Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/852,750

REPEATED INTERMITTENT ECG EVENT DETECTION

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 30, 2024
Priority
Mar 30, 2022 — provisional 63/325,198 +1 more
Examiner
DIETRICH, JOSEPH M
Art Unit
3792
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
753 granted / 930 resolved
+11.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
974
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
76.8%
+36.8% vs TC avg
§102
8.8%
-31.2% vs TC avg
§112
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 930 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 – 17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Xia et al. (US PGPUB 2021/0338135 – in IDS). Regarding claims 1, 7, 12, and 17, Xia discloses a controller, a method, a tangible non-transitory computer readable storage medium, and a system, comprising: an electrocardiography apparatus (e.g. ¶ 46) including a memory that stores instructions and a processor that executes the instructions (e.g. ¶ 42); and a display (e.g. ¶ 28), wherein, when executed by the processor, the instructions cause the electrocardiography apparatus to: obtain an electrocardiography signal (e.g. ¶ 48); identify a plurality of instances of intermittent events from the electrocardiography signal based on waveforms in the electrocardiography signal (e.g. ¶ 48, 59); locate a source of the plurality of instances of the intermittent events (e.g. Fig. 3, ¶ 74-75); and initiate generation of a visualization of the source of the plurality of instances of the intermittent events on the display (e.g. ¶ 117-118). Regarding claims 2, 10, and 15, Xia discloses identifying noise in the electrocardiography signal, and eliminate a period where the noise occurs (e.g. ¶ 55). Regarding claims 3, 11, and 16, Xia discloses quantifying differences between the electrocardiography signal and a baseline; determining when the differences exceed a predetermined threshold, and identifying the plurality of instances of the intermittent events based on determining that the differences exceed the predetermined threshold (e.g. ¶ 65). Regarding claim 4, Xia discloses the differences comprise differences between characteristics of the electrocardiography signal and characteristics of the baseline (e.g. ¶ 65). Regarding claim 5, Xia discloses quantifying differences between a characteristic derived from the electrocardiography signal and a baseline; determining when the differences exceed a predetermined threshold, and identifying the plurality of instances of the intermittent events based on determining that the differences exceed the predetermined threshold (e.g. ¶ 65). Regarding claims 6, 8, and 13, Xia discloses wherein the source of the plurality of instances of the intermittent events is located while the electrocardiography signal is obtained in real-time (e.g. ¶ 49). Regarding claims 9 and 14, Xia discloses applying a real-time electrocardiography algorithm to the electrocardiography signal to identify the plurality of instances of the intermittent events (e.g. ¶ 59). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSEPH M DIETRICH whose telephone number is (571)270-1895. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 8:00-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer McDonald can be reached at 571-270-3061. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOSEPH M DIETRICH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3796
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 30, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12661497
INTRA-CARDIAC LEFT ATRIAL AND DUAL SUPPORT SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12642968
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR INCORPORATION OF OPTICAL SENSING INTO NEUROSTIMULATION SYSTEMS
4y 6m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12642967
MODULATION OF BRAIN-DERIVED NEUROTROPHIC FACTOR (BDNF)
3y 9m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12642557
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR INSTALLING A SENSOR IN A BODY
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12642981
WCD PACING PULSE GENERATION
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+8.3%)
3y 0m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 930 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month