Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/855,497

MILK MEASURING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Oct 09, 2024
Examiner
KO, TONY
Art Unit
2878
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Cowealthy Teknoloji Anonim Sirketi
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
773 granted / 879 resolved
+19.9% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+2.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
895
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
26.8%
-13.2% vs TC avg
§102
48.7%
+8.7% vs TC avg
§112
19.1%
-20.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 879 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 8 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 8 recites “the pressure of milk flowing”. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claims 8 and 11 recites the limitation "the milked animal information" in line 4. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2, 5-7 and 9-13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Dunn et al (US 20070289536). Regarding claim 1, Dunn et al teach (Figs. 1-4) a milk measuring device for determining at least one parameter of milk flowing through a flow line provided between an inlet opening and an outlet opening, wherein said flow line comprises: a firs circuit board (printed circuit board [0026] connecting to emitters) and a second circuit board (printed circuit board [0026] where detectors connected to) configured to remain there between; said first circuit board comprises a plurality of infrared transmitters (see figure 2, top/bottom emitters IR [0029]) directed towards said flow line (figure 2 – where milk flow) for emitting infrared ray; said second circuit board comprises a plurality of infrared receivers (Top/Bottom detector) directed toward first circuit board for detecting the infrared ray emitted by said infrared transmitters and generating a signal according to the detected infrared ray; the infrared ray emitted by each infrared transmitter is detected by at least two infrared receivers ([0037-0038] “if two light beams of different, selected wavelengths traverse the same optical path”) that comprise a processor unit (see figure 3, main microprocessor) for ensuring simultaneous operation of the infrared transmitter and the infrared receivers; and the processor unit is configured to determine at least one flow parameter (fat content see [0037-0038]) of the milk flowing through the flow line according to the signal generated by the infrared receivers. Regarding claim 2, Dunn et al teach (Fig. 2) the infrared transmitters provided on the first circuit board and the infrared receivers provided on the second circuit board are arranged in equal numbers and opposite each other. Regarding claim 5, Dunn et al teach a conductivity sensor (thermistor – see figure 2 where heat is CONDUCTED) for measuring the conductivity of milk, configured to be at least partially in contact with milk flowing through the flow line; wherein the processor unit is configured to determine at least one conductivity parameter of milk flowing through the flow line according to the signal it receives from said conductivity sensor. Regarding claim 6, Dunn et al teach a heat sensor (thermistor) for measuring the temperature of milk flowing through the flow line; wherein the processor unit is configured to determine at least one heat parameter of milk flowing through the flow line according to a signal it receives from said heat sensor. Regarding claim 7, Dunn et al teach the first circuit board comprises a light source (image illumination) directed towards the flow line for emitting visible light wavelength; the second circuit board comprises an optical sensor (camera) directed towards the first circuit board for detecting the light emitted by said light source and generating a signal according to the detected light; wherein the processor unit is configured to determine at least one color parameter of milk flowing through the flow line according to the signal it receives from the said optical sensor. Regarding claim 9, Dunn et al teach the flow line is made of infrared ray transmitting material. Regarding claim 10, Dunn et al teach ([0079]) at least part of said flow line is configured to transmit visible light wavelength. Regarding claim 11, Dunn et al teach ([0049]) the processor unit is configured to store the determined parameters in the said memory unit by associating it with the milked animal information. Regarding claim 12, Dunn et al teach a communication unit (video output section of microprocessor) for enabling external industrial device (User display see figure 3) to communicate with the milk measuring device. Regarding claim 13, Dunn et al teach a user interface (user control – see figure 3) for enabling the user to read out parameters determined by the processor unit. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 3 and 4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Dunn et al in view of Handique (US 20140329301). Regarding claims 3 and 4, Dunn et al teach the invention set forth above. Dunn et al do not the infrared transmitters provided on the first circuit board and the infrared receivers provided on the second circuit board are arranged in two rows of five. Handique teaches (Figs. 8) transmitter provided on a first circuit board and the receivers provided on the second circuit board arranged in two rows of five ([0104]-two by six which includes 2x5). It would have been obvious at the time of invention to use two by 5 detector array to expand the detection areas wherein the infrared receivers provided opposite thereto and at least five infrared receivers closest to the infrared receiver provided opposite thereto. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TONY KO whose telephone number is (571)272-1926. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Georgia Epps can be reached at 571-272-2328. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TONY KO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2878 TK
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 09, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596178
SENSOR ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591179
Metrology Apparatus
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12581199
DETECTION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12571919
OVERHEAD-STRUCTURE RECOGNITION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12569853
MOLECULAR DIAGNOSIS CARTRIDGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+2.3%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 879 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month