Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/855,769

OPTICAL CONNECTOR, OPTICAL CONNECTOR ASSEMBLY, AND OPTICAL CONNECTING STRUCTURE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 10, 2024
Priority
Jun 03, 2022 — JP 2022-090844 +1 more
Examiner
RAHLL, JERRY T
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Fujikura Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
1135 granted / 1264 resolved
+29.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
1277
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
46.6%
+6.6% vs TC avg
§102
40.7%
+0.7% vs TC avg
§112
10.7%
-29.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1264 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 10 October 2024 complies with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the examiner has considered the information disclosure statement; please see attached forms PTO-1449. Drawings The drawings submitted have been reviewed and determined to facilitate understanding of the invention. The drawings are accepted as submitted. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US Patent Application Publication US 2016/0238796 A1 to Nguyen et al. (“US1”), cited in Applicant’s IDS. US1 describes an optical connector (see Figs 6-12) comprising: a ferrule (210) including a connection end surface having a fiber hole through which an optical fiber is inserted; a holding (204) member that holds the ferrule; a spring push (100); and a biasing member (212) that biases the ferrule, one end of the biasing member contacting the holding member and the other end of the biasing member contacting the spring push (see Fig 8), wherein the holding member includes an engaging portion (202), and the spring push includes an engaged portion (118) that engages the engaging portion. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US1 as applied to Claim 1 above. US1 further describes the engaging portion and engaged portion engaged to prevent the holding member from falling off the spring push due to a biasing force of the biasing member, and allow the holding member to approach the spring push (see [0024]). US1 does not describe the engaged portion as a hole and at least part of the engaging portion is inserted into the hole. Instead, US1 describes the engaging portion of the holding member as a hole (202) and the engaged portion (118) of the spring push as inserted into the hole (see [0024] and Figs 8, 10). Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to alter the connector of US1 such that the hole of the holder member is replaced with the engaged portion structure of the spring push and vice versa, since it has been that reversal and/or rearrangement of parts are obvious modifications (see MPEP 2144.04.VI.C). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2 and 4-8 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 2 describes an extending portion extending toward the spring push and penetrating the biasing member, and the engaging portion is disposed on the extending portion. Claim 4 describes that when the release member is pulled in a rearward direction from the ferrule toward the spring push, the release member bends the engaging claw toward an inner side in the radial direction and releases an engagement between the engaging claw and the adapter. Claims 5-8 depend from Claim 4 and therefore contain at least the same allowable subject matter. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JERRY RAHLL whose telephone number is (571)272-2356. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00am-5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Uyen-Chau Le can be reached at 571-272-2397. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JERRY RAHLL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2874
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 10, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12742934
OPTICAL FIBER SHUFFLE CIRCUIT
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12736755
Ultra-small Form Factor Fiber Optic Connector and Adapter with Stubbing Prevention Features
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12736744
LIGHT-DRIVEN NANODRONES
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12724271
MICROLENS COLLIMATOR FOR SCANNING OPTICAL FIBER IN VIRTUAL/AUGMENTED REALITY SYSTEM
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12724215
OPTICAL FIBER TERMINATION, RELATED DEVICES, AND FABRICATION OF SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+8.3%)
2y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1264 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month