housing 302, access opening 312, removable cover 314, and a removable filter cartridge 320 positioned between the inlet and outlets. The housing includes opposing receiving grooves 318, 319, each having a straight wall 442, a curved bight 444, and a sloped wall 446. Opposing lugs 334, 335 of the filter assembly are received within the grooves and rest in the bight allowing the filter to rock about the lugs into sealing engagement within the housing. PNG media_image1.png 520 753 media_image1.png Greyscale However, Dewit does not explicitly teach or suggest the L-shaped protrusions required by claims 1, 10 and 15. Further, Dewit does not teach or fairly suggest protrusions having first and second legs joined by an elbow portion where the elbow portion serves as the pivot point. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHARON PREGLER whose telephone number is (571)270-5051. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 9am - 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, In Suk Bullock can be reached at (571) 272-5954. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHARON PREGLER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1772
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 27, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12723806
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR REMOVING NATURAL GAS LIQUIDS FROM RICH GAS
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12714958
COMPOSITE FOR AIR PURIFICATION, METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME, AND FILTER INCLUDING THE SAME
3y 8m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12702947
MULTI-STAGE DIRECT CAPTURE OF CO2 FROM AIR
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12702965
CARBON SORBENT-AZOBENZENE HYBRIDS FOR CARBON CAPTURE AND METHODS OF PRODUCING AND/OR USING SAID HYBRIDS
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12691402
A METHOD FOR REMOVING CO2 FROM A CO2-CONTAINING STREAM
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+21.1%)
2y 7m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 899 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month