Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/852,143

ANTENNA DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 27, 2024
Examiner
MUNOZ, DANIEL
Art Unit
2896
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Yokowo Co., LTD.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allow Rate
407 granted / 542 resolved
+7.1% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+22.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
558
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
48.9%
+8.9% vs TC avg
§102
29.5%
-10.5% vs TC avg
§112
12.9%
-27.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 542 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement(s) (IDS) is/are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement(s) is/are being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Hara et al. (U.S. Patent Application No. 20240047897), hereinafter known as Hara. Regarding claim 1, Hara discloses (Figs. 1-33) an antenna housing (101) in which a hollow portion being formed (see Fig. 1); an antenna (103, 104, or 105) located inside the antenna housing and configured to perform at least one of transmission and reception of electric waves ([0057]-[0064]); and a scatterer (111-113, screwing portions, [0124]) configured to scatter the electric waves propagating through the hollow portion at a predetermined position of the antenna housing ([0066]). Regarding claim 2, Hara further discloses (Figs. 1-33) wherein at least one scatterer is present in a position where a ripple of directional characteristics of the electric waves is smaller than in other positions (see Figs. 2-3, Examiner’s Note: the Examiner has reason to believe that “wherein at least one scatterer is present in a position where a ripple of directional characteristics of the electric waves is smaller than in other positions”; therefore, this limitation, which refers entirely to a property or function of the explicitly recited structure of 2, which structure, as described herein, reads on the scatterer of Hara, is presumed inherent to the scatterer of Hara, as permitted by the legal principles outlined in MPEP 2112.01(I); for further information see also In Re Schreiber, 44 USPQ2d 1429 (CAFC 1997), which states that: "A patent applicant is free to recite features of an apparatus either structurally or functionally. . . . Yet, choosing to define an element functionally, i.e., by what it does, carries with it a risk . . . As our predecessor court stated in Swinehart, 439 F.2d at 213, 169 USPQ at 228: where the Patent Office has reason to believe that a functional limitation asserted to be critical for establishing novelty in the claimed subject matter may, in fact, be an inherent characteristic of the prior art, it possesses the authority to require the applicant to prove that the subject matter shown to be in the prior art does not possess the characteristic relied on.”). Regarding claim 3, Hara discloses (Figs. 1-33) wherein the number of the scatterer is two or more (see Figs. 2-3), at least one first scatterer is located at the predetermined position in the antenna housing, and at least one second scatterer is located at a position where a deviation of an intensity distribution of the electric waves in the vicinity of the predetermined position is relatively small (see Figs. 2-3, Examiner’s Note in response to claim 2). Regarding claim 4, Hara discloses (Figs. 1-33) wherein the number of the scatterer is two or more (see Figs. 2-3), at least one first scatterer is located at the predetermined position in the antenna housing, and at least one second scatterer is located at a position where a ripple of directional characteristics is relatively small (see Figs. 2-3, Examiner’s Note in response to claim 2). Regarding claim 5, Hara discloses (Figs. 1-33) wherein two or more scatterers are present at positions substantially symmetrical with respect to an axis connecting a feed point of the antenna and a geometric center of the antenna housing (see Figs. 2-3, antennas aligned with center axis of housing). Regarding claim 6, Hara discloses (Figs. 1-33) wherein the scatterer is present on an axis connecting a feed point of the antenna and a geometric center of the antenna housing (see Figs. 2-3, antennas and one of 111-113 aligned with center axis of housing). Regarding claim 7, Hara discloses (Figs. 1-33) wherein the scatterer is configured with an ungrounded conductive component ([0068]). Regarding claim 8, Hara discloses (Figs. 1-33) wherein the scatterer is configured with a grounded conductive component ([0135]). Regarding claim 9, Hara discloses (Figs. 1-33) wherein the scatterer is configured with a non-conductive component ([0059], resin). Regarding claim 10, Hara discloses (Figs. 1-33) wherein the antenna is a resonant element extending vertically from a ground surface, and the scatterer is arranged parallel to the antenna with a length of 0.1 to 1 times a wavelength A of an operation frequency of the antenna ([0064],[0069]). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Yokota et al. (U.S. Patent Application No. 20230335890) teaches an antenna. Mizuno et al. (U.S. Patent Application No. 20200067180) teaches an antenna. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANIEL MUNOZ whose telephone number is (571)270-1957. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9 a.m. - 5 p.m. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jessica Han can be reached at 571-272-2078. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANIEL MUNOZ/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2896
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 27, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Apr 06, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12592477
ANTENNA, ANTENNA ARRAY AND MOBILE COMMUNICATION BASE STATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592493
METASURFACE UNIT AND ANTENNA
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586890
ANTENNA DEVICE AND VEHICLE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12586918
COMMUNICATIONS ASSEMBLY AND ASSOCIATED METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12586900
FEED NETWORK AND ANTENNA
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+22.9%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 542 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month