Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/853,520

COMBINATION THERAPY FOR TREATING CANCER

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 02, 2024
Priority
Apr 07, 2022 — provisional 63/362,614 +1 more
Examiner
SCHMITT, MICHAEL J
Art Unit
1629
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Astrazeneca AB
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
57%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
77%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 57% of resolved cases
57%
Career Allowance Rate
375 granted / 658 resolved
-3.0% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
701
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.0%
-36.0% vs TC avg
§103
36.9%
-3.1% vs TC avg
§102
15.2%
-24.8% vs TC avg
§112
21.6%
-18.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 658 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-6, 8-10, and 41-42 are pending. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority The instant application filed 10/2/2024 is a National Stage entry of PCT/EP2023/059123, International Filing Date: 4/6/2023. 18853520 Claims Priority from Provisional Application 63362614, filed 4/7/2022. Information Disclosure Statement The Information Disclosure Statements (IDS) submitted on 1/9/2025 and 6/19/2026 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the Information Disclosure Statements are being considered by the Examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 1-6, 8-10, and 41-42 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Packer WO2021013735A1 published 1/28/2021; and Snyder US20180296574A1 published 10/18/2018. Instant claim 1 is directed to a method of treating metastatic prostate cancer, hormone sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC) or castrate resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) in a subject in need thereof, comprising administering to the subject a first amount of AZD5305 or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, and a second amount of abiraterone acetate, wherein the first amount and the second amount together comprise a therapeutically effective amount. Packer teaches the compounds of Formula (I), including Example 29: 6-{difluoromethyl)-5-[4-[{7-ethyl-6-oxo-5H-1,5-naDhthyridin-3-yl)methyl]DiDerazin-1-yl]-N- methyl-oyridine-2-carboxamide. This chemical name is also known as saruparib or AZD5305. Packer teaches the compounds for use in treatment or prophylaxis of diseases and conditions in which inhibition of PARP1 is beneficial. Packer states, “It is believed that PARP inhibitors having improved selectivity for PARP1 may possess improved efficacy and reduced toxicity compared to other clinical PARP1 /2 inhibitors… An unmet medical need therefore exists for effective and safe PARP inhibitors. Especially PARP inhibitors having selectivity for PARP1.” Packer teaches the PARP1 selective inhibitors can be used in prostate cancer. Packer teaches the treatment of cancer, comprising administering to a subject in need of treatment a therapeutically-effective amount of a compound of Formula I (including AZD5305) in combination, preferably in the form of a pharmaceutical composition, simultaneously or sequentially with ionizing radiation or chemotherapeutic agents. Parker doesn’t teach either of the 2 species of prostate cancer, hormone sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC) or castrate resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), and Parker doesn’t teach treating those cancers in combination with abiraterone acetate. Parker does suggest using these new compounds in place of non-selective PARP inhibitors (PARP1/2 inhibitors) as they “may possess improved efficacy and reduced toxicity” in comparison. The prior art, Snyder, teaches the combination of a non-selective PARP inhibitor (niraparib), abiraterone acetate, and prednisone to treat a prostate cancer (Claim 1). Snyder also teaches wherein the prostate cancer is hormone-sensitive or castration-resistant prostate cancer (Claim 2). A person of ordinary skill in the art would find it obvious to substitute AZD5305 in the method of treating prostate cancer taught by Snyder because Parker suggests that AZD5305 might “possess improved efficacy and reduced toxicity” when used in place of the non-selective PARP inhibitor (niraparib). Therefore, one would expect the substitution to yield improved efficacy with reduced side effects. Instant claim 2 requires “wherein prednisone or prednisolone are administered to the subject.” Snyder teaches this using prednisone. Instant claim 3 requires “metastatic prostate cancer is metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) or metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).” Snyder teaches the combination for metastatic cancer [0006]. Instant claims 4, are to daily administration of the PARP inhibitor, Snyder teaches this [0040]. Instant claims 5 and 6 require, “wherein AZD5305 is administered in a dose of up to about 60 mg per day.” Packer states, “Oral formulations are preferred, particularly tablets or capsules which may be formulated by methods known to those skilled in the art to provide doses of the active compound in the range of 0.1 mg to 1000 mg.” And Snyder states, “Niraparib is provided as 200 mg capsules or tablets for once daily oral administration to a patient, abiraterone acetate is provided as capsules or tablets (4×250 mg, total dose 1000 mg) for once daily oral administration, and prednisone is provided as tablets or capsules (2×5 mg) for twice daily oral administration (one 5 mg tablet each of two times daily). Dosing of niraparib is initiated at a starting dose of 200 mg once daily, 67% of the current clinical dose for niraparib monotherapy.” The art clearly teaches the broader range of dosing for AZD5305, and the art clearly notes that dose will vary based on the compound, as Snyder notes the reduced dose in combination, as such one would find the dose of 60 mg per day obvious unless Applicant can show some significance. Instant claim 8 is to abiraterone acetate is administered once daily, this is taught by Snyder. Instant claim 9 is to wherein abiraterone acetate is administered in a dose of 1000 mg once daily. This is taught by Snyder. Instant claim 10 is to wherein AZD5305 and abiraterone acetate, are taken together, on an empty stomach, with no food two hours before. Snyder states, “with or without food” an shows them being taken together. [0073]. Instant claims 41 and 42 are directed to a pharmaceutical product and kit comprising i) AZD5305 or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, and ii) abiraterone acetate. The kit is obvious for the same rationale, given Snyder teaches the combination and kit. See claims 31-36 and [0012]. Conclusion No claims allowed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL J SCHMITT whose telephone number is (571)270-7047. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-6 MidDay Flex. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jeffrey Lundgren can be reached at 571-272-5541. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL J SCHMITT/Examiner, Art Unit 1629
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 02, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12741956
PYRAZOLYL QUINOXALINE KINASE INHIBITORS
4y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12709606
NOVEL ACID SECRETION INHIBITOR AND USE THEREOF
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12702668
METHOD FOR TREATING GRAFT VERSUS HOST DISEASE CAUSED BY HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION
3y 6m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12697391
Bi-functional Molecules to Degrade Circulating Proteins
4y 4m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12697319
METHODS FOR INHIBITING THE PROGRESSION OF NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES
3y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
57%
Grant Probability
77%
With Interview (+20.4%)
2y 10m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 658 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month