Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 23, 2026
Application No. 18/854,959

ROBOT

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Oct 07, 2024
Priority
Jun 23, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2022025161
Examiner
JOYCE, WILLIAM C
Art Unit
3618
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
FANUC Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
860 granted / 1235 resolved
+17.6% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
1270
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
45.1%
+5.1% vs TC avg
§102
27.2%
-12.8% vs TC avg
§112
25.5%
-14.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1235 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION This Office Action is in response to the amendment filed September 3, 2026 for the above identified patent application. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kume (USPub 2019/0315001). Kume teaches a robot comprising: a first wrist element (2) supported at a distal end of an arm (140) so as to be rotatable about a first axis (A); a second wrist element (3) supported so as to be rotatable with respect to the first wrist element about a second axis (B) orthogonal to the first axis; and a third wrist element (4) supported so as to be rotatable with respect to the second wrist element about a third axis (C) orthogonal to the second axis, wherein the first wrist element is provided with a first space (shown with the dash line in the annotated Fig. below) accommodating a first motor (7) that drives the second wrist element and a second motor (6) that drives the third wrist element, and second spaces (located above and below the first space in the annotated Fig. below) that communicate with the first space and that are respectively disposed on both sides thereof with the first space interposed therebetween in the second axis direction, and a wire body (the upper wire body 8 that extends through wrist element 4, Fig. 10) guided through the arm is guided through at least one of the second spaces (upper second space in the annotated Fig. below) and then into the first space (within the box illustrated with the dash line) at a position located along the first axis, closer to the second wrist element than at least one of the first motor and the second motor. [AltContent: textbox (First Space)][AltContent: rect][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: rect][AltContent: rect] PNG media_image1.png 529 545 media_image1.png Greyscale Allowable Subject Matter Claim 2 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 3-4 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art does not teach the claimed robot wrist structure of claim 1, including: the second spaces respectively accommodate a first power transmission mechanism that transmits power of the first motor to the second wrist element and a second power transmission mechanism that transmits power of the second motor to the third wrist element (claim 2), or a flat plate-shaped partition wall that partially partitions the first space and each of the second spaces, and to which the first motor or the second motor is fixed, wherein a wire body guided through the arm is guided through at least one of the second spaces, and wherein the wire body passing through the second space is held on the partition wall by means of a holding member (claims 3-4). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Note the cited references showing a wire body extending through a robot arm. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WILLIAM C JOYCE whose telephone number is (571)272-7107. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Minnah Seoh can be reached at 571-270-7778. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /WILLIAM C JOYCE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3618
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 07, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Sep 03, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 09, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12768431
THREE SPEED ELECTRIC VEHICLE TRANSMISSION
1y 11m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12759137
DUAL ROBOT INCLUDING SPLAYED END EFFECTORS AND SYSTEMS AND METHODS INCLUDING SAME
2y 12m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12747785
TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12736109
THREE SPEED ELECTRIC VEHICLE TRANSMISSION
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12736110
REVERSE DRIVE ASSEMBLY FOR MOTORIZED VEHICLE
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+16.0%)
3y 3m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1235 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month