Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/855,078

TERMINAL APPARATUS, BASE STATION APPARATUS, AND COMMUNICATION METHOD

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 08, 2024
Priority
Apr 13, 2022 — JP 2022-066026 +1 more
Examiner
LYTLE JR., BRADLEY D
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Sharp Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
43 granted / 54 resolved
+19.6% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
89
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
71.8%
+31.8% vs TC avg
§102
22.8%
-17.2% vs TC avg
§112
3.6%
-36.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 54 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 12/24/2025 and 10/08/2024 were filed after the mailing date of the application on 10/08/2024. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Dinan (US 2013/0028239), hereinafter Dinan. Regarding Claim 1, Dinan teaches: A terminal apparatus comprising: radio resource control layer processing circuitry: “he wireless device 406 may include . . .at least one processor 408” (Dinan ¶ 0019) configured to configure a first time alignment timer and a second time alignment timer for a serving cell: “The number of time alignment timer to be maintained may be one per carrier group. Time alignment timers may be configured by the base station” (Dinan ¶ 0074) and “There may be one timing reference and one time alignment timer (time alignment timer) per carrier group. Time alignment timer for carrier groups may be configured with different values” (Dinan ¶ 0029); medium access control layer processing circuitry: “he wireless device 406 may include . . . at least one processor 408” (Dinan ¶ 0019); and reception circuitry: “he wireless device 406 may include at least one communication interface 407” (Dinan ¶ 0019) configured to receive a first TA command and a second TA command applied to the serving cell: “Carrier(s) may be grouped in carrier groups, and carrier groups may have their own downlink timing reference, time alignment timer, and/or time alignment commands. Group(s) may have their own random access process” (Dinan ¶ 0120), wherein the medium access control layer processing circuitry starts or restarts the first time alignment timer based at least on reception of the first TA command: “a wireless device may include a configurable timer (timeAlignmentTimer) that may be used to control how long the wireless device is considered uplink time aligned. When a timing alignment command MAC control element is received, the wireless device may apply the timing alignment command and start or restart timeAlignmentTimer” (Dinan ¶ 0120), the medium access control layer processing circuitry starts or restarts the second time alignment timer based at least on reception of the second TA command: “Base station 602 transmits time alignment commands to the wireless device. The time alignment commands are configured to cause adjustment of carrier(s) transmission time. The time alignment value for different carrier groups may be different. Upon reception of the commands by the wireless device 601, the wireless device 601 may adjust uplink carrier signal timings of the corresponding carrier group accordingly” (Dinan ¶ 0063), and in a case that the first time alignment timer or the second time alignment timer expires, the medium access control layer processing circuitry flushes all HARQ buffers for the serving cell: “When the time alignment timer associated with the first carrier group expires, all time alignment timers may be considered as expired and the wireless device may flush all HARQ buffers of all serving carriers . . . When the time alignment timer associated with second carrier group expires: . . . and/or d) MAC may flush the uplink HARQ buffers of the corresponding second carriers” (Dinan ¶ 0029). Regarding Claim 2, Dinan teaches: A base station apparatus comprising: radio resource control layer processing circuitry: “The base station 401 may include . . . at least one processor 403” (Dinan ¶ 0019) configured to configure a first time alignment timer and a second time alignment timer for a serving cell: “The number of time alignment timer to be maintained may be one per carrier group. Time alignment timers may be configured by the base station” (Dinan ¶ 0074) and “There may be one timing reference and one time alignment timer (time alignment timer) per carrier group. Time alignment timer for carrier groups may be configured with different values” (Dinan ¶ 0029); and medium access control layer processing circuitry: “The base station 401 may include . . . at least one processor 403” (Dinan ¶ 0019); and transmission circuitry: “The base station 401 may include at least one communication interface 402” (Dinan ¶ 0019) configured to transmit a first TA command and a second TA command applied to the serving cell: “Carrier(s) may be grouped in carrier groups, and carrier groups may have their own downlink timing reference, time alignment timer, and/or time alignment commands. Group(s) may have their own random access process” (Dinan ¶ 0120), wherein the first time alignment timer is started or restarted by a terminal apparatus based at least on reception of the first TA command: “a wireless device may include a configurable timer (timeAlignmentTimer) that may be used to control how long the wireless device is considered uplink time aligned. When a timing alignment command MAC control element is received, the wireless device may apply the timing alignment command and start or restart timeAlignmentTimer” (Dinan ¶ 0120), the second time alignment timer is started or restarted by a terminal apparatus based at least on reception of the second TA command: “Base station 602 transmits time alignment commands to the wireless device. The time alignment commands are configured to cause adjustment of carrier(s) transmission time. The time alignment value for different carrier groups may be different. Upon reception of the commands by the wireless device 601, the wireless device 601 may adjust uplink carrier signal timings of the corresponding carrier group accordingly” (Dinan ¶ 0063), and in a case that the first time alignment timer or the second time alignment timer expires, all HARQ buffers for the serving cell are flushed: “When the time alignment timer associated with the first carrier group expires, all time alignment timers may be considered as expired and the wireless device may flush all HARQ buffers of all serving carriers . . . When the time alignment timer associated with second carrier group expires: . . . and/or d) MAC may flush the uplink HARQ buffers of the corresponding second carriers” (Dinan ¶ 0029). Regarding Claim 3, Dinan teaches: A communication method used by a terminal apparatus, the method comprising: configuring a first time alignment timer and a second time alignment timer for a serving cell: “The number of time alignment timer to be maintained may be one per carrier group. Time alignment timers may be configured by the base station” (Dinan ¶ 0074) and “There may be one timing reference and one time alignment timer (time alignment timer) per carrier group. Time alignment timer for carrier groups may be configured with different values” (Dinan ¶ 0029); and receiving a first TA command and a second TA command applied to the serving cell: “Carrier(s) may be grouped in carrier groups, and carrier groups may have their own downlink timing reference, time alignment timer, and/or time alignment commands. Group(s) may have their own random access process” (Dinan ¶ 0120); starting or restarting the first time alignment timer based at least on reception of the first TA command: “a wireless device may include a configurable timer (timeAlignmentTimer) that may be used to control how long the wireless device is considered uplink time aligned. When a timing alignment command MAC control element is received, the wireless device may apply the timing alignment command and start or restart timeAlignmentTimer” (Dinan ¶ 0120); starting or restarting the second time alignment timer based at least on reception of the second TA command: “Base station 602 transmits time alignment commands to the wireless device. The time alignment commands are configured to cause adjustment of carrier(s) transmission time. The time alignment value for different carrier groups may be different. Upon reception of the commands by the wireless device 601, the wireless device 601 may adjust uplink carrier signal timings of the corresponding carrier group accordingly” (Dinan ¶ 0063); and in a case that the first time alignment timer or the second time alignment timer expires, flushing all HARQ buffers for the serving cell: “When the time alignment timer associated with the first carrier group expires, all time alignment timers may be considered as expired and the wireless device may flush all HARQ buffers of all serving carriers . . . When the time alignment timer associated with second carrier group expires: . . . and/or d) MAC may flush the uplink HARQ buffers of the corresponding second carriers” (Dinan ¶ 0029). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRADLEY DAVIS LYTLE whose telephone number is (703)756-4593. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00 AM - 4:00 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kwang bin Yao can be reached at 571-272-3182. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /B.D.L./Examiner, Art Unit 2473 /BRADLEY D LYTLE JR./Examiner, Art Unit 2473 /KWANG B YAO/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2473
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 08, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12745294
ONBOARDING VIRTUALIZED NETWORK DEVICES TO CLOUD-BASED NETWORK ASSURANCE SYSTEM
4y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12720382
Additional Reference Signals for UEs in Non-Connected States
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12707288
System And Method For Dynamically Varying Retry Rates In UAV Communications
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12672132
RESOURCE BLOCKS IN UPLINK BAND OF SUBBAND FULL DUPLEX SYMBOL
2y 12m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12666253
COMMUNICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR EXTERNAL DEVICES, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+21.1%)
3y 0m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 54 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month