Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 05, 2026
Application No. 18/855,773

METAL POWDER AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Oct 10, 2024
Priority
Jun 13, 2022 — JP 2022-094863 +1 more
Examiner
KRUPICKA, ADAM C
Art Unit
1784
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
JFE Mineral & Alloy Company Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 6m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allowance Rate
477 granted / 770 resolved
-3.1% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+27.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
813
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
78.6%
+38.6% vs TC avg
§102
5.6%
-34.4% vs TC avg
§112
13.1%
-26.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 770 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Group I, claims 1-3 and 8, in the reply filed on March 4, 2026 is acknowledged. Applicants’ arguments filed March 4, 2026 have been considered and are found to be persuasive. The restriction requirement dated January 6, 2026 is withdrawn, claims 1-9 are pending and fully examined for patentability. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112(b) The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION —The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 4-7 and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 4 requires a cooling step where “in the cooling step, a gas for cooling in an amount…of a total amount of an inert gas and the reducing gas required for the reaction is used”. The amount of cooling gas is established against a total of an inert gas and reducing gas. Applicants’ specification at paragraph 0041 references a cooling unit that cools “using an inert gas as a medium for cooling”. Paragraph 0042 references raw material introduced by a non-reactive inert gas and states that “The nickel chloride vapor obtained in the vaporizing unit 1 passes through the introduction pipe 5 and is introduced into the reaction unit 2 together with the inert gas for transportation.”. Paragraph 0046 additionally discusses an inert gas used for transportation as well as stating “the powder is cooled by the inert gas”. While applicants’ claims are not limited by the detailed description, it is unclear if the inert gas as claimed is a portion of the total including the cooling gas and the inert gas used for transportation, or is only based on any inert gas present in the reaction step. Do applicants intend separate cooling gases from inert gases, or can the cooling and inert gases be the same gas. If they are the same it is unclear if they are considered as separate portions, such as the cooling portion and any inert carrier portion? For purposes of examination the amount of gas for cooling will be considered relative to the total amount of inert gas (regardless of step or source) together with the amount of reducing gas. Claims 5-7 and 9 are rejected as depending directly or indirectly form claim 4 as rejected above. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-3 and 8 are allowed. Ito et al. (JP 2000045001A, references herein made to the English language translation from espacenet dated January 2, 2026). Ito et al. disclose metal powders such as nickel metal powders but do not disclose the powder to conform to the claimed parameters. In view of applicants’ traversal to the restriction requirement filed March 4, 2026, there is insufficient evidence such that one of ordinary skill in the art would have concluded that the powder of Ito et al. inherently exhibits parameters within the claimed ranges. Further there is no motivation such that one of ordinary skill in the art would have found it obvious to modify the process of Ito et al. such as to obtain a nickel powder exhibiting the claimed characteristics. Claims 4-7 and 9 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Ito et al. disclose a gas phase reduction process where nickel chloride gas is mixed with a reducing gas (page 6 lines 15-18), the nickel powder then being cooled by blowing of an inert gas, where the purity of the powder is 99.5% or greater (page 7 lines 4-34). Ito et al. do not appear to explicitly disclose that a gas cooled in the cooling step is prevented from flowing back to the reaction step, or specify a gas for cooling in an amount of 0.5 to 5.0 times molar amount of a total of an inert gas and the reducing gas required for the reaction. Further there is no motivation such that one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of applicants’ claimed invention would have found it obvious to modify the process of Ito et al. to conform to the cooling process including flow back prevention together with a cooling gas amount within the claimed range. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ADAM C KRUPICKA whose telephone number is (571)270-7086. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8-5pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Humera Sheikh can be reached at (571)272-0604. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Adam Krupicka/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1784
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 10, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jun 05, 2026
Interview Requested
Jun 17, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jun 17, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12662726
ALUMINUM EXTRUSIONS INCLUDING CO-EXTRUDED INSULATED, COATED AND/OR NON-CIRCULAR SHAPED REINFORCING WIRES
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12660550
MULTI-ZONE SILICON NITRIDE WAFER HEATER ASSEMBLY HAVING CORROSION PROTECTIVE LAYER, AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USING THE SAME
5y 11m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12655496
ULTRA-THICK STEEL SHEET WITH EXCELLENT STRENGTH AND LOW-TEMPERATURE IMPACT TOUGHNESS AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 12m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12637741
MAGNESIUM ALLOY AND PRODUCTION METHOD THEREOF
3y 9m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12642091
BONDED BODY, CERAMIC-COPPER CIRCUIT BOARD, AND SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
3y 2m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+27.2%)
3y 3m (~1y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 770 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month