Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 14, 2026
Application No. 18/853,211

FASTENER

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Oct 01, 2024
Priority
Apr 12, 2022 — DE 10 2022 108 903.7 +2 more
Examiner
SHANSKE, JASON D
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Fischerwerke GmbH & Co. Kg
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
383 granted / 500 resolved
+16.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
507
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.6%
-36.4% vs TC avg
§103
39.1%
-0.9% vs TC avg
§102
20.4%
-19.6% vs TC avg
§112
34.3%
-5.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 500 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 1 introduces “a bell-shaped claw” at line 2, and all furthers references in claim 1 are to “the claw”. However, claims 3 and 12 which depend from claim 1 both refer to “the bell-shaped claw”, and claims 2 – 6 and 8 – 13 which depend from claim 1 refer to “the claw”. For consistency purposes, all references throughout the claims after the term “a bell-shaped claw” was introduced in claim 1 should be to only one of “the bell-shaped claw” or “the claw”, and should not switch between the two options. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: “the claw can be acted upon by the tensioner” at line 7 should be replaced with “the claw is configured to be acted upon by the tensioner”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: “thereby pivots about a pivot axis/es” at line 11 should be replaced with “thereby pivots about a pivot axis”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 6 is objected to because of the following informalities: “its outer edge” at line 3 should be replaced with “the outer edge of the claw”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 12 is objected to because of the following informalities: “a component having a recess” at lines 2 – 3 should be replaced with “the component having the recess”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 3, 4 and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 3 recites in part “wherein the bell-shaped claw projects axially no more than 3mm, and in particular no more than 2mm beyond the counter bearing”. The use of “in particular” renders the scope of the claim indefinite as it is unclear if what follows the “in particular” is, or is not, required. For examination purposes, this limitation will be interpreted as “wherein the bell-shaped claw projects axially no more than 3mm beyond the counter bearing”. Claim 4 recites in part “an inner side of the claw” at lines 3 – 4. It is unclear if the inner side referenced in claim 4 is the same as the inner side introduced in claim 1 at line 5. For examination purposes, the inner side of claim 4 will be interpreted as the same inner side introduced in claim 1. Claim 13 recites the limitation "the counter bearing plate" at line 4. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 2, 5 – 12, 14 and 15 are allowed. Claims 3, 4 and 13 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Allowable Subject Matter The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: None of the cited references, either alone or in combination, disclose the claimed limitations. The closest piece of prior art is Gunther et al. (German Patent Application Publication No. DE 1961489), which discloses a fastener for fastening in a recess (2) of a component (1), comprising a bell-shaped claw (3) and comprising a tensioning axis (23) that passes through the claw (3) (Fig. 6). Gunther fails to disclose a tensioner on an outer side of the claw and a counter bearing on an inner side of the claw at a radial distance from the tensioning axis between an outer edge of the claw and the tensioning axis, and in that, starting from an untensioned state, the claw can be acted upon by the tensioner in a tensioning direction at a smaller radial distance from the tensioning axis than the radial distance of the counter bearing from the tensioning axis along the tensioning axis in such a way that the claw is pressed against the counter bearing and thereby pivots about a pivot axis/es surrounding the tensioning axis or about one or more pivot axis/es tangential to the tensioning axis on the counter bearing, as a result of which the outer edge of the claw moves radially away from the tensioning axis as claimed in independent claim 1. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JASON D SHANSKE whose telephone number is (571)270-5985. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 9:30 - 5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JASON D SHANSKE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3614
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 01, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679468
OFF-ROAD VEHICLE
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12669142
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR LEVELING A FASTENING ELEMENT TO BE ANCHORED IN A SUBSTRATE
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12654553
DUAL AXIS ROTATIONAL MECHANISM
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12654525
MOLDED SURFACE FASTENER
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12629993
VEHICLE
2y 4m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+14.6%)
2y 6m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 500 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month