Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/855,094

METHOD FOR CONNECTING A DEVICE TO A WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORK

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 08, 2024
Examiner
BOUTAH, ALINA A
Art Unit
2458
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Electrolux Appliances Aktiebolag
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allow Rate
745 granted / 830 resolved
+31.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
850
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
14.9%
-25.1% vs TC avg
§103
35.8%
-4.2% vs TC avg
§102
19.4%
-20.6% vs TC avg
§112
16.4%
-23.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 830 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This office action is in response to Applicant’s preliminary amendment filed October 8, 2024. Claims 1-23 have been amended and are pending. Information Disclosure Statement The IDS filed October 8, 2024 has been considered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2, 6, 7, 11, 14-23 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Drake (US 20190363904, NOTE: this reference is cited in the IDS filed October 8, 2024). Regarding claim 1, Drake teaches a method for connecting a household device to a wireless communication network, the method comprising: at the household device, broadcasting, using wireless communication technology, identification information of the household device (abstract - discovering the appliance by receiving a short-range broadcast from the appliance. The short-range broadcast includes a unique identifier and a model number.); at a user device associated with a user of the household device (abstract - The method also includes establishing an encrypted short-range radio connection between the appliance and the remote user interface device. The method further includes receiving a network credential for the secure network and transmitting the network credential to the appliance via the encrypted short-range radio connection. The method then includes connecting the appliance to the secure network using the received network credential.); receiving the identification information of the household device using the wireless communication technology (abstract - The method further includes receiving a network credential for the secure network and transmitting the network credential to the appliance via the encrypted short-range radio connection. The method then includes connecting the appliance to the secure network using the received network credential.); identifying the household device based on the received identification information, and prompting the user to perform a confirmation action, associated with the identified household device, to confirm an attendance of the user in proximity of the household device ([0046] In some embodiments, the remote user interface device 1000 may also be configured to display a picture of the appliance 10 on the user interface 1002 of the remote user interface device 1000 based on the received model number. The remote user interface device 1000 may then prompt a user to indicate whether the user wishes to connect the indicated appliance 10, e.g., as shown in the picture, to a WI-FI network.); at the household device, detecting the confirmation action and notifying it to the user device using the wireless communication technology ([0047] Once the appliance 10 has been discovered, the appliance 10 may be authenticated and connected to a secure wireless, e.g., WI-FI, network 2000. In order to authenticate the appliance 10 and connect it to the secure WI-FI network 2000, the appliance 10 and the remote user interface device 1000 may establish an encrypted short-range radio connection 1022 therebetween, such as a BLE connection on an encrypted channel.); at the user device, in response to being notified of the detected confirmation action, transmitting to the household device, using the wireless communication technology, network configuration data for connection to the wireless communication network ([0046] The remote user interface device 1000 may then prompt a user to indicate whether the user wishes to connect the indicated appliance 10, e.g., as shown in the picture, to a WI-FI network. [0047] Once the appliance 10 has been discovered, the appliance 10 may be authenticated and connected to a secure wireless, e.g., WI-FI, network 2000. In order to authenticate the appliance 10 and connect it to the secure WI-FI network 2000, the appliance 10 and the remote user interface device 1000 may establish an encrypted short-range radio connection 1022 therebetween, such as a BLE connection on an encrypted channel. [0049] Once this encrypted connection has been established, the appliance 10 can be authenticated and then receive a network credential 1024 for the secure network 2000, e.g., the secured WI-FI network, from the remote user interface device 1000 over the encrypted channel 1022.); at the household device, configuring a connection of the household device to the wireless communication network according to the network configuration data ([0049] Once this encrypted connection has been established, the appliance 10 can be authenticated and then receive a network credential 1024 for the secure network 2000, e.g., the secured WI-FI network, from the remote user interface device 1000 over the encrypted channel 1022. For example, the remote user interface device 1000 may receive the network credential 1024 for the secure network 2000 from a user and then transmit the network credential 1024 to the appliance 10 via the encrypted short-range radio connection 1022. The appliance 10 may then use the received network credential 1024 to establish a connection 1026 to the secure network 2000.). Regarding claim 2, Drake teaches the method according to claim 1, wherein the confirmation action, associated with the household device, comprises a direct interaction between the user and the household device ([0025] A user interface panel 100 and a user input device 102 may be positioned on an exterior of the cabinet 12. The user input device 102 is generally positioned proximate to the user interface panel 100, and in some embodiments, the user input device 102 may be positioned on the user interface panel 100. The appliance 10 may also include features for detecting the presence of a user, as will be described in more detail below.). Regarding claim 6, Drake teaches the method according to claim 1, wherein the confirmation action, associated with the household device, is based on the identification information ([0045] The broadcast 1020 may include a universally unique identifier (UUID), an appliance type, and a model number. The remote user interface device 1000 may be configured to filter out any signals, e.g., BLUETOOTH® signals, which do not include the UUID when scanning for broadcasts. The UUID may be specific to the network or service to which the appliance 10 will ultimately connect, e.g., the UUID may be specific to the manufacturer of the appliance 10.). Regarding claim 7, Drake teaches the method according to claim 1, wherein the identification information comprises at least one between a type of household device and a model of the household device ([0045] The broadcast 1020 may include a universally unique identifier (UUID), an appliance type, and a model number.). Regarding claim 11, Drake teaches the method according to claim 1, further comprising, following reception at the user device of the identification information, transmitting, at the user device, a response to the household device to allow pairing of the household device and the user device to each other, wherein the prompting of the user to perform the confirmation action is performed following pairing of the household device and the user device ([0046] In some embodiments, the remote user interface device 1000 may also be configured to display a picture of the appliance 10 on the user interface 1002 of the remote user interface device 1000 based on the received model number. The remote user interface device 1000 may then prompt a user to indicate whether the user wishes to connect the indicated appliance 10, e.g., as shown in the picture, to a WI-FI network.). Regarding claim 14, Drake teaches the method according to claim 1, further comprising, at the household device, performing wireless communication activation at a power on of the household device ([0043] An initial phase or process may include discovering the appliance 10. In various embodiments, the controller 210 may be configured to advertise or broadcast a signal 1020, such as a BLUETOOTH® Low Energy (“BLE”) signal.). Regarding claim 15, Drake teaches the method according to claim 1, further comprising, at the household device, performing wireless communication deactivation after a predefined time ([0043] An initial phase or process may include discovering the appliance 10. In various embodiments, the controller 210 may be configured to advertise or broadcast a signal 1020, such as a BLUETOOTH® Low Energy (“BLE”) signal. The remote user interface device 1000 may scan for BLE advertisements, e.g., automatically, including when an appliance app on the remote user interface device 1000 is active or simply running in the background. For example, the remote user interface device 1000 may provide a notification when an appliance 10 is discovered.). Regarding claim 16, Drake teaches the method according to claim 1, wherein the wireless communication technology is based on at least one among selected from the group consisting of: Bluetooth, NFC, RFID, ZigBee, and UWB technologies ([0041] BLUETOOTH). Regarding claim 17, Drake teaches the method according to claim 1, wherein the user device is at least one selected from the group consisting of a smartphone, a tablet, and a wearable device ([0039] The remote user interface device 1000 may be a laptop computer, smartphone, tablet, personal computer, wearable device, smart home system, and/or various other suitable devices). Claim 18 is similar to claim 1, but from a perspective of a household device. Nevertheless, the claim is similarly rejected under the same rationale as claim 1 as the inventive concept is the same. Claim 19 is similar to claim 1, but from a perspective of a user device. Nevertheless, the claim is similarly rejected under the same rationale as claim 1 as the inventive concept is the same. Regarding claim 20, Drake teaches a computer program product directly loadable into an internal memory storage of a processing unit within a household device, the computer program product comprising software for causing the household device to perform the steps of the method according to claim 1 when the computer program product is run on the household device ([0028] The controller 210 may be programmed to operate the appliance 10 by executing instructions stored in memory. For example, the instructions may be software or any set of instructions that when executed by the processing device, cause the processing device to perform operations. Controller 210 can include one or more processor(s) and associated memory device(s) configured to perform a variety of computer-implemented functions and/or instructions (e.g. performing the methods, steps, calculations and the like and storing relevant data as disclosed herein).). Regarding claim 21, Drake teaches a computer program product directly loadable into an internal memory storage of a processing unit within a user device, the computer program product comprising software for causing the user device to perform the steps of the method according to claim 19 when the computer program product is run on the user device ([0050] the remote user interface device 1000 may be configured to run software programs or applications.). Claim 22 is similar to claim 1, but from a perspective of a household device. Nevertheless, the claim is similarly rejected under the same rationale as claim 1 as the inventive concept is the same. Claim 22 differs in that it further recites a household device comprising: a control unit for controlling an operation of the household device; at least one wireless communication apparatus for allowing the household device to connect to a wireless communication network and for allowing the household device to communicate with a user device, associated with a user of the household device, using a communication link separate to the wireless communication network. Drake teaches a household device comprising: a control unit for controlling an operation of the household device ([0028] The controller 210 may be programmed to operate the appliance 10 by executing instructions stored in memory.); at least one wireless communication apparatus for allowing the household device to connect to a wireless communication network and for allowing the household device to communicate with a user device, associated with a user of the household device, using a communication link separate to the wireless communication network ([0041] The appliance 10 may communicate with the remote user interface device 1000 via short-range radio such as BLUETOOTH® or any other suitable wireless network having a layer protocol architecture.). Claim 23 is similar to claim 1, but broader because it only recites first and second devices. The claim is rejected under the same rationale as claim 1 as the inventive concept is the same. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 3, 5, 8-10, 12, and 13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Drake in view of Francescangeli (US 20160315810, hereinafter referred to as “Frances” NOTE: this reference is also cited in the IDS filed October 8, 2024). Regarding claim 3, Drake does not teach the method according to claim 1, wherein the confirmation action comprises an action to be performed on an actuatable mechanical part of the household device. In an analogous art, Frances teaches wherein the confirmation action comprises an action to be performed on an actuatable mechanical part of the household device ([0047] the user may be directed actuate an appropriate control (e.g., physical button or graphical control element) on the appliance, and this actuation may cause the appliance for a short period of time to broadcast a SSID of its own (e.g., “Appliance_Network”)). Before the effective filing date of the invention, one of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to enable an action to be performed on an actuatable mechanical part of a household device as a way to enable user to manually connect the appliance to the network, thus making the connection convenient. Regarding claim 5, Drake does not teach the method according to claim 1, wherein the confirmation action, associated with the household device, comprises pressing and/or releasing a button on the household device. Frances teaches wherein the confirmation action, associated with the household device, comprises pressing and/or releasing a button on the household device ([0047] the user may be directed actuate an appropriate control (e.g., physical button or graphical control element) on the appliance, and this actuation may cause the appliance for a short period of time to broadcast a SSID of its own (e.g., “Appliance_Network”). As shown in FIG. 2B, the user device may discover the broadcast SSID and thereby the appliance, and connect to the appliance as a WLAN station using the SSID). Before the effective filing date of the invention, one of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to enable the pressing and/or releasing a button on the household device as a way to enable to manually connect the appliance to the network, thus making the connection convenient. Regarding claim 8, Drake does not teach the method according to claim 1, wherein said detecting the confirmation action further comprises, at the household device, detecting that the confirmation action is performed within a prescribed time limit. Frances teaches wherein said detecting the confirmation action further comprises, at the household device, detecting that the confirmation action is performed within a prescribed time limit ([0047] the user may be directed actuate an appropriate control (e.g., physical button or graphical control element) on the appliance, and this actuation may cause the appliance for a short period of time to broadcast a SSID of its own (e.g., “Appliance_Network”). As shown in FIG. 2B, the user device may discover the broadcast SSID and thereby the appliance, and connect to the appliance as a WLAN station using the SSID. Direction for this may be as shown in FIG. 3D. In some examples, this discovery of and connection to the appliance by the user device occurs without authentication of the user device or appliance to the other and without user authentication to either the user device or appliance.). Before the effective filing date of the invention, one of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to enable the confirmation action to be performed within a prescribed time limit so that the confirmation does not run indefinitely, thus ensuring that the appliance is allowed to reconnect or terminate the connection. Regarding claim 9, Drake does not teach the method according to claim 1, further comprising, if no confirmation action is detected to be performed within a prescribed time limit, repeating said prompting the user to perform the confirmation action. Frances teaches if no confirmation action is detected to be performed within a prescribed time limit, repeating said prompting the user to perform the confirmation action ([0047] the user may be directed actuate an appropriate control (e.g., physical button or graphical control element) on the appliance, and this actuation may cause the appliance for a short period of time to broadcast a SSID of its own (e.g., “Appliance_Network”). As shown in FIG. 2B, the user device may discover the broadcast SSID and thereby the appliance, and connect to the appliance as a WLAN station using the SSID. Direction for this may be as shown in FIG. 3D. In some examples, this discovery of and connection to the appliance by the user device occurs without authentication of the user device or appliance to the other and without user authentication to either the user device or appliance.). Before the effective filing date of the invention, one of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to repeat if no confirmation is detected to ensure that user is allowed to reconnect, thus improving chances of connections. Regarding claim 10, Drake does not teach the method according to claim 8, wherein said prompting the user to perform the confirmation action further comprises, at the user device, transmitting a corresponding notification to the household device, the prescribed time limit being counted by the household device starting from reception of the notification at the household device. Frances teaches wherein said prompting the user to perform the confirmation action further comprises, at the user device, transmitting a corresponding notification to the household device, the prescribed time limit being counted by the household device starting from reception of the notification at the household device ([0047] the user may be directed actuate an appropriate control (e.g., physical button or graphical control element) on the appliance, and this actuation may cause the appliance for a short period of time to broadcast a SSID of its own (e.g., “Appliance_Network”). As shown in FIG. 2B, the user device may discover the broadcast SSID and thereby the appliance, and connect to the appliance as a WLAN station using the SSID. Direction for this may be as shown in FIG. 3D. In some examples, this discovery of and connection to the appliance by the user device occurs without authentication of the user device or appliance to the other and without user authentication to either the user device or appliance.). Before the effective filing date of the invention, one of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to transmit a corresponding notification to the household device, the prescribed time limit being counted by the household device starting from reception of the notification at the household device in order to start the time so that the confirmation does not run indefinitely, thus ensuring that the appliance is allowed to reconnect or terminate the connection. Regarding claim 12, Drake does not teach the method according to claim 1, further comprising, at the household device, providing, to the user device a set of available wireless communication networks, and, at the user device, selecting a wireless communication network among the set of available communication networks, said prompting the user to perform the confirmation action being performed in response to said selecting a wireless communication network. Frances teaches at the household device, providing, to the user device a set of available wireless communication networks, and, at the user device, selecting a wireless communication network among the set of available communication networks, said prompting the user to perform the confirmation action being performed in response to said selecting a wireless communication network (figure 3E). Before the effective filing date of the invention, one of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to enable the selection of wireless communication networks in order to allow user to pick and choose the network of his or her preference, thus making the selection more catered towards the user’s needs. Regarding claim 13, Drake does not teach the method according to claim 12, wherein said selecting a wireless communication network comprises, if a known wireless communication network exists among the available wireless communication networks, automatically retrieving the network configuration data associated with the known wireless communication network, following user input indicating that the user wishes to connect the household device to the known wireless communication network. Frances teaches wherein said selecting a wireless communication network comprises, if a known wireless communication network exists among the available wireless communication networks, automatically retrieving the network configuration data associated with the known wireless communication network, following user input indicating that the user wishes to connect the household device to the known wireless communication network ([0042] In some examples, the network-connected appliance 102 may be additionally or alternatively provisioned with an identifier having a predefined association with the user account. This identifier may be known to the service platform 112, and when presented to the service platform by the network-connected appliance, the service platform may recognize that the network-connected appliance is associated with the user account with which the identifier is associated. The network-connected appliance of these examples may communicate with the service platform via the WLAN 104 and external network 110, and present the identifier to indicate the user account with which the network-connected appliance is associated.). Before the effective filing date of the invention, one of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to automatically retrieving the network configuration data associated with the known wireless communication network so that configurations can be deployed quickly, thus saving time. Claim(s) 4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Drake in view of Hasimoto (WO 2022153537). Regarding claim 4, Drake does not teach the method according to claim 1, wherein the confirmation action, associated with the household device, comprises moving a door of the household device. Hashimoto teaches wherein the confirmation action, associated with the household device, comprises moving a door of the household device (Embodiment 2: In the first embodiment, the normal mode and the connection mode are separated, and the network connection status is notified by using the lamps 11, 12 or the buzzer 13 during the connection mode. However, depending on the environment, that is, the cause of the failure, the network connection including the wireless connection with the router 40 or the connection with the server device 50 via the router 40 may be disconnected. For example, when a microwave oven is used, it interferes with the 2.4 GHz band, so that the wireless connection may be disconnected depending on the channel setting between the wireless communication modules 15B and 15C or the wireless communication adapter 30 and the router 40. In addition, the network connection is disconnected due to various factors such as wireless disconnection due to opening and closing of the door of the room where the home appliance 10 is provided, stoppage due to maintenance of the server device 50, disconnection of the WAN cable in the router 40 or the server device 50, and the like.). Before the effective filing date of the invention, one of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to confirm the action by moving a door of the household device because the motion serves as one of various ways to actuate the confirmation, thus the connection unique and efficient. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Guo, US 9730071 - connecting purpose-built appliances to secure wireless networks. Finch et al., US 20170048901 - associating a mobile device with an appliance Koningstein et al., US 9275005 - commissioning a device or appliance into a network. Ebrom, US 20140362991 - provisioning an appliance to connect to a Wi-Fi network includes a mobile device having an encryption key to enable secure communication in the network. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALINA N BOUTAH whose telephone number is (571)272-3908. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:00 AM - 3:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Umar Cheema can be reached at (571) 270-3037. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. ALINA BOUTAH Primary Examiner Art Unit 2458 /ALINA A BOUTAH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2458
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 08, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12568025
AUTOMATIC CONFIGURATION OF IOT DEVICES FOR ONLINE DATA BROKERAGE SERVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12568000
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PERFORMING FEDERATED LEARNING IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12563449
MECHANISM FOR OPERATION OF 3GPP TSN VIRTUAL BRIDGE IN A CENTRALIZED NETWORK/DISTRIBUTED USER MODEL IN A 5G SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12562934
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR BINDING PLURALITY OF ELECTRICAL DEVICES AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12556307
REDUCING TRANSMISSION OF DATA PACKETS IN DATA TRNASMISSION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+9.3%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 830 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month