Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/853,624

Positive Electrode Active Material, and Positive Electrode and Lithium Secondary Battery Including the Same

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Oct 02, 2024
Priority
Apr 07, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0043660 +1 more
Examiner
YOUNG, WILLIAM D
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
LG Energy Solution Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
54%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
70%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 54% of resolved cases
54%
Career Allowance Rate
380 granted / 699 resolved
-5.6% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
52 currently pending
Career history
741
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
45.9%
+5.9% vs TC avg
§102
22.4%
-17.6% vs TC avg
§112
26.8%
-13.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 699 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION The following Office action concerns Patent Application Number 18/853,624. Claims 1-15 are pending in the application. Claims 9-13 are withdrawn from consideration as being drawn to non-elected inventions or species. Election/Restrictions A restriction requirement was sent to the Applicant on May 15, 2026. The Applicant was required to elect among several groups of inventions. The Applicant responded to the restriction requirement on July 8, 2026 and elected Group I, claims 1-10, 14, 15. The applicant also elected a species of compound having nickel content of 85-95 mol %. Since the election was not made with traverse, it is treated as being made without traverse. Accordingly, claims 9-13 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to non-elected inventions or species. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. § 112 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: (b) CONCLUSION.-The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 1-8, 14, 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112(b) because the term “ppm” is indefinite. The conventional meaning of “ppm” is parts per million. However, parts per million does not make sense in the instant claims. As a result, the scope and meaning of the claims is indefinite. Claim Rejections - 35 USC §§ 102 and 103 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. § 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. § 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-8, 14, 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by, or, alternatively, under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being obvious over Chae et al (KR 2020-0090661, m.t., included in the IDS). Chae et al teaches a positive electrode active material for a lithium secondary battery, wherein the active material is a lithium composite metal oxide comprising nickel, cobalt, manganese and aluminum (p. 2). The atomic amount of nickel is 0.8 to 0.95, which equates to 80-95 mol % of the total metals other than lithium (p. 1). The atomic amount of cobalt is 0.01-0.2, which equates to 1-20 mol % of the total metals other than lithium (p. 1). The active material is used in a positive electrode of a secondary battery (p. 7). Chae et al is silent with respect to the ratio I550/I700. However, the teaching of Chae et al has anticipated or rendered obvious the instantly claimed lithium composite metal oxide. Therefore, it is reasonable that a person of ordinary skill in the art would expect the claimed value of I550/I700 to naturally arise. Chae et al is silent with respect to the 1D NMR center band spectrum. However, the teaching of Chae et al has anticipated or rendered obvious the instantly claimed lithium composite metal oxide. Therefore, it is reasonable that a person of ordinary skill in the art would expect the claimed physical property to naturally arise. Chae et al is silent with respect to the FWHM at 600-800 ppm and 450-650 ppm and -10 to 10 ppm. However, the teaching of Chae et al has anticipated or rendered obvious the instantly claimed lithium composite metal oxide. Therefore, it is reasonable that a person of ordinary skill in the art would expect the claimed physical property to naturally arise. In the event that the above disclosure is not sufficiently specific to anticipate the above listed claims, the examiner submits that the selection of the instantly metal components and resultant properties would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art since Chae et al teaches a positive electrode active material comprising each of the claimed components within the claimed ranges. Examiner’s Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to William Young whose telephone number is (571) 270-5078. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday, 8:30 AM to 5 PM. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Angela Brown-Pettigrew, can be reached at 571-272-2817. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000./WILLIAM D YOUNG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1761 July 22, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 02, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707615
COMPOSITE MATERIAL AND SHIELDING AGAINST ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION
3y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12706305
METHOD OF MAKING A CATHODE ACTIVE MATERIAL
3y 6m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12700550
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING ELECTRONIC COMPONENT
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12692361
GRAPHENE-MODIFIED POLYMERIC FOAM AND ARTICLES MADE THEREOF
3y 11m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12690385
INDOLO[3.2.1-JK]CARBAZOLE-6-CARBONITRILE DERIVATIVES AS BLUE FLUORESCENT EMITTERS FOR USE IN OLEDS
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
54%
Grant Probability
70%
With Interview (+15.4%)
2y 11m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 699 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month