Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/852,791

METHOD FOR RECLAIMING FIBERS FROM TEXTILES WASTE

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Sep 30, 2024
Priority
Apr 04, 2022 — provisional 63/326,923 +1 more
Examiner
ELHILO, EISA B
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Bromine Compounds Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
1206 granted / 1450 resolved
+23.2% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 9m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
1469
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.7%
-37.3% vs TC avg
§103
39.8%
-0.2% vs TC avg
§102
18.7%
-21.3% vs TC avg
§112
24.1%
-15.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1450 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Claims 1-36 are pending in this application. DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1 The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 2 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-36 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 1, 3-7, 18, 21 and 23-27 recite the limitations “molten salt hydrate (MSH)”. It is not clear what is the meaning of molten salt hydrate (MSH)?. Is it a salt material? A concentrated liquid material ? Or a mild sold material?. The claimed specification does not provide any guidance. Clarification is required. Claim 15 recites the term “substantially”. The term “substantially” is a relative term which renders the claims indefinite. The term “substantially” is not defined by the claim and the specification does not provide any guidance. Claims 17 and 34 recite the phrase “preferably” or “more preferably”. The phrase “preferably” renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitations following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP 2173.05(d). Claims 2, 8-14, 16, 19-20, 22, 28-33 and 35-36 are dependent upon rejected base claims. Therefore, 2, 8-14, 16, 19-20, 22, 28-33 and 35-36 are rejected as well. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 3 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. 4 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 21- 22, 28-34 and 36 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)1 as being anticipated by Huang et al. (CN 102093484 A). English translation of the Patent No. CN 102093484 A is used in this Office action. Huang et al. (CN’ 484 A) teaches a method for preparing nanocrystal cellulose by dissociating ZnCl2, wherein the method comprises adding cellulose material into ZnCl2 solution to obtain transparent cellulose/ZnCl2 solution and adding diluted acid into the cellulose/ZnCl2 solution to precipitate the nanocrystal cellulose and wherein the acid is hydrochloric acid as claimed in claims 21 and 22 (see English translation of the Patent No. CN 102093484 A, claims 1, 6 and 10), wherein the heating condition is heating to 80-100 degrees centigrade as claimed in claim 28 (see English translation of the Patent No. CN 102093484 A, claim 4) and wherein the pH value of the solution is adjusted as claimed in claim 29 (see English translation of the Patent No. CN 102093484 A, claim 1), wherein the cellulose is eluting after diluting with water as claimed in claim 30 (see English translation of the Patent No. CN 102093484 A, claim 10) and wherein the cellulose material is a cotton as claimed in claims 31-32 (see English translation of the Patent No. CN 102093484 A, claim 2) and wherein the cellulose material is recovered in the form of nanocrystal cellulose as claimed in claim 33 (see English translation of the Patent No. CN 102093484 A, claim 1) and wherein the acid is diluted to 0.1 to 10% which covered the claimed range as claimed in claim 36 (see English translation of the Patent No. CN 102093484 A, claim 6). Huang et al. (CN’ 484 A) teaches method for preparing nanocrystal cellulose which is same to the claimed method, which inherently should obtained same micro crystalline cellulose having same degree of polymerization as those claimed in claim 34. Huang et al. (CN’ 484 A) teaches all the limitations of the instant claims. Hence, Huang et al. (CN’ 484 A) anticipates the claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EISA B ELHILO whose telephone number is (571)272-1315. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 7:00 AM to 3:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Angela Brown-Pettigrew can be reached at (571)272-2817. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /EISA B ELHILO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1761
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 30, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12698456
N-SUBSTITUTED 2-(6-HYDROXY-3-OXO-3H-XANTHENE-9-YL)BENZAMIDES AS PHOTOACTIVATORS IN DETERGENTS
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12692461
Composite Form of Tetraacetylenediamine
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12692463
BLENDS OF ALCOHOL ETHOXYLATE AND METHYL ESTER SULFONATE IN UNIT DOSE PRODUCTS FOR IMPROVED MILDNESS
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12692457
SOLAR PANEL CLEANING FORMULATION
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12685704
MULTIPHASE CLEANSING COMPOSITION
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+15.9%)
1y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1450 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month